Baylor

1-1

Big 12 · Dave Aranda, year 7 (37-38) · McLane Stadium · 45,140 · 38,642 avg in 2026

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#34 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #52 (+4.9) · FPI #35
The marketBaylor by 19.5vs Louisiana Tech · our model 78% Baylor · a number, not a pick

LastW 44–3 vs Prairie View A&M · Sat Sep 12 · Nate Bennett 301 pass yds, 2 TD, 2 INT

Nextvs Louisiana Tech · Sat Sep 19 · 4 pm ET · McLane Stadium · Baylor by 19.5 · series 5-1, won the last 2 · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

Key stats — 2026 — FBS rank
Points/game
30.0
Pts allowed/game
10.0
Total yards/gm#33 / 138 · 76th pct
494.0
Rush yards/gmT-#74 / 138 · 46th pct
167.5
Pass yards/gm#20 / 138 · 86th pct
326.5
Yards allowed/gm#28 / 138 · 80th pct
249.5
Rush yds allowed/gm#32 / 138 · 77th pct
83.0
SacksT-#6 / 138 · 96th pct
9
InterceptionsT-#17 / 115 · 81st pct
3
3rd-down convT-#68 / 138 · 51st pct
41.7%
All 92 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
988494.0/gm5.40/play#33 / 138 · 76th pct#22 / 69 · 69th pct#6 / 16 · 66th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
499249.5/gm3.90/play#28 / 138 · 80th pct#25 / 69 · 64th pct#5 / 16 · 72nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush yards
Team
335167.5/gm1.83/playT-#74 / 138 · 46th pct#39 / 69 · 44th pct#13 / 16 · 22nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
16683.0/gm1.30/play#32 / 138 · 77th pct#26 / 69 · 63rd pct#7 / 16 · 59th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush carries
Team
8743.5/gmT-#25 / 138 · 82nd pctT-#10 / 69 · 85th pctT-#3 / 16 · 78th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
6633.0/gmT-#58 / 138 · 58th pctT-#39 / 69 · 43rd pct#12 / 16 · 28th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush TDs
Team
31.5/gmT-#77 / 138 · 34th pctT-#45 / 69 · 28th pctT-#14 / 16 · 12th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#53 / 138 · 50th pctT-#34 / 69 · 36th pctT-#8 / 16 · 31st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Net pass yards
Team
653326.5/gm3.57/play#20 / 138 · 86th pct#11 / 69 · 85th pct#2 / 16 · 91st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
333166.5/gm2.60/playT-#42 / 138 · 70th pctT-#31 / 69 · 55th pctT-#4 / 16 · 75th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass attempts
Team
9648.0/gm#8 / 138 · 95th pct#2 / 69 · 98th pct#1 / 16 · 97th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
6231.0/gmT-#79 / 138 · 41st pctT-#42 / 69 · 38th pctT-#9 / 16 · 44th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Completions
Team
5226.0/gmT-#21 / 138 · 84th pctT-#9 / 69 · 87th pct#2 / 16 · 91st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
4020.0/gmT-#90 / 138 · 34th pctT-#51 / 69 · 26th pct#13 / 16 · 22nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass TDs
Team
42.0/gmT-#48 / 138 · 57th pctT-#33 / 69 · 46th pctT-#7 / 16 · 50th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 96th pctT-#1 / 69 · 93rd pctT-#1 / 16 · 91st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Passer rating
Team
118.8118.8#90 / 115 · 22nd pct#50 / 59 · 16th pct#14 / 14 · 4th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
96.796.7#12 / 91 · 87th pct#8 / 41 · 82nd pct#3 / 10 · 75th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Interceptions thrown
Team
42.0/gmT-#3 / 138 · 97th pctT-#2 / 69 · 96th pctT-#1 / 16 · 94th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
31.5/gmT-#110 / 138 · 16th pctT-#60 / 69 · 11th pct#15 / 16 · 9th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Sacks (def)
Team
94.5/gmT-#6 / 138 · 96th pct#6 / 69 · 92nd pct#1 / 16 · 97th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#33 / 138 · 67th pctT-#20 / 69 · 62nd pctT-#7 / 16 · 53rd pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
Tackles for loss
Team
189.0/gmT-#10 / 138 · 92nd pctT-#5 / 69 · 92nd pctT-#1 / 16 · 91st pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
115.5/gmT-#81 / 138 · 34th pctT-#47 / 69 · 27th pct#14 / 16 · 16th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
First downs
Team
5929.5/gmT-#11 / 138 · 92nd pctT-#5 / 69 · 93rd pct#1 / 16 · 97th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3115.5/gmT-#42 / 138 · 69th pctT-#32 / 69 · 53rd pct#10 / 16 · 41st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down conv
Team
157.5/gmT-#20 / 138 · 83rd pctT-#10 / 69 · 84th pctT-#3 / 16 · 78th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
147.0/gmT-#111 / 138 · 17th pctT-#60 / 69 · 12th pct#16 / 16 · 3rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down att
Team
3618.0/gmT-#10 / 138 · 92nd pctT-#1 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 16 · 97th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3417.0/gmT-#118 / 138 · 14th pctT-#65 / 69 · 6th pctT-#15 / 16 · 6th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down conv
Team
63.0/gmT-#2 / 138 · 99th pctT-#1 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 16 · 97th pct#12 / 13 · 15th pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 91st pctT-#1 / 69 · 90th pctT-#1 / 16 · 91st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down att
Team
84.0/gmT-#6 / 138 · 95th pctT-#2 / 69 · 96th pctT-#1 / 16 · 91st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#3 / 138 · 92nd pctT-#2 / 69 · 93rd pctT-#1 / 16 · 94th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Time of possession
Team
66:5433:27/gm#36 / 138 · 74th pct#14 / 69 · 80th pct#4 / 16 · 78th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
53:0626:33/gm#27 / 138 · 81st pct#14 / 69 · 80th pct#4 / 16 · 78th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats — 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
+0.29 EPA/play2127 / 54503336.221110.3495.81.8
+0.43 EPA/play12123 / 3565.73018.622145.429.6
Running Backs
Player#GCarYdsAvgTDLongStuff%10+%
Workhorse · +0.19 EPA/play35240157
#54 FBS
3.9013
+0.18 EPA/play11224994.1115
Receivers
Player#GRecYdsAvgTDLong
Slot Technician · +0.66 EPA/play6222258
#7 FBS
11.7132
+0.87 EPA/play4268313.8121
-0.06 EPA/play3157715.4027

2026 stat leaders · Baylor

through 2 games

Gavin Freeman leads Baylor with 258 receiving yards through 2 games.

1. Gavin Freeman WR 258 receiving yards
2. Travion Barnes LB 13 tackles
3. Dawson Pendergrass RB 157 rushing yards
4. Devin Turner S 9 tackles
5. Kyland Reed LB 9 tackles
How They Play · 2025

Baylor fields a strong pass-first offense behind a leaky, bend-don't-break defense.

Offense
70th pct EPA/play
Run/Pass
55% pass plays
Defense
40th pct EPA allowed
Defensive shape
86th pct at limiting explosive plays

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

The Savant Card · Baylor · 2025

Baylor reads strongest in explosive plays allowed (top 14%) and success rate (top 27%); the crux lives in success rate allowed, where Baylor sits at the 29th percentile.

offense · strengths lead

EPA / play +0.20
70th
Success Rate +0.45
73rd
Explosive Plays +1.30
69th
Rushing EPA +0.15
66th

defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA Allowed +0.17
40th
Success Rate Allowed +0.43
29th
Explosive Plays Allowed +1.16
86th
Passing EPA Allowed +0.27
39th

hidden math · special situations

Passing EPA +0.25
47th
Rushing EPA Allowed +0.11
36th
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 12 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 136 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · Baylor · 2018–present · FBS opponents

Baylor is worth +1.2 points more at home than on the road.

Bottom tenth of FBS, 7th percentile of 133 programs

55% at home, 46% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (24–20 home, 19–22 away). Interval ±4.0.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, Baylor has beaten the number by −4.2 more at home than away over 71 games — inside the ±6.9 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

McLane Stadium seats 45,140 and has averaged 94% full (42,444, 28 games reported). Visitors cover a median 522 miles to get here since 2018 — 42nd-longest of 135 FBS venues, inside the ordinary range. For the home side it is genuinely home ground: 28% of the 2026 roster (39 of 139 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 52 home games since 2018.

Home24–20Away19–22Edge+1.2 ±4.0Visitor trip522 mi

More in this tab

Position battlesReps are split -- here's who's actually winning them.

Positional competition · RB room

The carries are split. The job isn’t.

Dawson Pendergrass and Caden Knighten split the carries (40/63 vs 23/63) -- but the job isn't split the same way.

Dawson PendergrassCaden Knighten
Carries
4023
the baseline -- every row below is tested against this split, not a flat 50/50
Targets
5/83/8
shared -- dots touch, this room really is a committee here
Top-5-carry share
28.7%48.0%
concentration alone -- EPA/carry doesn't corroborate, read with caution
Screened 2 claims, 0 survived, 2 falsified
Scheme claimsFive specific, testable claims about how this team plays.

Fourth-quarter reliability, corrected

Baylor's 4th-quarter offense, before and after garbage time

Raw Q4 EPA/play ranks 35th percentile in FBS. Strip out snaps taken with a blowout margin and it climbs to the 42nd — the correction is the finding, not a footnote.

league medianRaw 4th quarter · 35th pctileCompetitive snaps only · 42nd pctileWorst in FBSBest in FBS
Source CFB Zeitgeist · CFBD play-by-play, garbage-time adjusted by pre-play margin

Standard downs vs. passing downs

Does Baylor hold up once the down-and-distance turns against them?

40th percentile success on standard downs, 96th on passing downs — a 56-point gap between the two.

Fragile off scheduleBalanced, both workStruggles even on scheduleStandard-downs reliantBaylorWeak on standard downsElite on standard downsFalls apart off scheduleHolds up off scheduleHawai'i18th standard · 41st passingUNLV51st standard · 7th passingStanford76th standard · 15th passingEastern Michigan52nd standard · 10th passingSan José State54th standard · 22nd passingNew Mexico State45th standard · 75th passingSacramento State23rd standard · 14th passingOklahoma State41st standard · 49th passingDuke20th standard · 29th passingFlorida State28th standard · 65th passingRutgers30th standard · 71st passingKansas70th standard · 35th passingBoston College27th standard · 56th passingNorfolk State16th standard · 9th passingLouisville96th standard · 70th passingMissouri36th standard · 85th passingMemphis69th standard · 65th passingGeorgia Southern24th standard · 45th passingOle Miss94th standard · 50th passingJacksonville State65th standard · 82nd passingNorth Dakota State86th standard · 27th passingArizona92nd standard · 86th passingUSC97th standard · 99th passingWake Forest56th standard · 97th passingTCU93rd standard · 8th passingDelaware70th standard · 31st passingUAB65th standard · 81st passingMichigan State62nd standard · 29th passingSouth Florida91st standard · 52nd passingFlorida International46th standard · 43rd passingNavy98th standard · 59th passingWisconsin13th standard · 18th passingOregon State10th standard · 38th passingSyracuse48th standard · 64th passingOhio State90th standard · 40th passingBall State12th standard · 24th passingPittsburgh30th standard · 76th passingColorado35th standard · 77th passingGeorgia Tech58th standard · 44th passingAuburn75th standard · 55th passingBaylor40th standard · 96th passingNorth Texas49th standard · 68th passingApp State44th standard · 90th passingIowa State4th standard · 23rd passingUTSA99th standard · 29th passingArkansas60th standard · 80th passingBoise State58th standard · 46th passingOregon35th standard · 33rd passingTulsa56th standard · 1st passingTulane31st standard · 2nd passingPurdue83rd standard · 88th passingMiddle Tennessee87th standard · 68th passingVanderbilt80th standard · 12th passingSan Diego State4th standard · 40th passingLSU33rd standard · 98th passingClemson1st standard · 19th passingCentral Michigan16th standard · 6th passingTexas Tech88th standard · 48th passingMichigan2nd standard · 62nd passingWestern Michigan39th standard · 20th passingOhio38th standard · 17th passingBuffalo7th standard · 14th passingTexas72nd standard · 94th passingCoastal Carolina61st standard · 52nd passingColorado State82nd standard · 91st passingWyoming65th standard · 36th passingTexas A&M85th standard · 72nd passingLiberty14th standard · 59th passingFlorida Atlantic43rd standard · 87th passingLouisiana19th standard · 92nd passingSouth Alabama50th standard · 73rd passingTroy22nd standard · 59th passingSam Houston78th standard · 61st passingNevada77th standard · 52nd passingWestern Kentucky25th standard · 34th passingWashington State8th standard · 3rd passingWashington81st standard · 4th passingCalifornia9th standard · 25th passingCharlotte73rd standard · 83rd passingTennessee65th standard · 78th passingUtah State4th standard · 93rd passing
Source CFB Zeitgeist · advanced team stats, Connelly success-rate definition
View all FBS teams as a table
TeamStandard-downs percentilePassing-downs percentile
App State44th90th
Arizona92nd86th
Arkansas60th80th
Auburn75th55th
Ball State12th24th
Baylor40th96th
Boise State58th46th
Boston College27th56th
Buffalo7th14th
California9th25th
Central Michigan16th6th
Charlotte73rd83rd
Clemson1st19th
Coastal Carolina61st52nd
Colorado35th77th
Colorado State82nd91st
Delaware70th31st
Duke20th29th
Eastern Michigan52nd10th
Florida Atlantic43rd87th
Florida International46th43rd
Florida State28th65th
Georgia Southern24th45th
Georgia Tech58th44th
Hawai'i18th41st
Iowa State4th23rd
Jacksonville State65th82nd
Kansas70th35th
LSU33rd98th
Liberty14th59th
Louisiana19th92nd
Louisville96th70th
Memphis69th65th
Michigan2nd62nd
Michigan State62nd29th
Middle Tennessee87th68th
Missouri36th85th
Navy98th59th
Nevada77th52nd
New Mexico State45th75th
Norfolk State16th9th
North Dakota State86th27th
North Texas49th68th
Ohio38th17th
Ohio State90th40th
Oklahoma State41st49th
Ole Miss94th50th
Oregon35th33rd
Oregon State10th38th
Pittsburgh30th76th
Purdue83rd88th
Rutgers30th71st
Sacramento State23rd14th
Sam Houston78th61st
San Diego State4th40th
San José State54th22nd
South Alabama50th73rd
South Florida91st52nd
Stanford76th15th
Syracuse48th64th
TCU93rd8th
Tennessee65th78th
Texas72nd94th
Texas A&M85th72nd
Texas Tech88th48th
Troy22nd59th
Tulane31st2nd
Tulsa56th1st
UAB65th81st
UNLV51st7th
USC97th99th
UTSA99th29th
Utah State4th93rd
Vanderbilt80th12th
Wake Forest56th97th
Washington81st4th
Washington State8th3rd
Western Kentucky25th34th
Western Michigan39th20th
Wisconsin13th18th
Wyoming65th36th

Halftime identity

Baylor by half

1st-half offense ranks 52nd percentile in FBS; 2nd-half, 13th — competitive snaps only, garbage time excluded from both halves.

league median1st half · 52nd pctile2nd half · 13th…Worst in FBSBest in FBS
Source CFB Zeitgeist · advanced team stats, garbage-time adjusted by pre-play margin
Tendency driftHow this coordinator's calls have drifted since arriving.

Season by season

How Baylor’s current staff calls plays, year over year

Offense: Jake Spavital (2024–2026)
1st-down pass rate
2024: 48% → 2026: 40% · 20-pt range · #18 of 184 · more than most
Red-zone pass rate
2024: 36% → 2026: 41% · 19-pt range · #39 of 182 · more than most
4th-down go rate
2024: 61% → 2025: 65% · 3-pt range · #170 of 172 · less than most
Pass defense by zoneThe part of the field opponents keep attacking.

Pass-depth identity

What this team throws, and gives up, by depth.

On short throws (≤19 air yards), Baylor’s passing game completes a completion rate below the FBS mean (63.2% vs 68.3% league-wide, shrunk toward the mean for its 79-play sample) — mid-pack, 5 of 41 qualifying offenses.

We won’t show a deep-ball (20+ air yards) leaderboard here, on either side of the ball: even a full season of charted plays gives most teams well under 30 deep attempts — too thin to tell a real tendency from noise, so we won’t guess. Same refusal for yards-after-catch allowed and where a team’s attempts land by zone: both measured and both came back statistically indistinguishable from season-to-season noise.

Screened 59 claims, 59 survived · 2025+ only, charted plays (parse_status='complete'); n=79 short-zone plays, raw rate 58.2%
RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Model Consensus

Where the Models Rank Baylor

CFB Zeitgeist

#34

+4.9

SP+

#52

+4.9

FPI

#35

+8.2

Elo

#63

1509

The national models put Baylor between 35th and 63rd nationally — CFB Zeitgeist is higher on them than any of these models, at 34th.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · Baylor

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

ConditionsThe weather and altitude visitors have to deal with.
Venue texture

76°F average kickoff temp; 10% of games had measurable precipitation; 9 mph average wind.

Based on 77 home games with weather data.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site