CFB Zeitgeist Score
40
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 51st percentile.
Marlin Klein
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
248 REC YDS · 24 REC · 1 REC TD
Where He Ended Up · NFL
Houston2026 NFL rookie season
TE · MICHIGAN · BIG TEN
CFB Zeitgeist Score
40
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 51st percentile.
Heisman Heat
#1231
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP TE AWARD
Mackey
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2023–2025Up 3000% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3-star | 0.8815 | No. 545 recruit | HighSchool |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★☆☆
to —
Composite
0.8815
#545 national
NFL Draft
2026 · Rd 2, Pick 27
#59 overall · Houston
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
50
Mixed Sentiment
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
10.3
yds
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#405 of 531 All FBS WRs at 10.3 yards per reception (24 catches).
Vs cohort
MODERATE · n=24 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 1 vs New Mexico — 93 ypr
Result W 34-17
The week the volume broke through — put up 93 yds vs New Mexico.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
To hit 700-yard receiver (currently 248): needs 226/game over remaining 2.
To hit 1,000-yard receiver (currently 248): needs 376/game over remaining 2.
To hit 60-catch season (currently 24): needs 18/game over remaining 2.
To hit 80-catch season (currently 24): needs 28/game over remaining 2.
To hit 8 receiving TDs (currently 1): needs 3.5/game over remaining 2.
To hit 10 receiving TDs (currently 1): needs 4.5/game over remaining 2.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Marlin Klein's story is about how role and output meet each other. For Michigan, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Receiving weapon against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 11 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 34-17vs New Mexico | 6 | 93 | 15.5 | 1 | 27 | Season-high 93 yds |
| Wk 3 | W 63-3vs Central Michigan | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 | |
| Wk 4 | W 30-27@ Nebraska | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 0 | 16 | |
| Wk 6 | W 24-10vs Wisconsin | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 10 | |
| Wk 7 | L 13-31@ USC | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 | |
| Wk 9 | W 31-20@ Michigan State | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 | |
| Wk 10 | W 21-16vs Purdue | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | 10 | |
| Wk 12 | W 24-22@ Northwestern | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 10 | |
| Wk 13 | W 45-20@ Maryland | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 0 | 21 | |
| Wk 14 | L 9-27vs Ohio State | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bowl | L 27-41@ Texas | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 0 | 20 | |
| Total | 24 | 248 | 8.2 | 1 | 27 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The tight end's share of the passing offense, which helps distinguish a featured receiving tight end from a secondary option.
A blended usage view that shows how often the offense flows through the tight end compared with other same-level peers.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 24 | #80/475 | 83rd pct | Volumevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 248 | #87/475 | 82nd pct | Volumevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 1 | #140/475 | 71st pct | Scoringvs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 10.3 | #210/475 | 56th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Pass share | 13.6% | #34/468 | 93rd pct | Air-game usagevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 27 | #162/475 | 66th pct | Metricvs FBS TE |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 7.9% | #56/468 | 88th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 7.3% | #62/468 | 87th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS TE |
| Usage | Role share | 5.9% | #53/468 | 89th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS TE |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 5.7% | #53/468 | 89th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 5.4% | #91/468 | 81st pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 5.3% | #55/468 | 88th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS TE |
| Usage | Rush share | 0.0% | #58/468 | 88th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS TE |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
The Mackey award tracker integrates per-week probability once a dedicated scraper for this award lands. Confirmed past winners and finalists for this player will surface here.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 11 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home5g | 2.4 | 26.4 | 7.8 | 0.2 |
| Road6g | 2.0 | 19.3 | 8.6 | 0.0 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins8g | 2.2 | 25.5 | 9.5 | 0.1 |
| Losses3g | 2.0 | 14.7 | 4.9 | 0.0 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-76g | 2.7 | 30.2 | 9.4 | 0.2 |
| Weeks 8+5g | 1.6 | 13.4 | 6.9 | 0.0 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the TE cohort
Concern: rec tds (21st).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · TE · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Dual-threat: blocks when needed, catches when needed. Coveted on both sides.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Chase Allen’s 2021 season.
Chase Allen
Austin Stogner
Austin Stogner
Grayson Gunter
George Takacs
Matches Chase on
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
As a junior, his production profile tracks closest to George Takacs's junior season at Boston College (2022).
George Takacs
Jack Coldiron
Gus McGee
Keleki Latu
Austin Stogner
Matches George on
Differs from George on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Sherrone Moore
Pass share
40.9%
340 pass / 492 run
Plays / game
64.0
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
7.4%
256 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-leaning.
Coaching Lineage · 2023–2025
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Jim Harbaugh → Sherrone Moore. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.