Defensive back for UCLA. 2016: 1 interception, 3 pass breakups, 29 tackles.
6′2″ · Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Recruiting
S recruit
No. 64 nationally · Signed with UCLA
No college snaps yet.
His career numbers, season by seasonThe story
2016 defensive back for UCLA. 2016: 1 interception, 3 pass breakups, 29 tackles.
Tahaan Goodman
This is his second year in the same secondary at UCLA. One game to point at: 8 tackles against Texas A&M — Week 1, 2016.
Low coverage — composed from the verified record.
How it ended
Two seasons at UCLA, 29 tackles — his college career is complete.
His career
Career arc
Season context · Team result + system
2 seasons under Jim Mora — 14-11 over that span.
Where this defender ranks vs the field
Box-score production percentiles vs the position cohort
Concern: tackles for loss (8th percentile).
Percentiles are versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score production. There are no play-by-play efficiency bars here: CFBD's play-value model credits offensive players only, so no defensive EPA exists to rank.
Splits · Per-game
2016 season · 9 games
Home vs Road
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home3g | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Road6g | 3.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
First half vs Second half
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-76g | 3.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Weeks 8+3g | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Supporting cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Bob Chesney
Scheme reads (pass share, tempo, sack rate) need at least 3 team games — 2 games in so far.
Player standing · 2016
Earning real snaps in the rotation without a starting job.
SIGNATURE GAME · Week 3 · 2016
W 17–14
at BYU
Game log · Week-by-week
2016 season · 9 games
| Wk | Opp | TKL | SOLO | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | L 24-31@ Texas A&M | 8 | 5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 1 | Season-high 8 tackles |
| Wk 2 | W 42-21vs UNLV | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 3 | W 17-14@ BYU | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 1 | |
| Wk 4 | L 13-22vs Stanford | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 1 | |
| Wk 6 | L 20-23@ Arizona State | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 7 | L 21-27@ Washington State | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 10 | L 10-20@ Colorado | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Wk 12 | L 14-36vs USC | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 13 | L 10-36@ California | 5 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Total | 29 | 20 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 3 |
Activity vs finishing · season enumeration
What the box score actually says
29 tackles. 3 passes defended. 1 interceptions. 0 TFL.
Counts only, never a rate — splash-event sample sizes this small (interceptions, pass breakups, TFL) are noise as a rate and signal only as a tally.
Player DNA