Stonehill

4-5

Key stats

Key stats · 2026 · FBS rank

Each bar is the team’s national rank as a percentile. A longer bar is better, for defense too.

Points/game127th of 138
18.9
Pts allowed/game53rd of 138
22.6
All 21 stats
Other
1st-half EPA/play allowed0.10.0/gm
Pass rate, 1st downs37.9%37.9%

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats

Player stats · 2026 season

No player stats logged for this program yet — stats appear once the season is underway.

How scary each game got

Stonehill lost to Duquesne after being 69% to win; the closest win was at Long Island University, down to 3%

50%L1W1L2L3L4W6L7W8W9

Tap a game for its score and win chances.

Each bar runs from the lowest to the highest chance our model gave Stonehill during that game; the thick mark is where it started. Numbers are the game week.

More in this tab

Scheme claimsFive specific, testable claims about how this team plays.

How much of Stonehill’s number is the schedule?

Raw EPA/play through week 10 is −0.01; adjusted for opponent strength, it's −0.02. The widest gap came in week 3: 0.14 raw vs. 0.04 adjusted.

0.170.06-0.06Wk 2Wk 6Wk 10Raw EPA/playOpponent-adjusted
0.170.06-0.06Wk 2Wk 6Wk 10RawAdjusted
Source CFB Zeitgeist · season-to-date, opponent-adjusted model
Havoc & trenchesDefense havoc rate 0.163, 53th percentile

Disruption, run-blocking, and down-and-distance efficiency.

Havoc rate (D) 0.163
53rd
Havoc allowed (O) 0.167
28th
Front-seven havoc (D) 0.094
44th
Secondary havoc (D) 0.069
72nd
Stuff rate (D) 0.189
42nd
Stuff rate allowed (O) 0.273
1st
Line yards (O) 2.420
3rd
Line yards allowed (D) 2.903
42nd
Standard-downs success (O) 0.404
5th
Standard-downs success allowed (D) 0.425
75th
Passing-downs success (O) 0.287
30th
Passing-downs success allowed (D) 0.311
37th
Screened 12 claims, 12 survived · 2026 season, FBS only, min. 3 games with data this season
CFB Zeitgeist “Go Skyhawks.”
This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. Text written by our model says so in a line beneath it, and it can get facts wrong. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site