CFB Zeitgeist Score
59
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by yards / att at the 93rd percentile.
Joey Labas
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
1,854 PASS YDS · 13 PASS TD · -17 RUSH YDS
2026 Outlook
Returning to Central Michigan for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Returning starter
Quarterback · Central Michigan
Returning around him
2026 Award watch
No preseason watch lists yet (most drop June 15 – July 15)
Central Michigan · Last season: 7-6 · Talent rank #121 · 2026 recruiting class #113
QB · CENTRAL MICHIGAN · MID-AMERICAN
CFB Zeitgeist Score
59
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by yards / att at the 93rd percentile.
Heisman Heat
#1618
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP QB AWARD
Davey O'Brien
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Development Trajectory · passing yards
2022–2025Up 1234% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No recruiting profile is on file for this player. | ||
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
50
Mixed Sentiment
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
Signature Story
He hasn't written his page yet — we'll start filling it in when there are enough snaps to rank against his peers.
Signature Moment
No signature moment on the ledger yet.
Returns once this player puts together a multi-game body of work — single-game flashes alone don't clear the bar.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the passing totals stand
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Joey Labas's story is about how role and output meet each other. For Central Michigan, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Steady volume | Efficient | Vertical threat against FBS QB peers. The quickest read is whether the profile wins on volume, efficiency, explosiveness, or rushing value.
2025 season snapshot | final
Passing Efficiency
Passing Production
Rushing
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 13 games
| Wk | Opp | CMP/ATT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA | QBR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 16-14@ San José State | 5/10 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 5.6 | 20.2 | |
| Wk 2 | L 17-45@ Pittsburgh | 11/14 | 89 | 1 | 0 | 6.4 | 57.4 | |
| Wk 3 | L 3-63@ Michigan | 4/8 | 36 | 0 | 1 | 4.5 | 1.6 | |
| Wk 4 | W 49-10vs Wagner | 12/14 | 241 | 3 | 0 | 17.2 | 99.5 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 5 | W 24-13vs Eastern Michigan | 14/16 | 138 | 1 | 0 | 8.6 | 76.2 | |
| Wk 6 | L 22-28@ Akron | 12/21 | 134 | 0 | 0 | 6.4 | 20.0 | |
| Wk 8 | W 27-6@ Bowling Green | 2/4 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 77.0 | |
| Wk 9 | W 38-13vs Massachusetts | 10/11 | 148 | 2 | 0 | 13.5 | 72.7 | |
| Wk 10 | L 21-24@ Western Michigan | 8/11 | 152 | 1 | 1 | 13.8 | 46.3 | |
| Wk 12 | W 38-19vs Buffalo | 18/24 | 247 | 2 | 2 | 10.3 | 37.9 | Season-high 247 yds |
| Wk 13 | W 28-16@ Kent State | 11/20 | 121 | 2 | 1 | 6.1 | 40.5 | |
| Wk 14 | L 3-21vs Toledo | 19/30 | 242 | 0 | 1 | 8.1 | 36.3 | |
| Bowl | L 7-34@ Northwestern | 21/25 | 178 | 1 | 0 | 7.1 | 37.9 | |
| Total | 147/208 | 1854 | 13 | 6 | 9.7 | 48.0 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
| Season | Team | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Central Michigan | 147 | 208 | 70.7% | 1,854 | 8.9 | 13 | 6 | 160.4 | -- | -- |
| 2022 | Iowa | 14 | 24 | 58.3% | 139 | 5.8 | 1 | 0 | 120.7 | -- | -- |
| Career | 2 loaded seasons | 161 | 232 | 69.4% | 1,993 | 8.6 | 14 | 6 | 156.3 | -- | -- |
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Central Michigan | 54 | -17 | -0.3 | 0 | -- |
| 2022 | Iowa | 4 | 11 | 2.8 | 0 | -- |
| Career | 2 loaded seasons | 58 | -6 | -0.1 | 0 | -- |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
Opponent-adjusted passing value. Positive numbers mean the quarterback is adding more value through the air than a neutral peer would in the same environment.
How much of the offense runs through the quarterback once passing and rushing responsibility are blended together.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | Passing yards | 1,854 | #98/382 | 75th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Pass TD | 13 | #80/407 | 81st pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completions | 147 | #105/383 | 73rd pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completion % | 70.7% | #63/383 | 84th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Yards / attempt | 8.9 | #53/382 | 86th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | -17 | #377/408 | 8th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Value | Passing WEPA | +0.32 | #62/200 | 70th pct | Opponent-adjusted passing value | 207 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Role share | 32.3% | #172/428 | 60th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Attempts | 208 | #120/407 | 71st pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Interceptions | 6 | #294/407 | 28th pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Carries | 54 | #114/408 | 72nd pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 10 | #298/391 | 24th pct | Metricvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 0 | #230/408 | 44th pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | -0.3 | #344/407 | 16th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Pass share | 80.2% | #115/428 | 73rd pct | Air-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 45.6% | #166/428 | 61st pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 43.5% | #171/428 | 60th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 31.7% | #175/428 | 59th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 28.2% | #168/428 | 61st pct | Early-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 25.9% | #180/428 | 58th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Rush share | 6.4% | #238/428 | 45th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Value | Rushing WEPA | +0.12 | #123/140 | 13th pct | Opponent-adjusted rushing value | 34 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 4 | #237/258 | 9th pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 13 games
Home vs Road
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home5g | 203 | 1.6 | 11.5 | 0.6 |
| Road8g | 105 | 0.6 | 8.5 | 0.4 |
Win vs Loss
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins7g | 146 | 1.4 | 11.3 | 0.4 |
| Losses6g | 138 | 0.5 | 7.7 | 0.5 |
First half vs Second half
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-77g | 125 | 0.9 | 8.0 | 0.1 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 164 | 1.2 | 11.6 | 0.8 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the QB cohort
Elite: completion % (96th). Strength: yards / att (93rd). Concern: fumbles lost (8th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · QB · 2024
Reads as a mid-tier profile across the board..
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Balanced passer who operates within the system. Profile sits near league average across dimensions.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Grayson McCall’s 2023 season.
Grayson McCall
Tyler Shough
Jacob Clark
Tanner Morgan
Dylan Raiola
Matches Grayson on
Differs from Grayson on
Through 3 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Eli Peters’s path through Toledo.
Eli Peters
Tyler Van Dyke
Kenny Pickett
Ian Book
Haynes King
Matches Eli on
As a junior, his production profile tracks closest to Jacob Clark's junior season at Missouri State (2025).
Jacob Clark
Tanner Morgan
Hudson Card
Joey Aguilar
Will Levis
Matches Jacob on
Differs from Jacob on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Matt Drinkall
Pass share
32.2%
252 pass / 531 run
Plays / game
60.2
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
10.1%
188 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-heavy, slow tempo.
Coaching Lineage · 2022–2025
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Jim McElwain → Matt Drinkall. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Central Michigan | QB4 | #1618 | #1827 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | Mid-American |
| 2023 | Iowa | QB4 | #954 | #727 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W19 snapshot | Big Ten |
| 2022 | Iowa | QB4 | #520 | #446 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | Big Ten |
| 2021 | Iowa | QB4 | #557 | #309 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | Big Ten |
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Central Michigan | Mid-American | QB | 4 | No. 2 | 6-4 | 210 lb | Brecksville, OH |
| 2024 | Central Michigan | Mid-American | QB | 4 | No. 2 | 6-4 | 210 lb | Brecksville, OH |
| 2023 | Iowa | Big Ten | QB | 4 | No. 2 | 6-4 | 210 lb | Brecksville, OH |
| 2022 | Iowa | Big Ten | QB | 4 | No. 2 | 6-4 | 210 lb | Brecksville, OH |
| 2021 | Iowa | Big Ten | QB | 4 | No. 2 | 6-4 | 210 lb | Brecksville, OH |