Akron

1-1

Mid-American · Joe Moorhead, year 5 (14-36) · InfoCision Stadium · 30,000 · 10,032 avg in 2026

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#62 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #128 (-21.4) · FPI #127
The marketMinnesota by 24at Minnesota · our model 33% Akron · a number, not a pick

LastW 45–10 vs Robert Morris · Sat Sep 12 · Cibastian Broughton 227 pass yds, 4 TD, 71 rush yds

Nextat Minnesota · Sat Sep 19 · 12 pm ET · Huntington Bank Stadium · Minnesota by 24 · first meeting on record · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

Key stats — 2026 — FBS rank
Points/game
30.5
Pts allowed/game
24.0
Total yards/gmT-#72 / 138 · 48th pct
414.0
Rush yards/gmT-#49 / 138 · 64th pct
195.0
Pass yards/gmT-#84 / 138 · 39th pct
219.0
Yards allowed/gm#97 / 138 · 30th pct
376.5
Rush yds allowed/gm#60 / 138 · 57th pct
108.5
SacksT-#128 / 138 · 5th pct
1
3rd-down convT-#52 / 138 · 62nd pct
45.8%
All 77 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
828414.0/gm5.87/playT-#72 / 138 · 48th pctT-#43 / 70 · 39th pct#4 / 13 · 73rd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
753376.5/gm6.44/play#97 / 138 · 30th pct#59 / 70 · 16th pct#5 / 13 · 65th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush yards
Team
390195.0/gm2.77/playT-#49 / 138 · 64th pct#27 / 70 · 62nd pct#1 / 13 · 96th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
217108.5/gm1.85/play#60 / 138 · 57th pct#45 / 70 · 36th pct#3 / 13 · 81st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush carries
Team
7537.5/gmT-#71 / 138 · 49th pctT-#38 / 70 · 46th pct#5 / 13 · 65th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
5226.0/gmT-#12 / 138 · 91st pctT-#8 / 70 · 89th pct#2 / 13 · 88th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush TDs
Team
21.0/gmT-#106 / 138 · 18th pctT-#56 / 70 · 15th pctT-#9 / 13 · 27th pct#12 / 13 · 15th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#24 / 138 · 73rd pctT-#18 / 70 · 64th pctT-#2 / 13 · 77th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Net pass yards
Team
438219.0/gm3.11/playT-#84 / 138 · 39th pct#53 / 70 · 25th pctT-#5 / 13 · 62nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
536268.0/gm4.58/playT-#116 / 138 · 16th pctT-#65 / 70 · 7th pct#7 / 13 · 50th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass attempts
Team
6633.0/gm#48 / 138 · 66th pct#24 / 70 · 66th pct#5 / 13 · 65th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
6532.5/gmT-#92 / 138 · 33rd pctT-#47 / 70 · 33rd pct#6 / 13 · 58th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Completions
Team
5628.0/gm#15 / 138 · 89th pct#7 / 70 · 91st pct#3 / 13 · 81st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
4221.0/gmT-#102 / 138 · 25th pctT-#56 / 70 · 20th pctT-#8 / 13 · 38th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass TDs
Team
63.0/gmT-#17 / 138 · 83rd pctT-#14 / 70 · 74th pctT-#1 / 13 · 92nd pct#12 / 13 · 15th pct
Opp
42.0/gmT-#103 / 138 · 19th pctT-#62 / 70 · 9th pctT-#5 / 13 · 54th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Interceptions thrown
Team
00.0/gmT-#92 / 138 · 17th pctT-#42 / 70 · 21st pctT-#11 / 13 · 12th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 92nd pctT-#1 / 70 · 92nd pctT-#1 / 13 · 85th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Sacks (def)
Team
10.5/gmT-#128 / 138 · 5th pctT-#68 / 70 · 2nd pct#13 / 13 · 4th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
52.5/gmT-#101 / 138 · 20th pctT-#56 / 70 · 14th pctT-#10 / 13 · 23rd pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
Tackles for loss
Team
73.5/gmT-#111 / 138 · 16th pctT-#61 / 70 · 11th pctT-#8 / 13 · 38th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
168.0/gmT-#129 / 138 · 6th pct#69 / 70 · 2nd pct#11 / 13 · 19th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
First downs
Team
4824.0/gmT-#46 / 138 · 65th pctT-#31 / 70 · 54th pct#2 / 13 · 88th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3216.0/gmT-#46 / 138 · 65th pctT-#35 / 70 · 48th pct#1 / 13 · 96th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down conv
Team
115.5/gmT-#63 / 138 · 52nd pctT-#37 / 70 · 44th pct#7 / 13 · 50th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
115.5/gmT-#80 / 138 · 39th pctT-#50 / 70 · 28th pctT-#7 / 13 · 46th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down att
Team
2412.0/gmT-#81 / 138 · 38th pctT-#39 / 70 · 42nd pctT-#9 / 13 · 31st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
2713.5/gmT-#54 / 138 · 59th pctT-#28 / 70 · 58th pctT-#6 / 13 · 54th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down conv
Team
10.5/gmT-#85 / 138 · 29th pctT-#44 / 70 · 32nd pctT-#8 / 13 · 27th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#71 / 138 · 37th pctT-#40 / 70 · 32nd pctT-#4 / 13 · 54th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down att
Team
31.5/gmT-#66 / 138 · 41st pctT-#35 / 70 · 44th pctT-#5 / 13 · 50th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#20 / 138 · 74th pctT-#10 / 70 · 72nd pctT-#2 / 13 · 77th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Time of possession
Team
65:5032:55/gm#43 / 138 · 69th pct#19 / 70 · 74th pct#4 / 13 · 73rd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
54:1027:05/gm#34 / 138 · 76th pct#19 / 70 · 74th pct#2 / 13 · 88th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats — 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
+0.24 EPA/play11244 / 5383.03386.44
#36 FBS
0161.53966.26.97.0
+2.18 EPA/play6212 / 1392.31007.720207.783.6
Running Backs
Player#GCarYdsAvgTDLongStuff%10+%
+0.03 EPA/play1220964.8114
Receivers
Player#GRecYdsAvgTDLong
+0.49 EPA/play8327618.73
#9 FBS
25
+0.33 EPA/play141530609
-0.61 EPA/play8715214.207

2026 stat leaders · Akron

through 2 games

Donelius Johnson leads Akron with 15 tackles through 2 games.

1. Donelius Johnson LB 15 tackles
2. Rodrick Hunter S 10 tackles
3. Cibastian Broughton QB 338 passing yards
4. Omari Abor DE 8 tackles
5. Daunte Curtis LB 8 tackles
How They Play · 2025

Akron fields a struggling offense behind a solid, gives up the big play defense.

Offense
12th pct EPA/play
Defense
50th pct EPA allowed
Defensive shape
22nd pct at limiting explosive plays

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

The Savant Card · Akron · 2025

Akron reads strongest in success rate allowed (top 42%) and passing epa allowed (top 42%); the crux lives in epa / play, where Akron sits at the 12th percentile.

offense · strengths lead

EPA / play +0.06
12th
Success Rate +0.39
21st
Explosive Plays +1.19
20th
Rushing EPA +0.00
15th

defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA Allowed +0.15
50th
Success Rate Allowed +0.40
58th
Explosive Plays Allowed +1.33
22nd
Passing EPA Allowed +0.22
58th

hidden math · special situations

Passing EPA +0.18
22nd
Rushing EPA Allowed +0.08
50th
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 12 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 136 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · Akron · 2018–present · FBS opponents

Akron is worth +3.2 points more at home than on the road.

Middle of FBS, 34th percentile of 133 programs

20% at home, 14% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (7–28 home, 7–43 away). Interval ±4.2.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, Akron has beaten the number by −1.3 more at home than away over 73 games — inside the ±6.9 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

InfoCision Stadium seats 30,000 and has averaged 27% full (8,202, 22 games reported). Visitors get here easily: a median 193 miles trip since 2018, the 7th-shortest of 135 FBS venues. There is no travel penalty on visitors here either way. 22% of the 2026 roster (28 of 127 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 42 home games since 2018.

Home7–28Away7–43Edge+3.2 ±4.2Visitor trip193 mi

More in this tab

Tendency driftHow this coordinator's calls have drifted since arriving.

Season by season

How Akron’s current staff calls plays, year over year

Defense: Tim Tibesar (2022–2026)
1st-down pass rate
2022: 62% → 2026: 48% · 20-pt range · #19 of 203 · more than most
Red-zone pass rate
2022: 49% → 2026: 50% · 20-pt range · #42 of 200 · more than most
4th-down go rate
2022: 34% → 2025: 29% · 6-pt range · #180 of 189 · less than most
Pass defense by zoneThe part of the field opponents keep attacking.

Pass-depth identity

What this team throws, and gives up, by depth.

On short throws (≤19 air yards), Akron’s passing game completes a completion rate above the FBS mean (75.8% vs 68.3% league-wide, shrunk toward the mean for its 61-play sample) — most aggressive underneath, 41 of 41 qualifying offenses.

We won’t show a deep-ball (20+ air yards) leaderboard here, on either side of the ball: even a full season of charted plays gives most teams well under 30 deep attempts — too thin to tell a real tendency from noise, so we won’t guess. Same refusal for yards-after-catch allowed and where a team’s attempts land by zone: both measured and both came back statistically indistinguishable from season-to-season noise.

Screened 59 claims, 59 survived · 2025+ only, charted plays (parse_status='complete'); n=61 short-zone plays, raw rate 85.2%
RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Model Consensus

Where the Models Rank Akron

CFB Zeitgeist

#62

+1.1

SP+

#128

-21.4

FPI

#127

-15.8

Elo

#138

905

The national models put Akron between 127th and 138th nationally — CFB Zeitgeist is higher on them than any of these models, at 62nd.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · Akron

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

ConditionsThe weather and altitude visitors have to deal with.
Venue texture

58°F average kickoff temp; 11% of games had measurable precipitation; 9 mph average wind.

Based on 66 home games with weather data.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site