We may have lost but Fette Wap in his first start as a true freshman threw for more TDs and score more points against BYU than “Heisman Contender” Noah Fajita
Also Sam Leavitt is a bitch
the kick return Arizona State just did needs to be studied in a lab
You think BYU of all schools would pride themselves on not booing an injured player lol
Fan mood · last 3 weeks · more negative than 3 in 4 FBS fan bases
Offense: 108th of 138 per play. Defense: 71st.
Through 8 games. Each tick is an FBS team, adjusted for opponent strength (CFB Zeitgeist model); the dot is Arizona State. The other two rows are where Arizona State stands furthest from the middle. Early-season numbers move a lot.
4 games left
Sat Nov 7vs. COLOColorado (3-5)70%
Sat Nov 14at UCFUCF (4-4)53%
Sat Nov 21vs. OKSTOklahoma State (5-3)52%
Sat Nov 28at ARIZArizona (6-2)14%
Percent: Arizona State’s chance to win, from the site’s model. Records are through today. Networks as announced; the rest are set closer to kickoff.
How the season got here
Where Arizona State stood among 138 FBS programs by stature after each game (1st is the highest; the CFB Zeitgeist ledger).
Each week as this page showed it at the time. Weeks marked rebuilt came before this page existed: they were built afterward from only what was known by the end of that week.
Each season is his team’s percentile among every team with that stat (the share it beat), averaged over his completed seasons here; a mid-season takeover year and the season in progress aren’t graded. Letters: A+ 90th percentile and up, A 80, B+ 70, B 60, B− 50, C+ 45, C 40, C− 30, D 15, F below.
4%chance he’s out by the end of this seasonCool63rd-hottest of 132 FBS jobs
0%50%+
Our hot-seat model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, and his contract (a bigger buyout, relative to pay, makes a change costlier). Ranked against the 132 FBS head coaches with 3+ games this season.
All three of his finished seasons here ended Cool. Now right where 2025 was at this point.
How his seat has moved, and why
His hot seat, week by week
The chance he’s out by the end of that season, as it stood after every week of his tenure here, by today’s model.
← swipe for earlier seasons
Earlier seasons price the games left with power ratings rebuilt after those seasons ended.
What drives his number
The biggest factors, each against the typical FBS job today.
▲ Hotter
Year 4· tenure, which this model overrates(why?)
Tenure is one of this model’s strongest inputs, but its weight was set when retirements like Nick Saban’s and Bob Stoops’ still counted as being pushed out, so it overstates how much tenure matters.
▼ Cooler
19-8 over his previous two seasons here
▲ Hotter
4-4, even on points
What happened to coaches like him, 2004–2025
A different comparison: past coaches, not today’s, grouped by one fact at a time. Neither line knows the games he has left or his contract, so they can sit above or below his chance.
Were 4-4 after 8 games
8% pushed out over results · of 504 coaches
Were in years 3-4, after 8 games
13% pushed out over results · of 754 coaches
The outcome
Pushed out over results — a firing, forced resignation, mutual parting or non-renewal, each read case by case. Leaving for a better job, or retiring on his own terms, doesn’t count.
Buyout
$24,683,333USA Today estimate (Oct. 2025) — not a disclosed figure· 3.3× total pay· a large buyout, which lowers his chance of being let go
How good is this number? Checked on every FBS coach from 2010 to 2025, with its percentages calibrated each season on earlier years only: they track what happened — coaches it put near 25% were out about a quarter of the time — and a version pricing the games left with the previous season’s ratings ranked jobs as well as the ranking this page used before. Each week it learns from coaches who were still on the job at that point, so a firing during the season counts. In the Boiling zone it has run a few points high. Every job, and the method.
Our poach model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, his program, his pay and his background. Ranked against the 132 FBS head coaches this season. The zone words describe the market’s interest; none of them says he is leaving.
What drives his number
The biggest factors in his profile, each against the typical FBS head coach today. The games he has left are priced into the number, not listed here.
▲ Higher
His 4th season at Arizona State
▲ Higher
A Power Four program · 74th percentile of FBS in program stature last season
▼ Lower
Age 46 · coaching at his alma mater
How good is this number? It ranks a head coach who leaves for another head-coaching job ahead of one who stays 78 to 82% of the time, and its average came within a point of the share who actually left. What it can’t do
Tested on every FBS head coach from 2012 through 2025, each season scored by a model fit only on the seasons before it. From three games on, given one coach who left for a head-coaching job elsewhere or an NFL coordinator job and one who stayed, it ranked the one who left ahead 79 to 82% of the time; in a season’s first two games, 78%. Its average chance came within a point of the share who actually left. It counts a move a coach makes while he still holds the job; when his school ends it, that doesn’t count, even if another school then hires him.
The live number prices the games he has left with the power model’s ratings from this season. The test priced them with each team’s rating from the season before, because ratings made during past seasons were not kept, so this live version could not be replayed.
Programs new to FBS have no FBS record before this season in the data it reads, so their coaches are scored without one.
It is frozen: it learns nothing from 2026 until a deliberate refit.
A coach hired in December needs his background (age, alma mater, the state he was born in) added before his first game, or he shows as not rated.
Fans
Fan chatter
Oct 31L 20-27 at BYUYou know, I hope Dillingham and Sitake stay where they are, and play each other for the next 20 years. Both coaches fit great at their current school.ASUArizona State fan
Oct 24W 28-17 vs. Kansas StateWhy would he wish that on Kenny dillinghamASUArizona State fan
Oct 17L 25-53 at Texas TechCutter Boley was having people bring up the hot seat conversation for kenny dillinghamASUArizona State fan
Earlier weeks
Oct 3L 19-55 vs. BaylorIn terms of expectations and it being year 4 of Kenny Dillingham this bas been so far the worst team under him I’ve seenASUArizona State fan
Sep 19W 24-17 vs. KansasKenny Dillingham middle 8 masterclassASUArizona State fan
Sep 12L 20-48 at Texas A&MKenny “Don’t You Sub Late On Me” DillinghamASUArizona State fan
Many stories about him this week
Sat Nov 7: Colorado
23rd of 104 FBS head coaches · from several outlets and r/CFB
Gold: stories about him each day. W and L: his games.
Gold: stories we tracked each season, drawn on a square-root scale so a quiet year still shows. Hatched: before we started tracking (2025). Earlier years had thinner coverage, so compare within a stop, not across decades.
Stories are headlines grouped by what they are about, counted through Nov 4.
Stats
Big games
The big-game ledger
How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.
1-2 against his rivals. Just 1-2 against Joey McGuire.
33% win rate across a real, 3-meeting series — short of the bar this site uses before badging a series “Nemesis.” Shown here as the toughest matchup on record, not an algorithmic crown.
Performance by opponent class
Power Program
5-9 35.7%ATS 8-6 14 of 14
National Program
11-11 50.0%ATS 13-9 22 of 22
Regional Program
7-1 87.5%ATS 6-1-1 8 of 8
ATS is his record against the spread: did his team beat the closing betting line, winning by more than it or losing by less? Lines start in 2013; a dash means fewer than 6 of those games had one. One-score games carry no spread record: a big favorite that wins a close game has almost always failed to cover, so that number would say nothing about the coach.
Signature games
6-8 vs. AP top 25 · 1-6 vs. the top 10
Every AP-ranked regular-season opponent, by rank (#1 at top) and year
’23’24’25’26
win loss · higher = higher-ranked opponent · dashed line = top 10
Signature wins
WAR
Arizona · 2024
49-7
RivalQuality opponent
WIS
Iowa State · 2024
45-19
UpsetQuality opponentConference title game
WUC
UCLA · 2023
17-7
UpsetQuality opponent
Signature losses
LAR
Arizona · 2023
23-59
Rival
LAR
Arizona · 2025
7-23
Rival
LTE
Texas · 2024
31-39
Bowl/CFP stakes
Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.
Called about what the situation called for under every play-caller.
2,650 run and pass snaps at Arizona State, 2023–2025, his own games, one row per offensive coordinator. Each cell is how much more often he passed than the rest of FBS did in the same situation (field zone, down, distance, score, quarter, same season), in percentage points.
passed moreran morewithin noise (95% range includes 0)
Pass rate, stint by stint
Where each stint’s offense sat between run-first and pass-first, and how far it moved from one season to the next, against the FBS-wide average of 41% pass. The band is that stint’s real season-to-season range, not a fixed-width box.
Pass rate — share of offensive plays that were pass attemptsfirst covered seasonmost recent covered seasonfull season-to-season range (3+ covered seasons)
How much that is, against every other stint
Season-to-season pass-rate range for all 449 FBS coaching stints with at least three covered seasons, 2004–2025.
Typical stint7.010.3 median14.8middle half of all stints
Arizona State14.4pt#119 of 449 · a typical amount
Building the roster
Five numbers on how he actually stocks a roster, from signing day to draft day.
His 4 ranked Arizona State classes of his own have averaged #44 nationally — best #40, worst #48.
2023
#44
His class
2024
#48
His class
2025
#44
His class
2026
#40
His class
His class — he had the full signing cycle
Rank is each signing class’s national recruiting rank (#1 is best). Only a class he had a full signing cycle to build counts as his.
Roster ownership
Roster ownership
99%His own players
of his 2026 roster arrived on his watch — 106 of 107 players. The other 1 is a holdover from before he was hired.
Arrived under him 106Inherited 1
Of his own players on this roster, 29% came through the transfer portal; the rest are non-portal arrivals (high-school signees, JUCO transfers, walk-ons).
New players each season, 2023–2026
37% of his 229 new players since 2023 came through the portal (FBS programs, same seasons: 26%) — the 9th-highest share of the 68 Power 4 programs. His share was 33% in 2023 and 38% in 2026.
Graded on the players who arrived and the players who left together, his portal seasons came out better than most FBS programs’ in 2 of the 4 seasons graded. our read
202326 of 78Portal grade: better than most — #22 of 130 FBS programs that season
202427 of 60Portal grade: about typical for FBS that season
202513 of 43Portal grade: about typical for FBS that season
202618 of 48Portal grade: better than most — #22 of 136 FBS programs that season
Came through the portalNon-portal arrivalsFBS-wide share that season
Each player counts once, in the season he arrived. 2021, the first season of portal tracking here, is left off because its arrival records look incomplete (about 31 new players per FBS team, against 52 in 2022). Portal grade: the site’s position-value-weighted scoring (the same engine as the Portal Heat feed and the “Who won the portal” grade): the value of the players who came in minus the value of the ones who left, ranked against every FBS program’s grade that same season. A season with fewer than 4 transfers in and out is not graded.
“His own” means the player arrived while he was head coach; “inherited” means a predecessor brought him in.
Size up front
Size up front
+6 lbAgainst the FBS average
Offensive linemen on his Arizona State rosters have averaged 6 lb heavier than the FBS average (2023–2026) — heavier than 79% of FBS coaching runs since 2010. In the three seasons before he arrived, Arizona State’s line averaged 4 lb lighter than the FBS average.
Arizona State2023–2026+6 lb
−10FBS avg+10lb
His seasonsSame program, the seasons before he arrivedMiddle half of FBS coaching runs since 2010
Average listed weight of every offensive lineman on each season’s roster, holdovers included, against every FBS roster that season (2010 on; a program needs 3+ seasons under him to appear). Weights are the ones programs publish, and programs list differently. This describes size only — not scheme, and not quality.
Where he recruits
TXTop state
is his biggest recruiting state: 25 of 88 signees (28%) across his 2023–2026 tenure, drawn from 17 states in all. Next: CA (21).
Where his signees came from, 2023–2026 (88 high-school, JUCO and prep signees)
38% of his signees come from TX and its 4 border states (LA 5, OK 2, NM 1).
Off this map: 3 signees to the north (WA 3) and 1 to the east (FL).
By region
West
49
South
34
Midwest
5
Roster distance from campus (Mountain America Stadium, AZ)
median hometown distance
860 mi
within 100 mi
14%
within 500 mi
39%
beyond 1,000 mi
36%
103 of 107 roster players with a known hometown (96% coverage)
The map counts signed recruits across his tenure; the distance figures cover his current roster, transfers and walk-ons included. Two different groups, kept separate on purpose.
The NFL pipeline
The NFL pipeline
5Drafted
players drafted into the NFL off his teams here. He brought in 5 of them himself. 2 went in the first round.
His recruits 5Inherited 05 roster-verified · 0 estimated
Most recent picks first
Year
Pick
Player
Pos
NFL team
Note
2026
R1.08
Jordyn Tyson
Wide Receiver
New Orleans Saints
2026
R1.21
Max Iheanachor
Offensive Tackle
Pittsburgh Steelers
2026
R5.17
Keith Abney II
Cornerback
Detroit Lions
2026
R5.26
Keyshaun Elliott
Linebacker
Chicago Bears
2025
R4.03
Cam Skattebo
Running Back
New York Giants
A pick counts toward his tenure when the player’s final college season was one he coached, a checkable rule rather than a claim about who developed the player. A blank note means the player is on a verified roster and arrived on his watch. “Estimated” means no roster record, so the final season is assumed to be the year before the draft.
News
Stories about him
Headlines, grouped by what they are about. Each is the outlet’s own.
You can tell we’re not going to quit as an organization, as a program
The referees came over and said [Wilson] asked if we could shorten the quarter, and I said, ‘Yeah, of course, whatever he wants, we will do,’
Today was a really good day with how we structured practice and allowed the quarterbacks to really get a good beat on what we’re going to see. Almost more game plan-y
Today was a really good day with how we structured practice and allowed the quarterbacks to really get a good beat on what we’re going to see. Almost more game plan-y
Kenny Dillingham moved Arizona State from National Program II to National Program I in 4 seasons.
+5.2 pts over 4 seasons · top 13% of 3-5-season tenures (717 in sample)
10th-best Arizona State tenure of 19 by the numbers.
Followed Shaun Aguano (2022).
System Shift, on arrival
swipe to see every season
Season
2023
2024
2025
2026
Trend
Record & result
Record
3-9
11-3
8-5
4-4
Postseason
—
CFP loss
L bowl
—
Coordinators
OC
Beau Baldwin
Marcus Arroyo
Marcus Arroyo
Marcus Arroyo
DC
Brian Ward
Brian Ward
Brian Ward
Brian Ward
Outcome — opponent-adjusted efficiency percentile
Offense
18
95
28
23
Defense
13
63
69
70
Tendencies — play-by-play, neutral script
1st-down pass%
52.4
37.7
37.0
51.8
Red-zone pass%
35.4
29.0
42.5
54.4
4th-down go%opp. territory
50.0
48.1
36.7
21.7
Recruiter or developer?
Performs about as expected for his recruiting talent, on both sides of the ball.
Offense vs. talent
-10.4 pts
#152 of 208 · middle half
Defense vs. talent
-8.2 pts
#140 of 208 · middle half
Recruiting talent is team-wide (no offense/defense split exists in the source data) -- both sides are scored against the same talent input, only the outcome is side-specific.
Who they bring in
Brings in bigger-than-position-typical players than most.
A typical class-year mix of incoming transfers.
Avg. size (raw)
6′2″, 240 lbs
across 84 of 99 arrivals — unadjusted for position mix
Size vs. position-typical
+7.2 lbs
#50 of 255 · top quarter
Avg. class year
Jr
#116 of 255 · middle half
Avg. portal rating
3.1★
rated arrivals only
Top states: TX (16), AZ (14), CA (13), FL (7), LA (6)
Notable portal arrivals with a modeled NIL value
Sam Leavitt On3 modeled · $4,500,000Raleek Brown On3 modeled · $1,000,000Cutter Boley On3 modeled · $1,500,000
On3’s modeled estimate (social reach / exposure), not money actually paid — shown per player, never totaled.
Who won the portal our read
Talent added
61.1
position-weighted
Talent lost
63.3
position-weighted
Net
-2.2
arrivals minus departures
Best addition: Sam Leavitt (QB) from Michigan State
Biggest loss: Sam Leavitt (QB) to LSU
Position-value-weighted (QB/CB weighted highest, depth-decayed within each position) — the same scoring engine as the Portal Heat feed, not a separate grade.
Does the system survive a coordinator change?
OC: Beau Baldwin → Marcus Arroyo · 2024
1-season window either side — numbers shown, not enough to badge a verdict.
1st-down pass rate: 52.4% → 37.7% (-14.7 pts)
Confound, shown not hidden: only 62% of offensive production returned the year the coordinator changed — the roster turned over at the same time, not just the play-caller.
Where the roster comes from, by position
Buys Kicker via the portal
100%
#1 of 56 stints
Buys Athlete via the portal
25%
#17 of 146 stints
Postseason detail2024: Lost to Texas 31-39 College Football Playoff Quarterfinal at the Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl2025: Lost to Duke 39-42 Tony the Tiger Sun Bowl
Coach of the Year: Big 12 Chuck Neinas Coach of the Year (2024)
1 player-season honored (All-America / national award): Cam Skattebo (2024)
Every angle here comes back inconclusive — not enough separation from zero to call it either way.
Raised the program
AS+5.2 pts at Arizona State · #376 of 1290 · middle half
Beat his talent
Offense vs. talent
-10.4 pts
#152 of 208 · middle half · 3 covered seasons
Defense vs. talent
-8.2 pts
#140 of 208 · middle half · 3 covered seasons
His own effect, isolated?
Offense marginal impact
-0.01
not distinguishable from zero
Defense marginal impact
-0.03
not distinguishable from zero
Model fit as of 2026-09-04.
Coordinator years
Offensive coordinator across 4 programs, 4 stints, before and after wearing the head-coach hat — every season measured on the same axis, whether he personally ran the unit or someone else did.
How to read this. Coordinator seasons come from our coordinator career records; head-coaching-era seasons are the same unit's FBS-relative percentile for those years, regardless of who coached it, read directly from the staff assignments record. A role change (a “hinge”) is a fact, never a performance verdict — only the season-by-season data itself is colored by outcome.