Brycen Scott
A game that shows it: 7 tackles against NC State — Week 5, 2026.
17 tackles · 0 sacks
Play style
Erases the deep middle of the field.
Activity vs finishing · season enumeration
What the box score actually says
17 tackles. 3 passes defended. 0 interceptions. 0 TFL.
Counts only, never a rate — splash-event sample sizes this small (interceptions, pass breakups, TFL) are noise as a rate and signal only as a tally.
Closest statistical matches, adjusted for opponent strength.
No outlet on our list has written about this player by name this season.
Swipe the table sideways for more columns.
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Louisville | 17 | 11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3 |
| Career | 17 | 11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3 |
Last game (Wk 9): 1 tackle.
Game log · Week-by-week
2026 season · 8 games
Swipe the table sideways for more columns.
| Wk | Opp | TKL | SOLO | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | L 38-41vs No. 9 Ole Miss | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 2 | W 59-13vs Villanova | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 1 | |
| Wk 3 | W 41-31vs No. 16 SMU | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 4 | L 27-30vs Wake Forest | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 5 | L 28-31@ NC State | 7 | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 2 | Season-high 7 tackles |
| Wk 6 | W 44-20vs Florida State | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 7 | W 34-26@ Syracuse | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 9 | W 52-24vs Stanford | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Total | 17 | 11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 3 |
Oct. 31 · W 52-24 vs Stanford, play by play
1 tackle.
Each small tick is one of his tackles on the play-by-play. His sacks are drawn as sacks.
His game this year: coverage — 3 passes defended in the 8 games with play by play.
How Louisville’s defense played that day
Stanford’s 13 drives: 9 stopped (2 takeaways) · 4 scored. While the game was within a score they held 5 of 9.
1 tackle.
2 tackles.
Each small tick is one of his tackles on the play-by-play. His sacks are drawn as sacks.
7 tackles, including 2 passes broken up, tied for 2nd-most passes broken up in FBS that week.
Each small tick is one of his tackles on the play-by-play: 6 of his 7, sacks included.
2 tackles.
Each small tick is one of his tackles on the play-by-play. His sacks are drawn as sacks.
2 tackles. The fumble he forced ended SMU’s drive (fumble).
Each small tick is one of his tackles on the play-by-play. His sacks are drawn as sacks.
Forced a fumble. Fourth quarter, up 41-31. Ended SMU’s drive (fumble).
0 tackles, including 1 pass broken up.
2 tackles.
Each small tick is one of his tackles on the play-by-play. His sacks are drawn as sacks.
Ratings of the games shown run from -11 to +15 points against an average team (SP+ rating of each opponent).
Where his impact shows up on the stat sheet
PD rate
18%3 pass breakupsTackle volume
17tackles this seasonTFL rate
0%0 TFL17 tackles · 3 pass breakups.
Splits · Per-game
2026 season · 8 games
Home vs Road
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home5g | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Road2g | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 |
First half vs Second half
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-77g | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Weeks 8+1g | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Supporting cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Jeff Brohm
Pass share
43.9%
215 pass / 275 run
Plays / game
61.2
8 games
Team sack rate
5.8%
241 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-leaning, slow tempo.
Player standing · 2026
Fewer tackles a game than most FBS defensive backs who play every week.
Recognition
Production · CFB Zeitgeist Score
2026 is in progress.
