This week · as of Wed Nov 4

4-4, on track for 6-5 in the regular season.

Now

Career arc

Stature score reached, by season of his head-coaching careerFBS medianTexas StateUTSAUTSANational Programrespectable, streakyRegional Programthe building-block levelTexas State when he took over: 7.1 (Regional Program V), its final 2022 readingtook overTexas State, 2023: 8-5, Regional Program VTexas State, 2023: 8-5, Regional Program V20238-5Texas State, 2024: 8-5, Regional Program IV20248-5Texas State, 2025: 7-6, Regional Program III20257-6Texas State, 2026: 4-4, Regional Program IIITexas State, 2026: 4-4, Regional Program III20264-4+8.5best: 2025gray dashed: rival programs · ○ the program when he took over · Dashed segments are program changes — spacing is not proportional to calendar time

Bowls and playoffs: 3-0

2023First Responder BowlW 45-212024First Responder BowlW 30-282025Armed Forces BowlW 41-10

This week Wed Nov 4

  • Last gameL 45-46 at Boise State Sat Oct 31
  • This season4-4
  • On track for6-5 regular season
  • Nextat Oregon State Sat Nov 7
  • Stature92nd of 138 FBS programs

What the result changed

  • Playoff odds 2% → 0.9% CFB Zeitgeist forecast, before and after

Saturday: at Oregon State

Sat Nov 7, 10:30 pm ET The CW · Oregon State is 5-3 · First meeting between Kinne and JaMarcus Shephard as head coaches · Texas State’s chance to win: 50% (the site’s model)

No headlines named him in the last 7 days

What they are talking about, week and season

Offense: 22nd of 138 per play. Defense: 85th.

Offense, per play22ndPassing offense18thDefense, per play85thPass defense99thWorstBest
Offense, per play22nd of 138Passing offense18th of 138Defense, per play85th of 138Pass defense99th of 138WorstBest
Through 8 games. Each tick is an FBS team, adjusted for opponent strength (CFB Zeitgeist model); the dot is Texas State. The other two rows are where Texas State stands furthest from the middle. Early-season numbers move a lot.

3 games left

  1. Sat Nov 7at Oregon State (5-3)The CW50%
  2. Sat Nov 14vs. Fresno State (5-3)The CW62%
  3. Sat Nov 21vs. Washington State (1-8)USA Network88%

Percent: Texas State’s chance to win, from the site’s model. Records are through today. Networks as announced; the rest are set closer to kickoff.

How the season got here

Where Texas State stood among 138 FBS programs by stature after each game (1st is the highest; the CFB Zeitgeist ledger).

92nd98th104thPreseason101stTexas L 7-59Texas L 7-59L 7-59Texas98thUTSA L 26-31UTSA L 26-31L 26-31UTSA98thNorth Texas W 49-35North Texas W 49-35W 49-35North Texas98thIncarnate Word W 63-10Incarnate Word W 63-10W 63-10Incarnate Word98thSan Diego State L 29-31San Diego State L 29-31L 29-31San Diego Sta…98thColorado State W 66-27Colorado State W 66-27W 66-27Colorado State98thUtah State W 20-17Utah State W 20-17W 20-17Utah State95thBoise State L 45-46Boise State L 45-46L 45-46Boise State95thBye95th
  1. Oct 26–Nov 1L 45-46 at Boise State1 headline · 87th of 138
  2. Oct 19–25W 20-17 vs. Utah State0 headlines
  3. Oct 12–18W 66-27 vs. Colorado State1 headline · 82nd of 138
  4. Oct 5–11No game0 headlines
  5. Sep 28–Oct 4L 29-31 at San Diego State0 headlines
  6. Sep 21–27 · rebuiltW 63-10 vs. Incarnate Word0 headlines

Each week as this page showed it at the time. Weeks marked rebuilt came before this page existed: they were built afterward from only what was known by the end of that week.

Watch the biggest plays from Texas State’s games, ranked by how much each moved the chance to win.

Report card

Offense carries it: 91st percentile offense, bottom-quarter defense at 23rd.

Texas State, every completed season graded against the whole field, then averaged.

Offense

A+
of which —91st
efficiency — 91st percentile success rate, 2023–25
A87th
Standard-downs success
A88th
Passing-downs success
A86th
Trench push (line yards)
B60th
Red-zone scoring rate
B+72nd
Power-success (short yardage)
D22nd
Ball security (giveaways per game)

Defense

D
of which —23rd
23rd percentile SP+ defense, 2023–25
A+94th
Front-7 havoc
B-57th
Secondary havoc
A82nd
Stuff rate (run defense)
C+45th
Takeaways per game

Each season is his team’s percentile among every team with that stat (the share it beat), averaged over his completed seasons here; a mid-season takeover year and the season in progress aren’t graded. Letters: A+ 90th percentile and up, A 80, B+ 70, B 60, B− 50, C+ 45, C 40, C− 30, D 15, F below.

Poach watch

This winter

15%chance he leaves this winter for a head-coaching job elsewhere, or an NFL coordinator jobNoticed7th-highest of 132 FBS head coaches
0%50%+

Our poach model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, his program, his pay and his background. Ranked against the 132 FBS head coaches this season. The zone words describe the market’s interest; none of them says he is leaving.

What drives his number

The biggest factors in his profile, each against the typical FBS head coach today. The games he has left are priced into the number, not listed here.

  • ▲ Higher
    His 4th season at Texas State
  • ▲ Higher
    A Group of Five program · 28th percentile of FBS in program stature last season
  • ▲ Higher
    His team is 4-4, outscoring opponents by 6.1 points a game
How good is this number? It ranks a head coach who leaves for another head-coaching job ahead of one who stays 78 to 82% of the time, and its average came within a point of the share who actually left. What it can’t do

Tested on every FBS head coach from 2012 through 2025, each season scored by a model fit only on the seasons before it. From three games on, given one coach who left for a head-coaching job elsewhere or an NFL coordinator job and one who stayed, it ranked the one who left ahead 79 to 82% of the time; in a season’s first two games, 78%. Its average chance came within a point of the share who actually left. It counts a move a coach makes while he still holds the job; when his school ends it, that doesn’t count, even if another school then hires him.

  • The live number prices the games he has left with the power model’s ratings from this season. The test priced them with each team’s rating from the season before, because ratings made during past seasons were not kept, so this live version could not be replayed.
  • Programs new to FBS have no FBS record before this season in the data it reads, so their coaches are scored without one.
  • It is frozen: it learns nothing from 2026 until a deliberate refit.
  • A coach hired in December needs his background (age, alma mater, the state he was born in) added before his first game, or he shows as not rated.