Game log · Week-by-week
2022 season · 1 game
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 2 | L 10-33@ Wyoming | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 | Season-high 8 yds |
| Total | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 |
#13
TJ Graham
Senior wide receiver for Texas State. 2021: 20 catches, 290 receiving yards, 3 TD.
6′1″ · 191 lb · Mansfield, TX
CFB Index 36 · #345 of 468 WRsHigh confidenceTexas State 2021 alumnus
CFB Index
A single number blending on-field production (an EPA-based value lane) with box-score output for this player's position.
0-100, scaled within each position's own cohort — not directly comparable across positions.
Recruiting
3★
WR recruit
No. 2097 nationally · Signed with Texas State
No college snaps yet.
His career numbers, season by seasonThe story
4 wide receiver for Texas State. 2021: 20 catches, 290 receiving yards, 3 TD.
- Signed as a 3-star recruit to Texas State in 2018.
TJ Graham
Moves the chains on third down. TJ Graham has played for two head coaches in four seasons at Texas State. The receipt: 8 rec yds, 6 pass yds against Wyoming — Week 2, 2022.
Low coverage — composed from the verified record.
- positional archetype classification
- head-coach lineage
- game log
How it ended
Four seasons at Texas State, 945 receiving yards — his college career is complete.
His career
He was on the field for 5 seasons. That is rarer than it sounds.
The week the volume broke through — put up 69 yds at Eastern Michigan.Eastern Michigan · L 21-592021
20183 games
- Signed with Texas State3-star out of Lake Ridge
2022
The snaps went the other way.
- Entered the portal
Career arc
HS
Recruit
★★★
CFB
College
Texas State
NFL
NFL Draft
—
Coaching lineage · 2018–2021
2 coaches2018
Chris Woods
Texas State
Coaching transition mid-career: Chris Woods → Jake Spavital. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
2022 snapshot
Season context · Team result + system
2018Texas State3-9HC: Chris Woods · Run-leaning
2019Texas State3-9HC: Jake Spavital · Pass-leaning
2020Texas State2-10HC: Jake Spavital · Balanced
2021Texas State4-8HC: Jake Spavital · Run-leaning
Splits & context
Splits
Per-game splits
Through 1 game: 1.0 REC/g, 8.0 YDS/g, 8.0 YPR, 0.0 TD/g — splits start at 3 games.
Supporting cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
G.J. Kinne
Scheme reads (pass share, tempo, sack rate) need at least 3 team games — 2 games in so far.
Career stats
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Texas State | 20 | 290 | 14.5 | 3 | -- |
| 2020 | Texas State | 24 | 271 | 11.3 | 2 | -- |
| 2019 | Texas State | 28 | 353 | 12.6 | 4 | -- |
| 2018 | Texas State | 1 | 31 | 31.0 | 0 | -- |
| Career | 73 | 945 | 12.9 | 9 | -- |
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Texas State | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| 2020 | Texas State | 1 | 4 | -- | -- | -- |
| 2019 | Texas State | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| 2018 | Texas State | 2 | 35 | -- | -- | -- |
| Career | 3 | 39 | -- | -- | -- |
Game log
How he plays
Play style
Reliable target who converts on critical downs. Not flashy; consistently productive.
CFB Index positional classification
DNA match
Player DNA
Possession Receiver
Reliable target who converts on critical downs. Not flashy; consistently productive.
WR
His 2021 production profile sits closest to Adonicas Sanders’s 2021 season.
Matches Adonicas on
EPA / play (adj)
Total EPA (college ability)
Recruiting rating
Differs from Adonicas on
TD rate (higher)
Through 2 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Devin Gandy’s path through Louisiana Tech.
100%match
All-Conference USA
#3
Anthony Lowe
98%
#4
Taylor Grimes
96%
#5
Ryan Flournoy
NFL Rd 6
95%
Matches Devin on
Height
Weight
Yards per reception
As a senior, his production profile tracks closest to Adonicas Sanders's senior season at Georgia Tech (2021).
Matches Adonicas on
EPA / play (adj)
Total EPA (college ability)
Recruiting rating
Differs from Adonicas on
TD rate (higher)
Player DNA
Players who play like TJ Graham
Stats from CFBD · ESPN · fan discourse. Every figure computed from source tables — not invented. Methodology