Hudson Habermehl

#81 · TE · Sr. · UCLA6′7″ · 245 lb · Roseville, CA

Hudson Habermehl is a tight end who has not played this season; the last season with a stat line was 2025, at UCLA.

Habermehl shows up in the passing game from any alignment. Played for two head coaches in three seasons at UCLA. A game that shows it: 35 receiving yards and 3 receptions against Michigan State — Week 7, 2025.

Style of play

Play style

No single go-to route — the receiving numbers show up inline and split out alike.

Similar players

Closest statistical matches, adjusted for opponent strength.

Keaton UpshawGeorgia Southern · 2023 · 85% season match
Keleki LatuNevada · 2023 · 78% season match
Trey MillerLouisiana · 2025 · 70% season match
Cameron BallBuffalo · 2023 · 65% season match
Luke LacheyIowa · 2024 · 62% season match

Where to follow

Career stats

Swipe the table sideways for more columns.

Season	Team
2025	UCLA	20	138	6.9	0	26
2023	UCLA	9	148	16.4	3	45
2022	UCLA	15	167	11.1	2	51
Career		44	453	10.3	5	51

Game log

Game log · Week-by-week

2025 season · 10 games

Box score · CFBD

Swipe the table sideways for more columns.

Wk	Opp	REC	YDS	AVG	LONG	Note
Wk 1	L 10-43vs Utah	1	9	9.0	9
Wk 3	L 10-35vs New Mexico	4	20	5.0	9
Wk 5	L 14-17@ Northwestern	2	20	10.0	11
Wk 6	W 42-37vs No. 7 Penn State	1	6	6.0	6
Wk 7	W 38-13@ Michigan State	3	35	11.7	26	Season-high 35 yds
Wk 8	W 20-17vs Maryland	2	6	3.0	7
Wk 9	L 6-56@ No. 2 Indiana	2	9	4.5	5
Wk 11	L 21-28vs Nebraska	1	11	11.0	11
Wk 13	L 14-48vs Washington	1	5	5.0	5
Wk 14	L 10-29@ No. 19 USC	3	17	5.7	8
Total		20	138	6.9	26

Signature game

Week 7 · 2025

W 38-13

at Michigan State

3 rec · 35 yds

Dominant 25-point win on the road against Michigan State.

With N. Iamaleava — 180 yds · 3 TD · 0 INT · QBR 53.6 · J. Berger — 89 rush yds (12 car) · 1 TD · 3 rec · 24 yds · 2 TD

Signature plays

The plays that mattered most

Week 7 · Michigan State · 3rd and 8 · Q1 · EPA +3.40Nico Iamaleava pass complete to Hudson Habermehl for 26 yds to the MSU 47 for a
Week 11 · Nebraska · 3rd and 11 · Q2 · EPA +1.40Iamaleava to Habermehl: an 11-yard pass.
Week 3 · New Mexico · 2nd and 2 · Q4 · EPA −0.88Nico Iamaleava pass complete to Hudson Habermehl for no gain to the UNM 34
Week 8 · Maryland · 1st and 10 · Q3 · EPA −0.83Nico Iamaleava pass complete to Hudson Habermehl for a loss of 1 yard to the MD 35
Week 1 · Utah · 3rd and 10 · Q1 · EPA +0.71Nico Iamaleava pass complete to Hudson Habermehl for 9 yds to the 50 yard line
Week 3 · New Mexico · 1st and 10 · Q2 · EPA +0.62Nico Iamaleava pass complete to Hudson Habermehl for 9 yds to the UNM 8

4 more plays

Week 14 · USC · 2nd and 4 · Q3 · EPA +0.59Iamaleava to Habermehl: an 8-yard pass.
Week 3 · New Mexico · 1st and 10 · Q2 · EPA +0.37Nico Iamaleava pass complete to Hudson Habermehl for 6 yds to the UNM 48
Week 6 · Penn State · 1st and 10 · Q2 · EPA +0.28Nico Iamaleava pass complete to Hudson Habermehl for 6 yds to the PSU 36
Week 8 · Maryland · 2nd and 10 · Q4 · EPA +0.17Nico Iamaleava pass complete to Hudson Habermehl for 7 yds to the UCLA 17

Receiving profile

Receiver profile · Targets, catch rate, and throw depth

How often he's targeted, and how well it works

20 rec · 138 yds · 0 TD

19 of 20 receptions matched to play-by-play

12 of 28 targets charted for true throw depth

Targets

288% of team targets

Catch rate

68%19 of 28 targets

Behind LOS · Negative air yds

8% of targets (1)

100%catch rate

Air -2.0 · YAC 7.0 avg

Short · 0–9 air yds

92% of targets (11)

55%catch rate

Air 3.8 · YAC 2.5 avg

68% catch rate on 28 targets · 8% of the team's targets.

Situational

Situational · Share of own targets (PBP, 2025)

Third-down role

38%10 of his 26 targets came on third down · TE median is 22%

Teams and coaches

2022UCLA9-4HC: Chip Kelly · Run-leaning

2023UCLA8-5HC: Chip Kelly · Run-leaning

2025UCLA3-9HC: Deshaun Foster and Tim Skipper · Balanced, slow tempo

Our ratings

CFB Zeitgeist Score 33 (#138 of 156). Show the ratings

Where this profile ranks vs the TE cohort

Box-score + play-by-play EPA percentiles · 2025 season

33Below cohort / limited sample #138 of 156 · 2025?

10 metrics · season cumulative

2025 score: the 2026 sample is not big enough yet. The rows below are 2026 so far. Concern: epa / target (6th percentile).

Real play-by-play efficiency

Catch rate#248 / 798 · 69th pct

73.1%

TD rate#507 / 798 · 18th pct

0.0%

Explosive rate#693 / 798 · 13th pct

3.8%

Yards / catch#746 / 798 · 7th pct

6.8

EPA / target#747 / 798 · 6th pct

0.05

Box-score rates (5)

Receptions#102 / 175 · 39th pct

Long catch#134 / 175 · 23rd pct

Rec yards#152 / 175 · 13th pct

138

Rec TDs#152 / 175 · 7th pct

Yards / catch#170 / 175 · 3rd pct

6.9

Season trend

EPA / target— first qualifying season

Explosive rate— first qualifying season

Catch rate— first qualifying season

TD rate— first qualifying season

Yards / catch— first qualifying season

Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps in 2025. Most bars are box-score rates; EPA / success-rate bars are computed from real play-by-play (offense only — no defensive EPA model exists yet).

Splits

Home and road splits, scheme and staff

Splits · Per-game

2025 season · 10 games

Home/Road · Season halves

Home vs Road

	REC/g	YDS/g	YPR	TD/g
Home6g	1.7	9.5	6.5	0.0
Road4g	2.5	20.2	8.0	0.0

First half vs Second half

	REC/g	YDS/g	YPR	TD/g
Weeks 1-75g	2.2	18.0	8.3	0.0
Weeks 8+5g	1.8	9.6	5.8	0.0

Supporting cast · Scheme

Staff and system around the player

2025 season

Head Coach

Tim Skipper

Pass share

48.9%

358 pass / 374 run

Plays / game

61.0

12 games

Team sack rate

6.7%

388 dropbacks · PBP

Scheme: Balanced, slow tempo.

Awards

Player standing · 2025

20 catches in 10 games

Fewer catches a game than most FBS tight ends who play every week.

Recognition

Roster2-deepStarterRecognizedEliteApex

Production · CFB Zeitgeist Score

33 · #138 of 156 TEs · 2025

2026 outlook

Outside shot for All-Big Ten

Based on 2025: #23 of 26 Big Ten TEs

How the All-Big Ten base rate is computed

A base rate for the rank, not a forecast of this player: 15% of returning players who ranked #21 or lower at their position in their conference made an all-conference team the next season (95% confidence interval 13–17%).