Miami

2-0AP #5

ACC · Mario Cristobal, year 5 (37-19) · Hard Rock Stadium · 64,767 · 63,618 avg in 2026

The nationAP #5 · Coaches #5up 2 from last week
The model#7 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #5 (+24.7) · FPI #5
The marketMiami by 21at Wake Forest · our model 82% Miami · a number, not a pick

LastW 77–7 vs Florida A&M · Thu Sep 10 · Javian Mallory 142 rush yds, 2 TD

Nextat Wake Forest · Fri Sep 18 · 7:30 pm ET · Allegacy Federal Credit Union Stadium · Miami by 21 · series 9-3, won the last 8 · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

Key stats — 2026 — FBS rank
Points/game
61.0
Pts allowed/game
6.5
Total yards/gm#3 / 138 · 98th pct
702.5
Rush yards/gm#12 / 138 · 92nd pct
275.5
Pass yards/gm#3 / 138 · 98th pct
427.0
Yards allowed/gm#11 / 138 · 92nd pct
203.0
Rush yds allowed/gm#8 / 138 · 95th pct
57.5
SacksT-#80 / 138 · 33rd pct
3
3rd-down conv#6 / 138 · 96th pct
64.3%
All 76 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
1405702.5/gm10.04/play#3 / 138 · 98th pct#2 / 69 · 98th pct#1 / 17 · 97th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
406203.0/gm3.62/play#11 / 138 · 92nd pct#10 / 69 · 86th pct#3 / 17 · 85th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush yards
Team
551275.5/gm3.94/play#12 / 138 · 92nd pct#8 / 69 · 89th pct#1 / 17 · 97th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
11557.5/gm1.03/play#8 / 138 · 95th pct#7 / 69 · 91st pct#2 / 17 · 91st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush carries
Team
7638.0/gmT-#62 / 138 · 53rd pctT-#31 / 69 · 51st pct#7 / 17 · 62nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
4422.0/gm#3 / 138 · 98th pct#3 / 69 · 96th pct#2 / 17 · 91st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush TDs
Team
63.0/gmT-#27 / 138 · 78th pctT-#19 / 69 · 71st pct#4 / 17 · 79th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 92nd pctT-#1 / 69 · 88th pctT-#1 / 17 · 88th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Net pass yards
Team
854427.0/gm6.10/play#3 / 138 · 98th pct#3 / 69 · 96th pct#2 / 17 · 91st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
291145.5/gm2.60/playT-#30 / 138 · 78th pct#25 / 69 · 64th pct#6 / 17 · 68th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass attempts
Team
6432.0/gmT-#51 / 138 · 62nd pctT-#25 / 69 · 61st pctT-#7 / 17 · 56th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
6834.0/gmT-#97 / 138 · 29th pctT-#49 / 69 · 28th pctT-#10 / 17 · 41st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Completions
Team
5728.5/gmT-#13 / 138 · 91st pctT-#5 / 69 · 93rd pct#2 / 17 · 91st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3316.5/gmT-#50 / 138 · 60th pctT-#31 / 69 · 51st pctT-#6 / 17 · 65th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass TDs
Team
115.5/gm#1 / 138 · 99th pct#1 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 17 · 97th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 96th pctT-#1 / 69 · 93rd pctT-#1 / 17 · 91st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Passer rating allowed#2 / 91 · 98th pct#2 / 41 · 96th pct#1 / 10 · 95th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
81.581.5
Interceptions thrown
Team
10.5/gmT-#52 / 138 · 49th pctT-#25 / 69 · 53rd pctT-#7 / 17 · 53rd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 92nd pctT-#1 / 69 · 93rd pctT-#1 / 17 · 91st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Sacks (def)
Team
31.5/gmT-#80 / 138 · 33rd pctT-#49 / 69 · 22nd pctT-#10 / 17 · 32nd pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 97th pctT-#1 / 69 · 96th pct#1 / 17 · 97th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
Tackles for loss
Team
63.0/gmT-#122 / 138 · 9th pctT-#65 / 69 · 5th pctT-#16 / 17 · 6th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
31.5/gmT-#3 / 138 · 97th pctT-#2 / 69 · 95th pctT-#1 / 17 · 94th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
First downs
Team
6934.5/gm#2 / 138 · 99th pct#2 / 69 · 98th pct#1 / 17 · 97th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
2110.5/gmT-#9 / 138 · 93rd pctT-#8 / 69 · 88th pctT-#2 / 17 · 88th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down conv
Team
94.5/gmT-#85 / 138 · 32nd pctT-#50 / 69 · 24th pct#13 / 17 · 26th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
63.0/gmT-#12 / 138 · 86th pctT-#10 / 69 · 80th pctT-#3 / 17 · 82nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down att
Team
147.0/gm#137 / 138 · 1st pct#68 / 69 · 2nd pct#17 / 17 · 3rd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
2914.5/gmT-#79 / 138 · 40th pctT-#41 / 69 · 39th pct#9 / 17 · 50th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down conv
Team
00.0/gmT-#114 / 138 · 9th pctT-#52 / 69 · 13th pctT-#11 / 17 · 21st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 91st pctT-#1 / 69 · 90th pctT-#1 / 17 · 91st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down att
Team
10.5/gmT-#119 / 138 · 9th pctT-#55 / 69 · 14th pctT-#12 / 17 · 21st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#20 / 138 · 74th pctT-#10 / 69 · 72nd pctT-#3 / 17 · 71st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Time of possession
Team
73:3436:47/gm#13 / 138 · 91st pct#3 / 69 · 96th pct#1 / 17 · 97th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
46:2623:13/gm#4 / 138 · 97th pct#3 / 69 · 96th pct#1 / 17 · 97th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats — 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
+1.11 EPA/play10241 / 4591.1653
#12 FBS
14.58
#3 FBS
0271.797.9
5211 / 1384.617113.23
#60 FBS
1255.978.2
Running Backs
Player#GCarYdsAvgTDLongStuff%10+%
+0.26 EPA/play4220145
#72 FBS
7.22
#43 FBS
46
Receivers
Player#GRecYdsAvgTDLong
Deep Threat · +1.42 EPA/play1216330
#3 FBS
20.64
#5 FBS
52
+0.89 EPA/play18268313.82
#24 FBS
34

2026 stat leaders · Miami

through 2 games

Malachi Toney leads Miami with 330 receiving yards through 2 games.

1. Malachi Toney WR 330 receiving yards
2. Darian Mensah QB 653 passing yards
3. Javian Mallory RB 173 rushing yards
4. Marquise Lightfoot DL 11 tackles
5. Mark Fletcher Jr. RB 145 rushing yards
How They Play · 2025

Miami fields a strong methodical, ball-control offense behind an elite defense.

Offense
75th pct EPA/play
Tempo
82nd pct success, 10th explosiveness
Defense
94th pct EPA allowed

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

The Savant Card · Miami · 2025

Miami reads strongest in epa allowed (top 7%) and success rate allowed (top 9%); the crux lives in explosive plays, where Miami sits at the 9th percentile.

offense · strengths lead

EPA / play +0.22
75th
Success Rate +0.46
82nd
Explosive Plays +1.17
10th
Rushing EPA +0.10
47th

defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA Allowed +0.02
94th
Success Rate Allowed +0.35
92nd
Explosive Plays Allowed +1.25
58th
Passing EPA Allowed +0.13
86th

hidden math · special situations

Passing EPA +0.43
89th
Rushing EPA Allowed -0.02
89th
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 16 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 136 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · Miami · 2018–present · FBS opponents

Miami has had no measurable home edge — +0.9 points, home against road.

No measurable home edge, 4th percentile of 133 programs

69% at home, 59% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (31–14 home, 24–17 away). Interval ±4.1.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, Miami has beaten the number by −3.3 more at home than away over 73 games — inside the ±7.2 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

Hard Rock Stadium seats 64,767 and has averaged 88% full (57,209, 28 games reported). Visitors face the 11th-longest trip of 135 FBS venues: a median 698 miles since 2018. The map isn't translating, though — the split above still reads no measurable home edge. 23% of the 2026 roster (25 of 110 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 53 home games since 2018.

Home31–14Away24–17Edge+0.9 ±4.1Visitor trip698 mi

More in this tab

Tendency driftHow this coordinator's calls have drifted since arriving.

Season by season

How Miami’s current staff calls plays, year over year

Offense: Shannon Dawson (2023–2026)
1st-down pass rate
2023: 45% → 2026: 49% · 13-pt range · #60 of 184 · a typical amount
Red-zone pass rate
2023: 44% → 2026: 33% · 18-pt range · #46 of 182 · more than most
4th-down go rate
2023: 33% → 2025: 41% · 10-pt range · #140 of 172 · less than most
Defense: Corey Hetherman (2025–2026)
1st-down pass rate
2025: 41% → 2026: 49% · 7-pt range · #143 of 203 · a typical amount
Red-zone pass rate
2025: 38% → 2026: 33% · 5-pt range · #186 of 200 · less than most
RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Model Consensus

Where the Models Rank Miami

CFB Zeitgeist

#7

+11.2

SP+

#5

+24.7

FPI

#5

+25.7

Elo

#5

1930

The national models put Miami a consensus 5th nationally — CFB Zeitgeist is more skeptical, at 7th.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · Miami

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

Historical echoPrograms whose arc bent the same way -- then what happened.

Historical echo

Miami’s breakout has happened before — and 2 of the 4 closest programs couldn’t hold it.

Programs whose stature climbed in the same shape. The grey line is their run; the color is what came next for them.

Arizona State 1959–1964
kept climbing
Illinois 1947–1952
fell back
Tennessee 1947–1952
fell back
Auburn 2000–2005
held the gain

An analogy on the shape of a program’s Zeitgeist stature arc — not a prediction. Interim calibration, medium confidence; matched among current FBS programs at a comparable level.

ConditionsThe weather and altitude visitors have to deal with.
Venue texture

81°F average kickoff temp; 26% of games had measurable precipitation; 9 mph average wind.

Based on 80 home games with weather data.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site