Will Hagerup: P · Michigan · #40.
Closest statistical matches, adjusted for opponent strength.
Michigan’s specialists
Will Hagerup
Handles the punting job without giving the return man a lane.
Play style
Handles the punting job without giving the return man a lane.
Punter archetype · season enumeration
Leg vs placement
42.9 gross, but 16 of 53 inside the 20 (30.2%) — in between — no clean archetype. no clean archetype
Net average is unavailable — no per-punt return-yardage linkage exists in the source data.
No outlet on our list has written about this player by name this season.
Game log · Week-by-week
2014 season · 12 games
Swipe the table sideways for more columns.
| Wk | Opp | PUNT | YDS | AVG | LONG | IN20 | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 52-14vs App State | 1 | 46 | 46.0 | 46 | 1 | |
| Wk 2 | L 0-31@ No. 16 Notre Dame | 4 | 170 | 42.5 | 48 | 1 | |
| Wk 3 | W 34-10vs Miami (OH) | 3 | 128 | 42.7 | 44 | 1 | |
| Wk 4 | L 10-26vs Utah | 5 | 194 | 38.8 | 46 | 2 | |
| Wk 5 | L 14-30vs Minnesota | 8 | 400 | 50.0 | 63 | 1 | |
| Wk 6 | L 24-26@ Rutgers | 4 | 190 | 47.5 | 61 | 1 | |
| Wk 7 | W 18-13vs Penn State | 5 | 219 | 43.8 | 52 | 2 | |
| Wk 9 | L 11-35@ No. 8 Michigan State | 6 | 254 | 42.3 | 55 | 2 | |
| Wk 10 | W 34-10vs Indiana | 4 | 155 | 38.8 | 44 | 0 | |
| Wk 11 | W 10-9@ Northwestern | 7 | 267 | 38.1 | 57 | 3 | |
| Wk 13 | L 16-23vs Maryland | 2 | 86 | 43.0 | 49 | 1 | |
| Wk 14 | L 28-42@ No. 7 Ohio State | 4 | 165 | 41.3 | 49 | 1 | |
| Total | 53 | 2274 | 42.9 | 63 | 16 |
Season context: team record and system
Punter profile · Distance and placement
Where his punts land, not just how far
Inside the 20
30%16 of 53Touchback rate
17%9 of 53Yards / punt
42.953 puntsLong
63yards42.9 yards/punt on 53 punts · 30% placed inside the 20 · 9 touchbacks.
How it ended
One season at Michigan — the college career is complete.
Coaching lineage · 2010–2014
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Rich Rodriguez → Brady Hoke. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
