CFB Zeitgeist Score
86
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by sacks at the 96th percentile.
Keionte Scott
Keionte Scott is Miami's steady hand — loved less for the stat line than for staying.
Miami fans claim him as family first and a player second.
AI narrative · updated 2026-06-22 · compiled from CFB Zeitgeist data
Where He Ended Up · NFL
Tampa Bay2026 NFL rookie season
DB · MIAMI · ACC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
86
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by sacks at the 96th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#11108
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP DB AWARD
Jim Thorpe
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterPart-time starter. Splitting first-team reps.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No recruiting profile is on file for this player. | ||
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
NFL Draft
2026 · Rd 4, Pick 16
#116 overall · Tampa Bay
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment · Season 2025 conversation window
Belief Meter
65
Quietly Bullish
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
Only 2 rival mention(s) — below the 4-mention floor for a defensible read.
Signature Story
He hasn't written his page yet — we'll start filling it in when there are enough snaps to rank against his peers.
Signature Moment
No signature moment on the ledger yet.
Returns once this player puts together a multi-game body of work — single-game flashes alone don't clear the bar.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the defensive totals stand
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Keionte Scott is trying to climb the steepest award hill in college football: a defensive candidacy. The hook is the disruption profile on Miami's defense, with 5.0 sacks, 13.0 tackles for loss, and 2 interceptions through the current loaded season. For a defender, the question is never just production; it is whether elite disruption and team context can become nationally undeniable.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
High-disruption defender | Coverage splash | High-volume tackler against FBS defenders.
2025 season snapshot | final
Tackling & Disruption
Coverage & Takeaways
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 14 games
| Wk | Opp | TKL | SOLO | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 27-24vs Notre Dame | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 2 | 2 sacks |
| Wk 2 | W 45-3vs Bethune-Cookman | 3 | 3 | 3.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | 3.0 TFL |
| Wk 3 | W 49-12vs South Florida | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 4 | W 26-7vs Florida | 3 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 6 | W 28-22@ Florida State | 11 | 5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | — | 1 | Season-high 11 tackles |
| Wk 8 | L 21-24vs Louisville | 9 | 8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | 3.0 TFL |
| Wk 9 | W 42-7vs Stanford | 5 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 10 | L 20-26@ SMU | 8 | 6 | 2.0 | 1.0 | — | 1 | |
| Wk 11 | W 38-10vs Syracuse | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Wk 12 | W 41-7vs NC State | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Bowl | W 10-3@ Texas A&M | 10 | 5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | — | 0 | |
| Bowl | W 24-14@ Ohio State | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Bowl | W 31-27@ Ole Miss | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Bowl | L 21-27@ Indiana | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Total | 64 | 42 | 13.0 | 5.0 | 2 | 5 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
TFL, sacks, and QB hurries are grouped together because defensive Heisman cases are usually built on visible havoc, not on tackle counts alone.
Pass breakups, interceptions, and forced fumbles matter because national awards voters respond to plays that change possessions and highlight reels.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defense | Total tackles | 64 | #340/4942 | 93rd pct | Volumevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | TFL | 13.0 | #42/4972 | 99th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Sacks | 5.0 | #102/4972 | 98th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Interceptions | 2 | #114/869 | 87th pct | Takeawaysvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Pass breakups | 5 | #218/2184 | 90th pct | Coveragevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | QB hurries | 8 | #41/1878 | 98th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | INT return yards | 110 | #11/578 | 98th pct | Takeawaysvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | INT return avg | 55.0 | #23/578 | 96th pct | Takeawaysvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Solo tackles | 42 | #165/4584 | 96th pct | Volumevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Defensive TD | 2 | #4/200 | 98th pct | Scoringvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Fumbles recovered | 2 | #13/736 | 98th pct | Takeawaysvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Pick-six TD | 2 | #1/119 | 100th pct | Scoringvs FBS DEF |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 0 | #1/773 | 100th pct | Turnoversvs FBS DEF |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
The Thorpe award tracker integrates per-week probability once a dedicated scraper for this award lands. Confirmed past winners and finalists for this player will surface here.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 14 games
Home vs Road
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home8g | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Road6g | 6.5 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
Win vs Loss
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins11g | 4.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Losses3g | 6.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 |
First half vs Second half
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-79g | 4.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Weeks 8+5g | 4.8 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the DB cohort
Elite: tackles for loss (98th). Strength: qb hurries (98th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · DB · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Lives near the line of scrimmage as a de facto extra linebacker.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Coen King’s 2023 season.
Coen King
Joseph Charleston
Akili Arnold
Elliott Davison
Nicolas Sessions
Matches Coen on
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
As a senior, his production profile tracks closest to Coen King's senior season at Virginia (2023).
Coen King
Joseph Charleston
Akili Arnold
Dave Herard
Kenneth Robinson
Matches Coen on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Mario Cristobal
Pass share
47.2%
496 pass / 554 run
Plays / game
65.6
16 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
4.1%
245 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2022–2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Mario Cristobal.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.