Game log · Week-by-week
2023 season · 2 games
| Wk | Opp | TKL | SOLO | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 5 | W 35-27vs Cincinnati | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | Season-high 1 tackles |
| Wk 13 | L 34-40@ Oklahoma State | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Total | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 |
Junior linebacker for BYU. 2023: 2 tackles.
6′2″ · 211 lb · Highland, UT
The story
3 linebacker for BYU. 2023: 2 tackles.
The record fills in as he plays.
His career, year by yearAmmon Hannemann
Is steady in every phase without a signature trait. Fourth year in the BYU linebacker corps, same address the whole way. The receipt: 1 tackles against Oklahoma State — Week 13, 2023.
Low coverage — composed from the verified record.
How it ended
Four seasons at BYU, 58 tackles — his college career is complete.
Career arc
Coaching lineage · 2019–2023
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Kalani Sitake.
Season context · Team result + system
4 seasons under Kalani Sitake — 30-21 over that span.
Where this defender ranks vs the field
Box-score production percentiles vs the position cohort
Concern: tackles (0th percentile).
Percentiles are versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score production. There are no play-by-play efficiency bars here: CFBD's play-value model credits offensive players only, so no defensive EPA exists to rank.
Splits
Per-game splits
Through 2 games: 1.0 TKL/g, 0.0 TFL/g, 0.0 SACK/g, 0.0 PD/g — splits start at 3 games.
Supporting cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Kalani Sitake
Scheme reads (pass share, tempo, sack rate) need at least 3 team games — 2 games in so far.
Player standing · 2022
Tackle volume for the position in rotation-piece range.
Game log · Week-by-week
2023 season · 2 games
| Wk | Opp | TKL | SOLO | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 5 | W 35-27vs Cincinnati | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | Season-high 1 tackles |
| Wk 13 | L 34-40@ Oklahoma State | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Total | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 |
Play style
Solid in every phase without a signature dimension.
CFB Index positional classification
Player DNA
Solid in every phase without a signature dimension.
His 2022 production profile sits closest to Brandon Bischof’s 2021 season.
Matches Brandon on
Differs from Brandon on
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
As a junior, his production profile tracks closest to Brandon Bischof's junior season at Akron (2021).
Matches Brandon on
Player DNA