Montana

6-3

Player stats

Player stats · 2026 season

No player stats logged for this program yet — stats appear once the season is underway.

How scary each game got

Montana lost at Northern Arizona after being 68% to win; the closest win was against Southern Utah, down to 39%

50%W1W1W2L3W4W5L6L7W9

Tap a game for its score and win chances.

Each bar runs from the lowest to the highest chance our model gave Montana during that game; the thick mark is where it started. Numbers are the game week.

Home-field advantage · 2018–present · FBS opponents

Montana is worth +13.2 points more at home than on the road.

Top tenth of FBS, 100th percentile of 133 programs

83% at home, 25% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (5-1 home, 2-6 away). Interval ±7.9.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest
95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest
The stadium and how the home edge is measured

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge. The books use about 3. Per-team versions were tested and did not hold up (why). Against the closing line, Montana has beaten the number by +2.5 more at home than away over 61 games. That is inside the ±8.6 that many games can resolve, so the results cannot tell this stadium from the flat number. That is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

Washington-Grizzly Stadium seats 25,217 and has averaged 101% full (25,415, 21 games reported). Visitors cover a median 697 miles to get here (2018-present).

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 59 home games since 2018. No national trip rank shown: the ranked field is FBS venues only and leaves out the service academies and venues with too few measured games.

Home5-1Away2-6Edge+13.2 ±7.9Visitor trip697 mi

More in this tab

Scheme claimsFive specific, testable claims about how this team plays.

How much of Montana’s number is the schedule?

Raw EPA/play through week 10 is 0.30; adjusted for opponent strength, it's 0.10. The widest gap came in week 2: 0.26 raw vs. 0.02 adjusted.

0.360.17-0.03Wk 2Wk 6Wk 10Raw EPA/playOpponent-adjusted
0.360.17-0.03Wk 2Wk 6Wk 10RawAdjusted
Source CFB Zeitgeist · season-to-date, opponent-adjusted model
Havoc & trenchesDefense havoc rate 0.152, 37th percentile

Disruption, run-blocking, and down-and-distance efficiency.

Havoc rate (D) 0.152
37th
Havoc allowed (O) 0.125
84th
Front-seven havoc (D) 0.095
47th
Secondary havoc (D) 0.056
41st
Stuff rate (D) 0.187
40th
Stuff rate allowed (O) 0.187
43rd
Line yards (O) 3.242
82nd
Line yards allowed (D) 2.948
37th
Standard-downs success (O) 0.574
99th
Standard-downs success allowed (D) 0.531
2nd
Passing-downs success (O) 0.309
46th
Passing-downs success allowed (D) 0.304
43rd
Screened 12 claims, 12 survived · 2026 season, FBS only, min. 3 games with data this season
Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · Montana

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. Text written by our model says so in a line beneath it, and it can get facts wrong. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site