Playoff odds0.2% → <0.1%CFB Zeitgeist forecast, before and after
Win and he’s at 5%. Lose and he’s at 9%.
at Houston, Sat Nov 7, 3:30 pm ET · HOUNo. 17 Houston is 6-2 · Satterfield vs. Willie Fritz: 1-1 (not counting 1 game in seasons either team changed coaches) · Cincinnati’s chance to win: 16% (the site’s model)
If Cincinnati wins: 5%, 54th of 132
Now: 9%
If Cincinnati loses: 9%, 40th of 132
His chance of being out after the season, now and after Saturday. Each tick is an FBS head coach’s number today; ranks are against today’s field. From the site’s hot-seat model.
Is he getting fired?
9%chance he’s out after the season · 40th of 132 FBS head coaches · Cool
Dark line: his number after each game; a small dot just before a game is where it stood at kickoff, after other results moved it. Gray: where it could go, 8 seasons in 10 (darker, the middle half). The hollow dot: had his last game gone the other way. From the site’s hot-seat model.
If he finishes…
Bar: how likely that finish isNumber: his chance of being out
5-716%
6-610%
7-56%
8-43%
9-32%
Why his number is where it is
Our hot-seat model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, and his contract (a bigger buyout, relative to pay, makes a change costlier). Ranked against the 132 FBS head coaches with 3+ games this season.
All three of his finished seasons here ended Cool. Now right where 2025 was at this point.
His hot seat, week by week
The chance he’s out by the end of that season, as it stood after every week of his tenure here, by today’s model.
← swipe for earlier seasons
Earlier seasons price the games left with power ratings rebuilt after those seasons ended.
What drives his number
The biggest factors, each against the typical FBS job today.
▲ Hotter
Year 4· tenure, which this model overrates(why?)
Tenure is one of this model’s strongest inputs, but its weight was set when retirements like Nick Saban’s and Bob Stoops’ still counted as being pushed out, so it overstates how much tenure matters.
▲ Hotter
National Program program · the bar going in
▼ Cooler
5-3, outscoring opponents by 39
What happened to coaches like him, 2004–2025
A different comparison: past coaches, not today’s, grouped by one fact at a time. Neither line knows the games he has left or his contract, so they can sit above or below his chance.
Were 5-3 after 8 games
5% pushed out over results · of 502 coaches
Were in years 3-4, after 8 games
13% pushed out over results · of 754 coaches
The outcome
Pushed out over results — a firing, forced resignation, mutual parting or non-renewal, each read case by case. Leaving for a better job, or retiring on his own terms, doesn’t count.
Buyout
$12,008,333reported, USA Today, Oct. 2025· 3.2× total pay· an average buyout, which barely moves his chance
How good is this number? Checked on every FBS coach from 2010 to 2025, with its percentages calibrated each season on earlier years only: they track what happened — coaches it put near 25% were out about a quarter of the time — and a version pricing the games left with the previous season’s ratings ranked jobs as well as the ranking this page used before. Each week it learns from coaches who were still on the job at that point, so a firing during the season counts. In the Boiling zone it has run a few points high. Every job, and the method.
Parking free at Woodside today? it was my first time using the parking garage wood side garage by the library. I parked for 7ish hours and had my ticket was ready to pay but as I was attempting to scan my ticket at the exit the barrier just opened and I was able to drive through? was it due to Election Day and the polls in the langsam library?
Has anyone here interviewed with Idaho National Laboratory for engineering? If yes, could I ask a few questions?
CCM MM: Music Theory I'm looking at applying to the Masters of Music in Music Theory program. Any tips/advice on the application, the pre-screening, or just in general that you can muster from your time at CCM? Thanks!
Fan mood · last 3 weeks · more upbeat than 3 in 4 FBS fan bases
Offense: 19th of 138 per play. Defense: 114th.
Through 8 games. Each tick is an FBS team, adjusted for opponent strength (CFB Zeitgeist model); the dot is Cincinnati. The other two rows are where Cincinnati stands furthest from the middle. Early-season numbers move a lot.
4 games left
Sat Nov 7at HOUHouston (6-2)16%
Sat Nov 14at ISUIowa State (4-4)64%
Sat Nov 21vs. COLOColorado (3-5)72%
Sat Nov 28at BYUBYU (7-1)22%
Percent: Cincinnati’s chance to win, from the site’s model. Records are through today. Networks as announced; the rest are set closer to kickoff.
How the season got here
Where Cincinnati stood among 138 FBS programs by stature after each game (1st is the highest; the CFB Zeitgeist ledger).
Each week as this page showed it at the time. Weeks marked rebuilt came before this page existed: they were built afterward from only what was known by the end of that week.
Each season is his team’s percentile among every team with that stat (the share it beat), averaged over his completed seasons here; a mid-season takeover year and the season in progress aren’t graded. Letters: A+ 90th percentile and up, A 80, B+ 70, B 60, B− 50, C+ 45, C 40, C− 30, D 15, F below.
Our poach model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, his program, his pay and his background. Ranked against the 132 FBS head coaches this season. The zone words describe the market’s interest; none of them says he is leaving.
What drives his number
The biggest factors in his profile, each against the typical FBS head coach today. The games he has left are priced into the number, not listed here.
▲ Higher
His 4th season at Cincinnati
▼ Lower
12-13 over his previous two seasons here
How good is this number? It ranks a head coach who leaves for another head-coaching job ahead of one who stays 78 to 82% of the time, and its average came within a point of the share who actually left. What it can’t do
Tested on every FBS head coach from 2012 through 2025, each season scored by a model fit only on the seasons before it. From three games on, given one coach who left for a head-coaching job elsewhere or an NFL coordinator job and one who stayed, it ranked the one who left ahead 79 to 82% of the time; in a season’s first two games, 78%. Its average chance came within a point of the share who actually left. It counts a move a coach makes while he still holds the job; when his school ends it, that doesn’t count, even if another school then hires him.
The live number prices the games he has left with the power model’s ratings from this season. The test priced them with each team’s rating from the season before, because ratings made during past seasons were not kept, so this live version could not be replayed.
Programs new to FBS have no FBS record before this season in the data it reads, so their coaches are scored without one.
It is frozen: it learns nothing from 2026 until a deliberate refit.
A coach hired in December needs his background (age, alma mater, the state he was born in) added before his first game, or he shows as not rated.
Fans
Fan chatter
Oct 31L 25-49 vs. UtahGood job Satterfield, I hope NC State and Baylor steal you awayCINCincinnati fan
Oct 24W 37-24 vs. Texas TechIf UC wins I’ll be happy if Texas tech wins by a lot and gets Satterfield fired I’ll also be happyCINCincinnati fan
Oct 17L 42-45 at West VirginiaAnother embarrassment brought to you by Scott Satterfield, the coach nobody asked for.CINCincinnati fan
Earlier weeks
Oct 3L 7-34 at ArizonaGoodnight amigos. Fire satterfieldCINCincinnati fan
Sep 26W 31-26 vs. Kansas StateThis is a 3 win team, thank god Satterfield will be goneCINCincinnati fan
Sep 19W 35-31 vs. Miami (OH)Satterfield should be fired at halftimeCINCincinnati fan
Sep 12W 62-10 vs. Western CarolinaThe program during mark Dantino era is what is considered the beginning of it being legit, and you won’t hear me disagree with Satterfield being not itCINCincinnati fan
Sep 5W 34-15 vs. Boston CollegeAww, the commentators are trying to sell that Scott Satterfield does a good job and is handcuffed by bad fan support. That’s adorable.CINCincinnati fan
Several stories about him this week
Sat Nov 7: Houston
64th of 104 FBS head coaches · from a few outlets and r/CFB
Gold: stories about him each day. W and L: his games.
Gold: stories we tracked each season, drawn on a square-root scale so a quiet year still shows. Hatched: before we started tracking (2019). Earlier years had thinner coverage, so compare within a stop, not across decades.
Stories are headlines grouped by what they are about, counted through Nov 4.
Stats
Big games
Pick a job to see its years on their own.
The big-game ledger
How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.
6-2 against his rivals at App State. Nobody he faced three or more times there has a winning record against him.
Every AP-ranked regular-season opponent, by rank (#1 at top) and year
’15’16’17’18
win loss · higher = higher-ranked opponent · dashed line = top 10
Signature wins
WGA
Georgia Southern · 2016
34-10
RivalQuality opponent
WGA
Georgia Southern · 2015
31-13
RivalQuality opponent
WTO
Toledo · 2017
34-0
UpsetQuality opponentBowl/CFP stakes
Signature losses
LGA
Georgia Southern · 2014
14-34
Rival
LGA
Georgia Southern · 2018
14-34
RivalUpset
LMI
Miami · 2016
10-45
Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.
The big-game ledger
How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.
0-3 against his rivals at Louisville. Winless in 3 tries against Dabo Swinney.
0% win rate across a real, 3-meeting series — short of the bar this site uses before badging a series “Nemesis.” Shown here as the toughest matchup on record, not an algorithmic crown.
Performance by opponent class
Blue Blood
0-4 0.0%ATS —
Power Program
4-7 36.4%ATS 6-5 11 of 11
National Program
9-10 47.4%ATS 9-10 19 of 19
Regional Program
10-3 76.9%ATS 10-3 13 of 13
Signature games
2-7 vs. AP top 25 · 1-3 vs. the top 10
Every AP-ranked regular-season opponent, by rank (#1 at top) and year
’19’20’21’22
win loss · higher = higher-ranked opponent · dashed line = top 10
Signature wins
WFS
Florida State · 2020
48-16
Quality opponent
WMS
Mississippi State · 2019
38-28
UpsetQuality opponentBowl/CFP stakes
WPI
Pittsburgh · 2022
24-10
Quality opponent
Signature losses
LKY
Kentucky · 2019
13-45
Rival
LKY
Kentucky · 2022
13-26
Rival
LKY
Kentucky · 2021
21-52
RivalUpset
Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.
The big-game ledger
How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.
2-1 against his rivals at Cincinnati. Just 1-2 against Matt Campbell.
’23 L · blew a 4-pt lead’24 L · blew a 7-pt lead’25 W · wire to wire
covered the spread
33% win rate across a real, 3-meeting series — short of the bar this site uses before badging a series “Nemesis.” Shown here as the toughest matchup on record, not an algorithmic crown.
Performance by opponent class
Power Program
3-8 27.3%ATS 3-8 11 of 11
National Program
8-14 36.4%ATS 10-12 22 of 22
Regional Program
5-3 62.5%ATS 3-5 8 of 8
Signature games
2-4 vs. AP top 25 · 1-1 vs. the top 10
Every AP-ranked regular-season opponent, by rank (#1 at top) and year
’23’25’26
win loss · higher = higher-ranked opponent · dashed line = top 10
Signature wins
WM-
Miami (OH) · 2024
27-16
RivalQuality opponent
WM-
Miami (OH) · 2026
35-31
RivalQuality opponent
WTT
Texas Tech · 2026
37-24
UpsetQuality opponent
Signature losses
LNA
Navy · 2025
13-35
Bowl/CFP stakes
LM-
Miami (OH) · 2023
24-31
RivalUpset
LKU
Kansas · 2023
16-49
Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.
The big-game ledger
How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.
8-6 against his rivals. Winless in 4 tries against Dabo Swinney.
0% win rate across a real, 4-meeting series — short of the bar this site uses before badging a series “Nemesis.” Shown here as the toughest matchup on record, not an algorithmic crown.
Performance by opponent class
Blue Blood
0-4 0.0%ATS —
Power Program
7-21 25.0%ATS 11-17 28 of 28
National Program
21-24 46.7%ATS 23-22 45 of 45
Regional Program
54-15 78.3%ATS 37-29-3 69 of 69
Signature games
4-16 vs. AP top 25 · 2-6 vs. the top 10
Every AP-ranked regular-season opponent, by rank (#1 at top) and year
’15’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25’26
win loss · higher = higher-ranked opponent · dashed line = top 10
Signature wins
WGA
Georgia Southern · 2016
34-10
RivalQuality opponent
WGA
Georgia Southern · 2015
31-13
RivalQuality opponent
WTO
Toledo · 2017
34-0
UpsetQuality opponentBowl/CFP stakes
Signature losses
LKY
Kentucky · 2019
13-45
Rival
LNA
Navy · 2025
13-35
Bowl/CFP stakes
LGA
Georgia Southern · 2014
14-34
Rival
Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.
ATS is his record against the spread: did his team beat the closing betting line, winning by more than it or losing by less? Lines start in 2013; a dash means fewer than 6 of those games had one. One-score games carry no spread record: a big favorite that wins a close game has almost always failed to cover, so that number would say nothing about the coach.
2,419 run and pass snaps at Cincinnati, 2023–2025, his own games, one row per offensive coordinator. Each cell is how much more often he passed than the rest of FBS did in the same situation (field zone, down, distance, score, quarter, same season), in percentage points.
passed moreran morewithin noise (95% range includes 0)
Pass rate, stint by stint
Where each stint’s offense sat between run-first and pass-first, and how far it moved from one season to the next, against the FBS-wide average of 41% pass. The band is that stint’s real season-to-season range, not a fixed-width box.
Pass rate — share of offensive plays that were pass attemptsfirst covered seasonmost recent covered seasonfull season-to-season range (3+ covered seasons)
How much that is, against every other stint
Season-to-season pass-rate range for all 449 FBS coaching stints with at least three covered seasons, 2004–2025.
Typical stint7.010.3 median14.8middle half of all stints
App State7.3pt#326 of 449 · a typical amount
Louisville8.1pt#297 of 449 · a typical amount
Cincinnati7.2pt#329 of 449 · a typical amount
Building the roster
Six numbers on how he actually stocks a roster, from signing day to draft day.
His 4 ranked Cincinnati classes of his own have averaged #61 nationally — best #51, worst #75.
APApp State
2018
#113
His class
LOLouisville
2019
#69
His class
2020
#42
His class
2021
#38
His class
2022
#51
His class
CICincinnati
2023
#75
His class
2024
#51
His class
2025
#61
His class
2026
#58
His class
Across every program: 9 ranked classes of his own, averaging #62 nationally.
His class — he had the full signing cycle
Rank is each signing class’s national recruiting rank (#1 is best). Only a class he had a full signing cycle to build counts as his.
Followed him here
at least2players
LOLouisville→CICincinnati2023
At least 2 players followed him from Louisville to Cincinnati.
Dee Wiggins WR
Luke Kandra OL
APApp State→LOLouisville2019
No confirmed followers on this move. This move predates this database’s 2021 transfer-portal tracking floor, so real followers may be undercounted here.
Players who transferred from his old program to his new one through the portal in the same year he made the move. Name-matching across data sources misses some, so every count is a floor, not an exact number.
Roster ownership
Roster ownership
97%His own players
of his 2026 roster arrived on his watch — 109 of 112 players. The other 3 are holdovers from before he was hired.
Arrived under him 109Inherited 3
Of his own players on this roster, 23% came through the transfer portal; the rest are non-portal arrivals (high-school signees, JUCO transfers, walk-ons).
New players each season, 2023–2026
33% of his 207 new players since 2023 came through the portal (FBS programs, same seasons: 26%). His share was 35% in 2023 and 28% in 2026.
Graded on the players who arrived and the players who left together, his portal seasons came out better than most FBS programs’ in 1 of the 4 seasons graded. our read
202316 of 46Portal grade: about typical for FBS that season
202421 of 63Portal grade: better than most — #9 of 134 FBS programs that season
202517 of 45Portal grade: about typical for FBS that season
202615 of 53Portal grade: about typical for FBS that season
Came through the portalNon-portal arrivalsFBS-wide share that season
Each player counts once, in the season he arrived. 2021, the first season of portal tracking here, is left off because its arrival records look incomplete (about 31 new players per FBS team, against 52 in 2022). Portal grade: the site’s position-value-weighted scoring (the same engine as the Portal Heat feed and the “Who won the portal” grade): the value of the players who came in minus the value of the ones who left, ranked against every FBS program’s grade that same season. A season with fewer than 4 transfers in and out is not graded.
“His own” means the player arrived while he was head coach; “inherited” means a predecessor brought him in.
Size up front
Size up front
+6 lbAgainst the FBS average
Offensive linemen on his Cincinnati rosters have averaged 6 lb heavier than the FBS average (2023–2026) — heavier than 80% of FBS coaching runs since 2010. In the three seasons before he arrived, Cincinnati’s line averaged 5 lb heavier than the FBS average.
App State2014–2018−13 lb
Louisville2019–2022−3 lb
Cincinnati2023–2026+6 lb
−20−10FBS avg+10lb
His seasonsSame program, the seasons before he arrivedMiddle half of FBS coaching runs since 2010
Average listed weight of every offensive lineman on each season’s roster, holdovers included, against every FBS roster that season (2010 on; a program needs 3+ seasons under him to appear). Weights are the ones programs publish, and programs list differently. This describes size only — not scheme, and not quality.
Where he recruits
OHTop state
is his biggest recruiting state: 27 of 83 signees (33%) across his 2023–2026 tenure, drawn from 18 states in all. Next: GA (18).
Where his signees came from, 2023–2026 (83 high-school, JUCO and prep signees)
43% of his signees come from OH and its 5 border states (IN 3, MI 3, PA 3).
Off this map: 3 signees to the west (CA, IA, others), 3 to the east (PA 3) and 1 to the south (FL).
By region
Midwest
40
South
39
Northeast
3
West
1
Roster distance from campus (Nippert Stadium, OH)
median hometown distance
297 mi
within 100 mi
22%
within 500 mi
78%
beyond 1,000 mi
6%
107 of 112 roster players with a known hometown (96% coverage)
The map counts signed recruits across his tenure; the distance figures cover his current roster, transfers and walk-ons included. Two different groups, kept separate on purpose.
The NFL pipeline
The NFL pipeline
6Drafted
players drafted into the NFL off his teams here. He brought in 3 of them himself; 3 arrived under Luke Fickell.
His recruits 3Inherited 36 roster-verified · 0 estimated
Most recent picks first
Year
Pick
Player
Pos
NFL team
Note
2026
R2.19
Jake Golday
Linebacker
Minnesota Vikings
2026
R5.30
Joe Royer
Tight End
Cleveland Browns
2026
R5.36
Cyrus Allen
Wide Receiver
Kansas City Chiefs
2026
R7.19
Gavin Gerhardt
Center
Minnesota Vikings
recruited under Luke Fickell
2025
R7.34
John Williams
Offensive Tackle
Green Bay Packers
recruited under Luke Fickell
2024
R7.23
Jowon Briggs
Defensive Tackle
Cleveland Browns
recruited under Luke Fickell
A pick counts toward his tenure when the player’s final college season was one he coached, a checkable rule rather than a claim about who developed the player. A blank note means the player is on a verified roster and arrived on his watch. “Estimated” means no roster record, so the final season is assumed to be the year before the draft.
News
Stories about him
Headlines, grouped by what they are about. Each is the outlet’s own.
We had already heard that schools had reached out — Texas Tech in particular had already reached out — with four games left
Great guy, great teammate, works hard. Gave it his all. Just obviously an unfortunate thing that happened with him, and hopefully he will learn from it and grow from it.
Yeah, there certainly have been scouts, GM’s, that have reached out, and just asking questions, more on a personal level than a football level, with their interest, knowing something like this could happen. I certainly think that now that the news is out, over the next few weeks, there’s going to be a lot more inquiries about him.
Great guy, great teammate, works hard. Gave it his all. Just obviously an unfortunate thing that happened with him, and hopefully he will learn from it and grow from it.
Scott Satterfield slid Cincinnati from Power Program III to National Program I in 4 seasons.
−12.0 pts over 4 seasons · bottom 7% of 3-5-season tenures (717 in sample)
4th-best Cincinnati tenure of 19 by the numbers.
Followed Luke Fickell (2017–2022).
System Shift, on arrival
swipe to see every season
Season
2023
2024
2025
2026
Trend
Record & result
Record
3-9
5-7
7-6
5-3
Postseason
—
—
L bowl
—
Coordinators
OC
Brad Glenn
Brad Glenn
Brad Glenn
Pete Thomas / Nic Cardwell
DC
Bryan Brown / Nate Fuqua
Tyson Veidt / Nate Fuqua
Tyson Veidt / Cortney Braswell
Nate Woody / Cortney Braswell
Outcome — opponent-adjusted efficiency percentile
Offense
52
40
81
74
Defense
0
56
22
18
Tendencies — play-by-play, neutral script
1st-down pass%
42.6
45.7
42.8
39.2
Red-zone pass%
37.8
54.0
44.7
33.3
4th-down go%opp. territory
47.8
34.3
40.7
30.0
Recruiter or developer?
Performs about as expected for his recruiting talent on offense and underperforms his recruiting talent on defense.
Offense vs. talent
+6.5 pts
#76 of 208 · middle half
Defense vs. talent
-25.4 pts
#191 of 208 · bottom quarter
Recruiting talent is team-wide (no offense/defense split exists in the source data) -- both sides are scored against the same talent input, only the outcome is side-specific.
Who they bring in
Typical size for position, once adjusted for position mix.
A typical class-year mix of incoming transfers.
Avg. size (raw)
6′1″, 230 lbs
across 69 of 88 arrivals — unadjusted for position mix
Size vs. position-typical
+4.9 lbs
#102 of 255 · middle half
Avg. class year
Jr
#66 of 255 · middle half
Avg. portal rating
3.0★
rated arrivals only
Top states: OH (10), GA (8), TX (7), FL (7), LA (5)
On3’s modeled estimate (social reach / exposure), not money actually paid — shown per player, never totaled.
Who won the portal our read
Talent added
57.9
position-weighted
Talent lost
61.8
position-weighted
Net
-3.9
arrivals minus departures
Best addition: Brendan Sorsby (QB) from Indiana
Biggest loss: Brendan Sorsby (QB) to Texas Tech
Position-value-weighted (QB/CB weighted highest, depth-decayed within each position) — the same scoring engine as the Portal Heat feed, not a separate grade.
Does the system survive a coordinator change?
OC: Brad Glenn → Pete Thomas (co) / Nic Cardwell (co) · 2026
1-season window either side — numbers shown, not enough to badge a verdict.
1st-down pass rate: 42.8% → 39.2% (-3.6 pts)
Confound, shown not hidden: only 8% of offensive production returned the year the coordinator changed — the roster turned over at the same time, not just the play-caller.
Scott Satterfield moved Louisville from Power Program III to National Program I in 4 seasons.
−1.4 pts over 4 seasons · top 40% of 3-5-season tenures (717 in sample)
5th-best Louisville tenure of 15 by the numbers.
Followed Bobby Petrino (2014–2018) · succeeded by Jeff Brohm (2023–now).
System Shift, on arrival
System Shift, on departure
swipe to see every season
Season
2019
2020
2021
2022
Trend
Record & result
Record
8-5
4-7
6-7
7-5
Postseason
W bowl
—
L bowl
—
Coordinators
OC
Dwayne Ledford
Dwayne Ledford
—
Lance Taylor
DC
Bryan Brown
Bryan Brown
Bryan Brown / Cort Dennison
Bryan Brown / Wesley McGriff
Outcome — opponent-adjusted efficiency percentile
Offense
90
78
91
53
Defense
4
62
21
97
Tendencies — play-by-play, neutral script
1st-down pass%
31.8
39.9
36.0
38.3
Red-zone pass%
34.1
41.9
24.7
29.4
4th-down go%opp. territory
32.4
46.7
41.5
38.1
Recruiter or developer?
Outperforms his recruiting talent on offense and performs about as expected for his recruiting talent on defense.
Offense vs. talent
+24.8 pts
#21 of 208 · top quarter
Defense vs. talent
-6.9 pts
#136 of 208 · middle half
Recruiting talent is team-wide (no offense/defense split exists in the source data) -- both sides are scored against the same talent input, only the outcome is side-specific.
Roster construction · portal era
A typical amount of portal roster-building.
Portal arrivals
19
3.1★ avg rating
Portal departures
34
left via the portal
Net portal flow
-15
#131 of 187 FBS stints
Who they bring in
Typical size for position, once adjusted for position mix.
Recruits older, more experienced transfers than most.
Avg. size (raw)
6′1″, 221 lbs
across 16 of 19 arrivals — unadjusted for position mix
Size vs. position-typical
+2.5 lbs
#182 of 255 · middle half
Avg. class year
Sr
#1 of 255 · top quarter
Top states: SC (3), GA (2), FL (2), TX (2), MS (1)
Who won the portal our read
Talent added
43.0
position-weighted
Talent lost
54.2
position-weighted
Net
-11.1
arrivals minus departures
Best addition: Quincy Riley (CB) from Middle Tennessee
Biggest loss: Jawon Pass (QB) to the portal
Position-value-weighted (QB/CB weighted highest, depth-decayed within each position) — the same scoring engine as the Portal Heat feed, not a separate grade.
Does the system survive a coordinator change?
DC: Bryan Brown → Bryan Brown / Cort Dennison (co) · 2021
1-season window either side — numbers shown, not enough to badge a verdict.
Where the roster comes from, by position
Buys Athlete via the portal
20%
#24 of 146 stints
Grows Tight end from high school
100%
#164 of 188 stints
Grows Linebacker from high school
80%
#170 of 225 stints
Postseason detail2019: Beat Mississippi State 38-28 Franklin American Mortgage Music City Bowl2021: Lost to Air Force 28-31 SERVPRO First Responder Bowl
Scott Satterfield held App State at National Program II for 5 seasons.
3rd-best App State tenure of 7 by the numbers.
Followed Mike Working (1980–1981) · succeeded by Eli Drinkwitz (2019).
System Shift, on departure
swipe to see every season
Season
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Trend
Record & result
Record
7-5
11-2
10-3
9-4
10-2
Postseason
—
W bowl
W bowl
W bowl
—
Coordinators
OC
Frank Ponce / Dwayne Ledford
Frank Ponce / Dwayne Ledford
Frank Ponce / Shawn Clark
Frank Ponce / Shawn Clark
Frank Ponce / Shawn Clark
DC
Nate Woody
Nate Woody
Nate Woody
Nate Woody
Bryan Brown
Outcome — opponent-adjusted efficiency percentile
Offense
87
78
62
88
86
Defense
76
97
89
81
98
Tendencies — play-by-play, neutral script
1st-down pass%
29.9
26.5
32.2
39.8
29.2
Red-zone pass%
31.9
28.0
36.6
34.2
32.3
4th-down go%opp. territory
42.4
35.7
44.7
36.6
46.4
Recruiter or developer?
Outperforms his recruiting talent, on both sides of the ball.
Offense vs. talent
+42.2 pts
#4 of 208 · top quarter
Defense vs. talent
+53.5 pts
#1 of 208 · top quarter
Recruiting talent is team-wide (no offense/defense split exists in the source data) -- both sides are scored against the same talent input, only the outcome is side-specific.
Does the system survive a coordinator change?
OC: Frank Ponce (co) / Dwayne Ledford (co) → Frank Ponce (co) / Shawn Clark (co) · 2016The system held
2-season window either side.
1st-down pass rate: 28.2% → 36.0% (+7.8 pts)
Confound, shown not hidden: only 72% of offensive production returned the year the coordinator changed — the roster turned over at the same time, not just the play-caller.
Where the roster comes from, by position
Grows Tight end from high school
100%
#164 of 188 stints
Grows Edge from high school
100%
#191 of 208 stints
Postseason detail2015: Beat Ohio 31-29 Raycom Media Camellia Bowl2016: Beat Toledo 31-28 Raycom Media Camellia Bowl2017: Beat Toledo 34-0 Dollar General Bowl
2 NFL Draft picks: Ronald Blair (2016), Colby Gossett (2018)