3-5, on track for 4-8 in the regular season.
Now
Career arc
This week Wed Nov 4
- Last gameW 24-3 vs. Sam Houston Tue Oct 27
- This season3-5
- On track for4-8 regular season
- Nextat Florida International Sat Nov 7
- Stature128th of 138 FBS programs
Saturday: at Florida International
Sat Nov 7, 4 pm ET · Florida International is 3-5 · First meeting between Woods and Willie Simmons as head coaches · Missouri State’s chance to win: 39% (the site’s model)
His week
No headlines named him in the last 7 days
The headlines, Oct 28–Nov 4
Springfield News-LeaderWhy Casey Woods called Missouri State a 'fighting football team'Wed Oct 28
Offense: 92nd of 138 per play. Defense: 128th.
4 games left
- Sat Nov 7at Florida International (3-5)
39%
- Sat Nov 14vs. New Mexico State (3-5)
60%
- Sat Nov 21at Jacksonville State (6-2)16%
- Sat Nov 28vs. Liberty (7-1)6%
Percent: Missouri State’s chance to win, from the site’s model. Records are through today. Networks as announced; the rest are set closer to kickoff.
How the season got here
Where Missouri State stood among 138 FBS programs by stature after each game (1st is the highest; the CFB Zeitgeist ledger).
- Oct 26–Nov 1W 24-3 vs. Sam Houston1 headline · 87th of 138Why Casey Woods called Missouri State a 'fighting football team'
Springfield News-Leader - Oct 19–25L 38-61 at Delaware0 headlines
- Oct 12–18W 24-21 vs. Kennesaw State1 headline · 82nd of 138Casey Woods pushes for more Group of Six representation in expanded CFP
Springfield News-Leader - Oct 5–11L 13-34 at Western Kentucky1 headline · 83rd of 138
- Sep 28–Oct 4No game3 headlines · 70th of 138Casey Woods provides Missouri State football health update before taking on WKU
Yahoo Sports - Sep 21–27 · rebuiltL 24-34 at SMU5 headlines · 60th of 138
Each week as this page showed it at the time. Weeks marked rebuilt came before this page existed: they were built afterward from only what was known by the end of that week.
Watch the biggest plays from Missouri State’s games, ranked by how much each moved the chance to win.
Hot seat
See every job →This season
Our hot-seat model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, and his contract (a bigger buyout, relative to pay, makes a change costlier). Ranked against the 132 FBS head coaches with 3+ games this season.
His first rated season here.
His hot seat, week by week
The chance he’s out by the end of that season, as it stood after every week of his tenure here, by today’s model.
What drives his number
The biggest factors, each against the typical FBS job today.
- ▼ CoolerYear 1 · tenure, which this model overrates
(why?)
Tenure is one of this model’s strongest inputs, but its weight was set when retirements like Nick Saban’s and Bob Stoops’ still counted as being pushed out, so it overstates how much tenure matters.
- ▲ Hotter3-5, outscored by 52
- ▼ CoolerRegional Program program · the bar going in
What happened to coaches like him, 2004–2025
A different comparison: past coaches, not today’s, grouped by one fact at a time. Neither line knows the games he has left or his contract, so they can sit above or below his chance.
- Were 3-5 after 8 games
- 18% pushed out over results · of 379 coaches
- Were in year 1, after 8 games
- 1% pushed out over results · of 521 coaches
How good is this number? Checked on every FBS coach from 2010 to 2025, with its percentages calibrated each season on earlier years only: they track what happened — coaches it put near 25% were out about a quarter of the time — and a version pricing the games left with the previous season’s ratings ranked jobs as well as the ranking this page used before. Each week it learns from coaches who were still on the job at that point, so a firing during the season counts. In the Boiling zone it has run a few points high. Every job, and the method.
Poach watch
This winter
Our poach model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, his program, his pay and his background. Ranked against the 132 FBS head coaches this season. The zone words describe the market’s interest; none of them says he is leaving.
What drives his number
The biggest factors in his profile, each against the typical FBS head coach today. The games he has left are priced into the number, not listed here.
- ▼ LowerHis first season at Missouri State
- ▲ HigherNo record for him here before this season · his first year in the job
- ▲ HigherAge 46 · neither at his alma mater nor in the state he was born in
How good is this number? It ranks a head coach who leaves for another head-coaching job ahead of one who stays 78 to 82% of the time, and its average came within a point of the share who actually left. What it can’t do
Tested on every FBS head coach from 2012 through 2025, each season scored by a model fit only on the seasons before it. From three games on, given one coach who left for a head-coaching job elsewhere or an NFL coordinator job and one who stayed, it ranked the one who left ahead 79 to 82% of the time; in a season’s first two games, 78%. Its average chance came within a point of the share who actually left. It counts a move a coach makes while he still holds the job; when his school ends it, that doesn’t count, even if another school then hires him.
- The live number prices the games he has left with the power model’s ratings from this season. The test priced them with each team’s rating from the season before, because ratings made during past seasons were not kept, so this live version could not be replayed.
- Programs new to FBS have no FBS record before this season in the data it reads, so their coaches are scored without one.
- It is frozen: it learns nothing from 2026 until a deliberate refit.
- A coach hired in December needs his background (age, alma mater, the state he was born in) added before his first game, or he shows as not rated.
Fans
Fan chatter
- Oct 27W 24-3 vs. Sam Houston
Definitely not but I'd like 4 wins in Woods first year. Just don't think we have the talent this year. Mostly portal players.
Missouri State fan - Oct 14W 24-21 vs. Kennesaw State
Woods needs to start benching guys were in what week 7? And were still doing dumb s---
Missouri State fan - Sep 26L 24-34 at SMU
Got a feeling this isn't the last time we see Lashlee and Woods lock horns. Two damn good coaches
Missouri State fan
Earlier weeks
- Sep 19L 24-30 vs. Marshall
Here we go! Come on Woods/Locklear, work some magic
Missouri State fan - Sep 5L 0-50 at Texas A&M
I'm interested to see what the concepts of Casey Woods team looks like. I think he was a good hire
Missouri State fan

A few stories about him in the last 30 days
Sat Nov 7: Florida International
from a few outlets and r/CFB
Casey Woods pushes for more Group of Six representation in expanded CFP - Springfield News-Leader
Springfield News-Leader Oct 15 · one outlet
Many stories about him this season
from several outlets and r/CFB
Casey Woods provides Missouri State football injury update ahead of Marshall game
Springfield News-Leader +1 Sep 14 · a few outlets
All 3 articles
What they’re talking about
The headlines for each topic are on the News tab.
Could another school hire him? What has he said?
Stories are headlines grouped by what they are about, counted through Nov 4.
Stats
Big games
The big-game ledger
How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.
ATS is his record against the spread: did his team beat the closing betting line, winning by more than it or losing by less? Lines start in 2013; a dash means fewer than 6 of those games had one. One-score games carry no spread record: a big favorite that wins a close game has almost always failed to cover, so that number would say nothing about the coach.
Signature games





Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.
Style position and drift
Where each stint’s offense sat between run-first and pass-first, and how far it moved from one season to the next, against the FBS-wide average of 41% pass. The band is that stint’s real season-to-season range, not a fixed-width box.
Building the roster
Three numbers on how he actually stocks a roster, from signing day to draft day.
His recruiting, really
No class below is fully his yet — every one was inherited or signed mid-transition, so none counts toward a verdict.
Transition — he was hired mid-cycle
Rank is each signing class’s national recruiting rank (#1 is best). Only a class he had a full signing cycle to build counts as his; inherited and mid-transition classes still show here, faded, but stay out of the average.
Roster ownership
Roster ownership
of his 2026 roster arrived on his watch — 46 of 105 players. The other 59 are holdovers from before he was hired.
Of his own players on this roster, 24% came through the transfer portal; the rest are non-portal arrivals (high-school signees, JUCO transfers, walk-ons).
Everyone he has brought in, 2026–2026Counting players who have since left: 24% of the 46 arrivals we can classify came through the portal.
“His own” means the player arrived while he was head coach; “inherited” means a predecessor brought him in.
Where he recruits
is his biggest recruiting state: 4 of 18 signees (22%) across his 2026–2026 tenure, drawn from 7 states in all. Next: GA (4).
44% of his signees come from FL and its 2 border states (GA 4).
- median hometown distance
- 433 mi
- within 100 mi
- 5%
- within 500 mi
- 55%
- beyond 1,000 mi
- 14%
The map counts signed recruits across his tenure; the distance figures cover his current roster, transfers and walk-ons included. Two different groups, kept separate on purpose.
News
In his own words
Awaiting signal — no quotes collected from this staff yet this cycle.
Career
Hires into jobs like this
Hired into programs rated 7 to 8 (Regional Program V tier). Rough match, not calibrated yet — ranked on what the job inherited alone. Coaches hired into this same job aren’t used as comps.
Coaching career
The arc of his career is on Now.
Followed Ryan Beard (2025).
Brings in smaller-than-position-typical players than most.
Recruits younger transfers than most — more of a development bet.





