vs. Louisville, Sat Nov 7, 7:30 pm ET · LOULouisville is 5-3 · Key vs. Jeff Brohm: 0-2 · Georgia Tech’s chance to win: 8% (the site’s model)
If Georgia Tech wins: 28%, 9th of 132
Now: 38%
If Georgia Tech loses: 37%, 7th of 132
His chance of being out after the season, now and after Saturday. Each tick is an FBS head coach’s number today; ranks are against today’s field. From the site’s hot-seat model.
Is he getting fired?
38%chance he’s out after the season · 7th of 132 FBS head coaches · Boiling
Dark line: his number after each game; a small dot just before a game is where it stood at kickoff, after other results moved it. Gray: where it could go, 8 seasons in 10 (darker, the middle half). The hollow dot: had his last game gone the other way. From the site’s hot-seat model.
If he finishes…
Bar: how likely that finish isNumber: his chance of being out
2-1036%
3-927%
4-820%
Why his number is where it is
Our hot-seat model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, and his contract (a bigger buyout, relative to pay, makes a change costlier). Ranked against the 132 FBS head coaches with 3+ games this season.
All three of his finished seasons here ended Cool. Now hotter than at this point in any of them.
His hot seat, week by week
The chance he’s out by the end of that season, as it stood after every week of his tenure here, by today’s model.
← swipe for earlier seasons
Earlier seasons price the games left with power ratings rebuilt after those seasons ended · he took over during the 2022 season (8 games); that year is unrated, since each season counts against whoever started it.
What drives his number
The biggest factors, each against the typical FBS job today.
▲ Hotter
2-6, outscored by 48
▲ Hotter
$11.1M buyout · 2.5× his pay, a multiple below average in FBS — cheap to move on
▲ Hotter
Year 4· tenure, which this model overrates(why?)
Tenure is one of this model’s strongest inputs, but its weight was set when retirements like Nick Saban’s and Bob Stoops’ still counted as being pushed out, so it overstates how much tenure matters.
What happened to coaches like him, 2004–2025
A different comparison: past coaches, not today’s, grouped by one fact at a time. Neither line knows the games he has left or his contract, so they can sit above or below his chance.
Were 2-6 after 8 games
16% pushed out over results · of 288 coaches
Were in years 3-4, after 8 games
13% pushed out over results · of 754 coaches
The outcome
Pushed out over results — a firing, forced resignation, mutual parting or non-renewal, each read case by case. Leaving for a better job, or retiring on his own terms, doesn’t count.
Buyout
$11,123,333reported, USA Today, Oct. 2025· 2.5× total pay· a small buyout, which raises his chance of being let go· without it: 29%
How good is this number? Checked on every FBS coach from 2010 to 2025, with its percentages calibrated each season on earlier years only: they track what happened — coaches it put near 25% were out about a quarter of the time — and a version pricing the games left with the previous season’s ratings ranked jobs as well as the ranking this page used before. Each week it learns from coaches who were still on the job at that point, so a firing during the season counts. In the Boiling zone it has run a few points high. Every job, and the method.
12:30 kick @Clemson on the CW Outside of ACC after dark I think the is the lowest ranking time slot.
Norvell Gone https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/50055526/fsu-norvell-candidates-roster Bet that wasn't cheap.
Pretty sure Narduzzi just used this game as an open practice for Geriner because it was so painfully clear our offense posed no threat
Fan mood · last 3 weeks · more negative than 3 in 4 FBS fan bases
Offense: 58th of 138 per play. Defense: 131st.
Through 8 games. Each tick is an FBS team, adjusted for opponent strength (CFB Zeitgeist model); the dot is Georgia Tech. The other two rows are where Georgia Tech stands furthest from the middle. Early-season numbers move a lot.
4 games left
Sat Nov 7vs. LOULouisville (5-3)8%
Sat Nov 14at CLEMClemson (5-3)11%
Sat Nov 21vs. WAKEWake Forest (7-1)4%
Sat Nov 28at UGAGeorgia (7-1)2%
Percent: Georgia Tech’s chance to win, from the site’s model. Records are through today. Networks as announced; the rest are set closer to kickoff.
How the season got here
Where Georgia Tech stood among 138 FBS programs by stature after each game (1st is the highest; the CFB Zeitgeist ledger).
Sep 21–27 · rebuiltL 27-34 at STANStanford3 headlines · 68th of 138
Each week as this page showed it at the time. Weeks marked rebuilt came before this page existed: they were built afterward from only what was known by the end of that week.
Each season is his team’s percentile among every team with that stat (the share it beat), averaged over his completed seasons here; a mid-season takeover year and the season in progress aren’t graded. Letters: A+ 90th percentile and up, A 80, B+ 70, B 60, B− 50, C+ 45, C 40, C− 30, D 15, F below.
Fans
Fan chatter
Oct 31L 11-34 at PittsburghFire Key, I'm serious nowGTGeorgia Tech fan
Oct 24L 27-49 vs. Boston CollegeSemore should be fired mid-game. Godsey should not be far behind. Brent Key should be on the hotseat.GTGeorgia Tech fan
Oct 17L 24-34 at Virginia TechFire Brent KeyGTGeorgia Tech fan
Earlier weeks
Oct 10W 28-25 vs. DukeKey on his way to make the absolute sorriest hires of all time.GTGeorgia Tech fan
Sep 26L 27-34 at StanfordFire Brent KeyGTGeorgia Tech fan
Sep 19W 44-11 vs. MercerAnyone have a picture of Key and his groomsmen? I want to start getting ahead researching Key’s next coaching hiresGTGeorgia Tech fan
Sep 12L 24-45 vs. TennesseeThe people calling to fire Key are out of their goddamn minds.GTGeorgia Tech fan
Sep 3L 13-14 vs. ColoradoYea fire Brent Key. I don’t care how much you love GT you are clearly not head coach materialGTGeorgia Tech fan
Several stories about him this week
Sat Nov 7: Louisville
48th of 104 FBS head coaches · from several outlets and r/CFB
Gold: stories about him each day. W and L: his games.
Gold: stories we tracked each season, drawn on a square-root scale so a quiet year still shows. Hatched: before we started tracking (2025). Earlier years had thinner coverage, so compare within a stop, not across decades.
Stories are headlines grouped by what they are about, counted through Nov 4.
Stats
Big games
The big-game ledger
How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.
0-4 against his rivals. Winless in 4 tries against Kirby Smart.
’22 L · blew a 7-pt lead’23 L · blew a 7-pt lead’24 L · blew a 17-pt lead’25 L · blew a 3-pt lead
covered the spread
0% win rate across a real, 4-meeting series — short of the bar this site uses before badging a series “Nemesis.” Shown here as the toughest matchup on record, not an algorithmic crown.
Performance by opponent class
Dynasty
0-2 0.0%ATS —
Blue Blood
1-3 25.0%ATS —
Power Program
4-8 33.3%ATS 5-7 12 of 12
National Program
14-7 66.7%ATS 10-10-1 21 of 21
Regional Program
6-6 50.0%ATS 5-7 12 of 12
ATS is his record against the spread: did his team beat the closing betting line, winning by more than it or losing by less? Lines start in 2013; a dash means fewer than 6 of those games had one. One-score games carry no spread record: a big favorite that wins a close game has almost always failed to cover, so that number would say nothing about the coach.
Signature games
7-8 vs. AP top 25 · 2-4 vs. the top 10
Every AP-ranked regular-season opponent, by rank (#1 at top) and year
’22’23’24’25’26
win loss · higher = higher-ranked opponent · dashed line = top 10
Signature wins
WPI
Pittsburgh · 2022
26-21
UpsetQuality opponent
WMI
Miami · 2023
23-20
UpsetQuality opponent
WUN
North Carolina · 2022
21-17
UpsetQuality opponent
Signature losses
LUG
Georgia · 2022
14-37
Rival
LBG
Bowling Green · 2023
27-38
Upset
LUG
Georgia · 2023
23-31
Rival
Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.
Called about what the situation called for under every play-caller.
3,099 run and pass snaps at Georgia Tech, 2022–2025, his own games, one row per offensive coordinator. Each cell is how much more often he passed than the rest of FBS did in the same situation (field zone, down, distance, score, quarter, same season), in percentage points.
passed moreran morewithin noise (95% range includes 0)
Pass rate, stint by stint
Where each stint’s offense sat between run-first and pass-first, and how far it moved from one season to the next, against the FBS-wide average of 41% pass. The band is that stint’s real season-to-season range, not a fixed-width box.
Pass rate — share of offensive plays that were pass attemptsfirst covered seasonmost recent covered seasonfull season-to-season range (3+ covered seasons)
How much that is, against every other stint
Season-to-season pass-rate range for all 449 FBS coaching stints with at least three covered seasons, 2004–2025.
Typical stint7.010.3 median14.8middle half of all stints
Georgia Tech9.1pt#263 of 449 · a typical amount
Building the roster
Five numbers on how he actually stocks a roster, from signing day to draft day.
His 4 ranked Georgia Tech classes of his own have averaged #39 nationally — best #21, worst #62.
2022
#54
Inherited
2023
#62
His class
2024
#33
His class
2025
#21
His class
2026
#41
His class
His class — he had the full signing cycleInherited — signed before he arrived
Rank is each signing class’s national recruiting rank (#1 is best). Only a class he had a full signing cycle to build counts as his; inherited and mid-transition classes still show here, faded, but stay out of the average.
Roster ownership
Roster ownership
100%His own players
of his 2026 roster arrived on his watch — 110 of 110 players. Nobody is left from before he was hired.
Of his own players on this roster, 29% came through the transfer portal; the rest are non-portal arrivals (high-school signees, JUCO transfers, walk-ons).
New players each season, 2022–2026
29% of his 252 new players since 2022 came through the portal (FBS programs, same seasons: 23%). His share was 30% in 2022 and 33% in 2026.
Graded on the players who arrived and the players who left together, his portal seasons came out better than most FBS programs’ in 1 and worse than most in 1 of the 5 seasons graded. our read
202214 of 46Portal grade: better than most — #17 of 131 FBS programs that season
202313 of 58Portal grade: about typical for FBS that season
20249 of 50Portal grade: worse than most — #114 of 134 FBS programs that season
202521 of 50Portal grade: about typical for FBS that season
202616 of 48Portal grade: about typical for FBS that season
Came through the portalNon-portal arrivalsFBS-wide share that season
Each player counts once, in the season he arrived. 2021, the first season of portal tracking here, is left off because its arrival records look incomplete (about 31 new players per FBS team, against 52 in 2022). Portal grade: the site’s position-value-weighted scoring (the same engine as the Portal Heat feed and the “Who won the portal” grade): the value of the players who came in minus the value of the ones who left, ranked against every FBS program’s grade that same season. A season with fewer than 4 transfers in and out is not graded.
“His own” means the player arrived while he was head coach; “inherited” means a predecessor brought him in.
Size up front
Size up front
+3 lbAgainst the FBS average
Offensive linemen on his Georgia Tech rosters have averaged within a few pounds of the FBS average (2022–2026). In the three seasons before he arrived, Georgia Tech’s line averaged within a few pounds of the FBS average.
Georgia Tech2022–2026+3 lb
−10FBS avg+10lb
His seasonsSame program, the seasons before he arrivedMiddle half of FBS coaching runs since 2010
Average listed weight of every offensive lineman on each season’s roster, holdovers included, against every FBS roster that season (2010 on; a program needs 3+ seasons under him to appear). Weights are the ones programs publish, and programs list differently. This describes size only — not scheme, and not quality.
Where he recruits
GATop state
is his biggest recruiting state: 66 of 108 signees (61%) across his 2022–2026 tenure, drawn from 14 states in all. Next: FL (12).
Where his signees came from, 2022–2026 (108 high-school, JUCO and prep signees)
88% of his signees come from GA and its 5 border states (FL 12, AL 10, SC 5, NC 1, TN 1).
Off this map: 9 signees to the west (LA 4, TX 3, others), 4 to the north (CT, MD, others) and 4 to the south (FL 4).
By region
South
104
Northeast
3
West
1
Roster distance from campus (Bobby Dodd Stadium, GA)
median hometown distance
92 mi
within 100 mi
51%
within 500 mi
81%
beyond 1,000 mi
3%
109 of 110 roster players with a known hometown (99% coverage)
The map counts signed recruits across his tenure; the distance figures cover his current roster, transfers and walk-ons included. Two different groups, kept separate on purpose.
The NFL pipeline
The NFL pipeline
5Drafted
players drafted into the NFL off his teams here. He brought in 3 of them himself; 2 arrived under Geoff Collins. 1 went in the first round.
His recruits 3Inherited 25 roster-verified · 0 estimated
Most recent picks first
Year
Pick
Player
Pos
NFL team
Note
2026
R1.26
Keylan Rutledge
Offensive Guard
Houston Texans
2026
R6.32
Jordan Van den Berg
Defensive Tackle
Chicago Bears
2025
R5.37
Jackson Hawes
Tight End
Buffalo Bills
2025
R7.37
Zeek Biggers
Defensive Tackle
Miami Dolphins
recruited under Geoff Collins
2023
R2.15
Keion White
Defensive End
New England Patriots
recruited under Geoff Collins
A pick counts toward his tenure when the player’s final college season was one he coached, a checkable rule rather than a claim about who developed the player. A blank note means the player is on a verified roster and arrived on his watch. “Estimated” means no roster record, so the final season is assumed to be the year before the draft.
News
Stories about him
Headlines, grouped by what they are about. Each is the outlet’s own.
Brent Key held Georgia Tech at National Program II for 5 seasons.
+2.6 pts over 5 seasons · top 22% of 3-5-season tenures (717 in sample)
12th-best Georgia Tech tenure of 14 by the numbers.
Followed Geoff Collins (2019–2022).
System Shift, on arrival
swipe to see every season
Season
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Trend
Record & result
Record
4-4
7-6
7-6
9-4
2-6
Postseason
—
W bowl
L bowl
L bowl
—
Coordinators
OC
Chip Long
Buster Faulkner / Chris Weinke
Buster Faulkner / Chris Weinke
Buster Faulkner / Chris Weinke
Chris Weinke / George Godsey
DC
Andrew Thacker
Andrew Thacker / Kevin Sherrer
Tyler Santucci
Blake Gideon
Jason Semore
Outcome — opponent-adjusted efficiency percentile
Offense
10
72
69
87
45
Defense
72
23
53
19
11
Tendencies — play-by-play, neutral script
1st-down pass%
48.2
32.1
34.6
37.6
43.1
Red-zone pass%
43.0
33.1
34.0
31.6
48.4
4th-down go%opp. territory
21.9
30.0
40.0
30.0
30.0
Recruiter or developer?
Performs about as expected for his recruiting talent on offense and underperforms his recruiting talent on defense.
Offense vs. talent
+2.8 pts
#98 of 208 · middle half
Defense vs. talent
-14.0 pts
#163 of 208 · bottom quarter
Recruiting talent is team-wide (no offense/defense split exists in the source data) -- both sides are scored against the same talent input, only the outcome is side-specific.
Who they bring in
Typical size for position, once adjusted for position mix.
A typical class-year mix of incoming transfers.
Avg. size (raw)
6′2″, 240 lbs
across 74 of 88 arrivals — unadjusted for position mix
Size vs. position-typical
+5.5 lbs
#88 of 255 · middle half
Avg. class year
Jr
#114 of 255 · middle half
Avg. portal rating
3.0★
rated arrivals only
Top states: GA (27), FL (13), TX (5), PA (4), AL (4)
Notable portal arrivals with a modeled NIL value
Justice Haynes On3 modeled · $1,000,000
On3’s modeled estimate (social reach / exposure), not money actually paid — shown per player, never totaled.
Who won the portal our read
Talent added
58.0
position-weighted
Talent lost
62.1
position-weighted
Net
-4.0
arrivals minus departures
Best addition: Zach Gibson (QB) from Akron
Biggest loss: Jeff Sims (QB) to Nebraska
Position-value-weighted (QB/CB weighted highest, depth-decayed within each position) — the same scoring engine as the Portal Heat feed, not a separate grade.
Does the system survive a coordinator change?
OC: Buster Faulkner / Chris Weinke (co) → Chris Weinke (co) / George Godsey · 2026
1-season window either side — numbers shown, not enough to badge a verdict.
1st-down pass rate: 37.6% → 43.1% (+5.4 pts)
Confound, shown not hidden: only 13% of offensive production returned the year the coordinator changed — the roster turned over at the same time, not just the play-caller.
DC: Andrew Thacker (co) / Kevin Sherrer → Tyler Santucci · 2024
1-season window either side — numbers shown, not enough to badge a verdict.
DC: Tyler Santucci → Blake Gideon · 2025
1-season window either side — numbers shown, not enough to badge a verdict.
DC: Blake Gideon → Jason Semore · 2026
1-season window either side — numbers shown, not enough to badge a verdict.
Where the roster comes from, by position
Buys Tight end via the portal
71%
#21 of 188 stints
Grows Kicker from high school
100%
#52 of 56 stints
Grows Interior line from high school
76%
#172 of 224 stints
Postseason detail2023: Beat UCF 30-17 Union Home Mortgage Gasparilla Bowl2024: Lost to Vanderbilt 27-35 Birmingham Bowl2025: Lost to BYU 21-25 Pop-Tarts Bowl
AI Narratives — “Georgia Tech's Ups and Downs in 2025” and 2 more on the team page.