East Texas A&M

3-6

Player stats

Player stats · 2026 season

No player stats logged for this program yet — stats appear once the season is underway.

How scary each game got

East Texas A&M lost at Mercer after being 97% to win; the closest win was against SE Louisiana, down to 22%

50%L1L1W2L3L4W5L7L8W9

Tap a game for its score and win chances.

Each bar runs from the lowest to the highest chance our model gave East Texas A&M during that game; the thick mark is where it started. Numbers are the game week.

Home-field advantage · 2018–present · FBS opponents

East Texas A&M has been 1.6 points worse at home than on the road.

Worse at home, 0th percentile of 133 programs

0% at home, 0% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (0-1 home, 0-7 away).

model 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest
model 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest
The stadium and how the home edge is measured

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge. The books use about 3. Per-team versions were tested and did not hold up (why). Against the closing line, East Texas A&M has beaten the number by −0.5 more at home than away over 33 games. That is inside the ±10.2 that many games can resolve, so the results cannot tell this stadium from the flat number. That is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

Memorial Stadium (Commerce TX) seats 11,582 and has averaged 29% full (3,357, 15 games reported). Visitors cover a median 302 miles to get here (2018-present).

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across 29 of 32 home games since 2018. No national trip rank shown: the ranked field is FBS venues only and leaves out the service academies and venues with too few measured games.

Home0-1Away0-7Edge−1.6Visitor trip302 mi

More in this tab

Scheme claimsFive specific, testable claims about how this team plays.

How much of East Texas A&M’s number is the schedule?

Raw EPA/play through week 10 is −0.01; adjusted for opponent strength, it's −0.02. The widest gap came in week 4: −0.04 raw vs. −0.00 adjusted.

0.06-0.00-0.06Wk 2Wk 6Wk 10Raw EPA/playOpponent-adjusted
0.06-0.00-0.06Wk 2Wk 6Wk 10RawAdjusted
Source CFB Zeitgeist · season-to-date, opponent-adjusted model
Havoc & trenchesDefense havoc rate 0.175, 69th percentile

Disruption, run-blocking, and down-and-distance efficiency.

Havoc rate (D) 0.175
69th
Havoc allowed (O) 0.178
17th
Front-seven havoc (D) 0.119
79th
Secondary havoc (D) 0.056
39th
Stuff rate (D) 0.209
61st
Stuff rate allowed (O) 0.185
44th
Line yards (O) 2.979
49th
Line yards allowed (D) 2.671
72nd
Standard-downs success (O) 0.440
24th
Standard-downs success allowed (D) 0.439
63rd
Passing-downs success (O) 0.282
26th
Passing-downs success allowed (D) 0.283
66th
Screened 12 claims, 12 survived · 2026 season, FBS only, min. 3 games with data this season
CFB Zeitgeist “Go Lions.”
This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. Text written by our model says so in a line beneath it, and it can get facts wrong. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site