Navy

1-1

American Athletic · Brian Newberry, year 4 (27-13) · Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium · 34,000 · 32,654 avg in 2026

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#74 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #55 (+3.6) · FPI #89
The marketno line yetat UAB · our model 37% Navy · a number, not a pick

LastL 30–38 at Florida Atlantic · Sat Sep 12 · Jackson Gutierrez 100 pass yds, 2 TD, 75 rush yds

Nextat UAB · Fri Sep 25 · 7 pm ET · Protective Stadium · series 3-0, won the last 3 · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

Key stats — 2026 — FBS rank
Points/game
36.0
Pts allowed/game
26.5
Total yards/gm#44 / 138 · 68th pct
460.0
Rush yards/gm#2 / 138 · 99th pct
376.0
Pass yards/gm#136 / 138 · 2nd pct
84.0
Yards allowed/gm#77 / 138 · 45th pct
337.0
Rush yds allowed/gm#6 / 138 · 96th pct
40.5
SacksT-#20 / 138 · 80th pct
6
3rd-down conv#62 / 138 · 55th pct
43.5%
All 86 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
920460.0/gm6.67/play#44 / 138 · 68th pct#30 / 70 · 58th pct#4 / 14 · 75th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
674337.0/gm5.81/play#77 / 138 · 45th pct#53 / 70 · 25th pct#4 / 14 · 75th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush yards
Team
752376.0/gm5.45/play#2 / 138 · 99th pct#1 / 70 · 99th pct#2 / 14 · 89th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
8140.5/gm0.70/play#6 / 138 · 96th pct#6 / 70 · 92nd pct#1 / 14 · 96th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush carries
Team
10954.5/gm#6 / 138 · 96th pct#3 / 70 · 96th pct#1 / 14 · 96th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
6432.0/gmT-#45 / 138 · 66th pctT-#31 / 70 · 55th pctT-#2 / 14 · 86th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush TDs
Team
84.0/gmT-#9 / 138 · 91st pctT-#6 / 70 · 88th pct#2 / 14 · 89th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 92nd pctT-#1 / 70 · 87th pctT-#1 / 14 · 93rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Net pass yards
Team
16884.0/gm1.22/play#136 / 138 · 2nd pct#70 / 70 · 1st pct#13 / 14 · 11th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
593296.5/gm5.11/play#126 / 138 · 9th pct#68 / 70 · 4th pct#13 / 14 · 11th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass attempts
Team
2914.5/gm#133 / 138 · 4th pct#68 / 70 · 4th pct#12 / 14 · 18th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
5226.0/gmT-#38 / 138 · 72nd pctT-#24 / 70 · 65th pct#5 / 14 · 68th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Completions
Team
126.0/gmT-#136 / 138 · 1st pct#70 / 70 · 1st pctT-#13 / 14 · 7th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
4120.5/gmT-#95 / 138 · 29th pctT-#53 / 70 · 23rd pctT-#10 / 14 · 29th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass TDs
Team
21.0/gmT-#94 / 138 · 25th pctT-#54 / 70 · 19th pctT-#6 / 14 · 46th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
73.5/gmT-#134 / 138 · 2nd pctT-#69 / 70 · 1st pct#14 / 14 · 4th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Passer rating allowed#91 / 91 · 1st pct#42 / 42 · 1st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
215.2215.2
Interceptions thrown
Team
10.5/gmT-#52 / 138 · 49th pctT-#25 / 70 · 53rd pctT-#6 / 14 · 50th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 92nd pctT-#1 / 70 · 92nd pctT-#1 / 14 · 86th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Sacks (def)
Team
63.0/gmT-#20 / 138 · 80th pctT-#11 / 70 · 78th pct#3 / 14 · 82nd pct#10 / 11 · 18th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#33 / 138 · 67th pctT-#20 / 70 · 61st pctT-#5 / 14 · 61st pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
Tackles for loss
Team
147.0/gmT-#29 / 138 · 73rd pctT-#18 / 70 · 68th pctT-#3 / 14 · 79th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
94.5/gmT-#55 / 138 · 57th pctT-#36 / 70 · 45th pctT-#4 / 14 · 71st pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
First downs
Team
4824.0/gmT-#46 / 138 · 65th pctT-#31 / 70 · 54th pct#4 / 14 · 75th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
4020.0/gmT-#90 / 138 · 34th pctT-#57 / 70 · 18th pctT-#6 / 14 · 57th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down conv
Team
105.0/gmT-#71 / 138 · 44th pctT-#42 / 70 · 35th pctT-#7 / 14 · 50th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
105.0/gmT-#66 / 138 · 48th pctT-#42 / 70 · 35th pctT-#6 / 14 · 57th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down att
Team
2311.5/gmT-#91 / 138 · 30th pctT-#43 / 70 · 34th pct#12 / 14 · 18th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
2211.0/gmT-#13 / 138 · 89th pctT-#4 / 70 · 94th pct#4 / 14 · 75th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down conv
Team
52.5/gmT-#4 / 138 · 95th pctT-#3 / 70 · 94th pctT-#1 / 14 · 86th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#26 / 138 · 66th pctT-#15 / 70 · 61st pctT-#1 / 14 · 75th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down att
Team
63.0/gmT-#16 / 138 · 85th pctT-#8 / 70 · 86th pct#4 / 14 · 75th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
31.5/gmT-#54 / 138 · 52nd pctT-#30 / 70 · 49th pctT-#4 / 14 · 71st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Time of possession
Team
66:0033:00/gm#41 / 138 · 71st pct#18 / 70 · 75th pct#7 / 14 · 54th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
54:0027:00/gm#32 / 138 · 77th pct#18 / 70 · 75th pct#6 / 14 · 61st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats — 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
+0.45 EPA/play826 / 12501008.320175.085.7
+0.35 EPA/play526 / 1735.36840157.145.4

2026 stat leaders · Navy

through 2 games

Braxton Woodson leads Navy with 296 rushing yards through 2 games.

1. Braxton Woodson QB 296 rushing yards
2. MarcAnthony Parker LB 18 tackles
3. Coleman Cauley LB 13 tackles
4. Giuseppe Sessi S 11 tackles
5. Christian Johnson LB 11 tackles
How They Play · 2025

Navy fields an elite run-heavy offense behind a porous, gives up the big play defense.

Offense
89th pct EPA/play
Run/Pass
77% run plays
Defense
22nd pct EPA allowed
Defensive shape
6th pct at limiting explosive plays

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

The Savant Card · Navy · 2025

Navy reads strongest in rushing epa (top 2%) and success rate (top 7%); the crux lives in explosive plays allowed, where Navy sits at the 5th percentile.

offense · strengths lead

EPA / play +0.30
89th
Success Rate +0.49
93rd
Explosive Plays +1.27
56th
Rushing EPA +0.29
98th

defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA Allowed +0.20
22nd
Success Rate Allowed +0.39
65th
Explosive Plays Allowed +1.40
6th
Passing EPA Allowed +0.40
13th

hidden math · special situations

Passing EPA +0.43
90th
Rushing EPA Allowed +0.10
43rd
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 13 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 136 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · Navy · 2018–present · FBS opponents

Navy is worth +1.6 points more at home than on the road.

Bottom third of FBS, 11th percentile of 133 programs

56% at home, 44% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (22–17 home, 18–23 away). Interval ±4.3.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, Navy has beaten the number by +1.8 more at home than away over 64 games — inside the ±8.0 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium seats 34,000 and has averaged 93% full (31,652, 22 games reported). Visitors cover a median 788 miles to get here (2018-present). 15% of the 2026 roster (27 of 186 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 45 home games since 2018. No national trip rank shown: the ranked field is FBS venues only and leaves out the service academies and venues with too few measured games. Service-academy rosters are filled by congressional nomination rather than ordinary recruiting and run well past normal FBS size — read the local share against that.

Home22–17Away18–23Edge+1.6 ±4.3Visitor trip788 mi

More in this tab

Scheme claimsFive specific, testable claims about how this team plays.

Standard downs vs. passing downs

Does Navy hold up once the down-and-distance turns against them?

98th percentile success on standard downs, 59th on passing downs — a 39-point gap between the two.

Fragile off scheduleBalanced, both workStruggles even on scheduleStandard-downs reliantNavyWeak on standard downsElite on standard downsFalls apart off scheduleHolds up off scheduleHawai'i18th standard · 41st passingUNLV51st standard · 7th passingStanford76th standard · 15th passingEastern Michigan52nd standard · 10th passingSan José State54th standard · 22nd passingNew Mexico State45th standard · 75th passingSacramento State23rd standard · 14th passingOklahoma State41st standard · 49th passingDuke20th standard · 29th passingFlorida State28th standard · 65th passingRutgers30th standard · 71st passingKansas70th standard · 35th passingBoston College27th standard · 56th passingNorfolk State16th standard · 9th passingLouisville96th standard · 70th passingMissouri36th standard · 85th passingMemphis69th standard · 65th passingGeorgia Southern24th standard · 45th passingOle Miss94th standard · 50th passingJacksonville State65th standard · 82nd passingNorth Dakota State86th standard · 27th passingArizona92nd standard · 86th passingUSC97th standard · 99th passingWake Forest56th standard · 97th passingTCU93rd standard · 8th passingDelaware70th standard · 31st passingUAB65th standard · 81st passingMichigan State62nd standard · 29th passingSouth Florida91st standard · 52nd passingFlorida International46th standard · 43rd passingNavy98th standard · 59th passingWisconsin13th standard · 18th passingOregon State10th standard · 38th passingSyracuse48th standard · 64th passingOhio State90th standard · 40th passingBall State12th standard · 24th passingPittsburgh30th standard · 76th passingColorado35th standard · 77th passingGeorgia Tech58th standard · 44th passingAuburn75th standard · 55th passingBaylor40th standard · 96th passingNorth Texas49th standard · 68th passingApp State44th standard · 90th passingIowa State4th standard · 23rd passingUTSA99th standard · 29th passingArkansas60th standard · 80th passingBoise State58th standard · 46th passingOregon35th standard · 33rd passingTulsa56th standard · 1st passingTulane31st standard · 2nd passingPurdue83rd standard · 88th passingMiddle Tennessee87th standard · 68th passingVanderbilt80th standard · 12th passingSan Diego State4th standard · 40th passingLSU33rd standard · 98th passingClemson1st standard · 19th passingCentral Michigan16th standard · 6th passingTexas Tech88th standard · 48th passingMichigan2nd standard · 62nd passingWestern Michigan39th standard · 20th passingOhio38th standard · 17th passingBuffalo7th standard · 14th passingTexas72nd standard · 94th passingCoastal Carolina61st standard · 52nd passingColorado State82nd standard · 91st passingWyoming65th standard · 36th passingTexas A&M85th standard · 72nd passingLiberty14th standard · 59th passingFlorida Atlantic43rd standard · 87th passingLouisiana19th standard · 92nd passingSouth Alabama50th standard · 73rd passingTroy22nd standard · 59th passingSam Houston78th standard · 61st passingNevada77th standard · 52nd passingWestern Kentucky25th standard · 34th passingWashington State8th standard · 3rd passingWashington81st standard · 4th passingCalifornia9th standard · 25th passingCharlotte73rd standard · 83rd passingTennessee65th standard · 78th passingUtah State4th standard · 93rd passing
Source CFB Zeitgeist · advanced team stats, Connelly success-rate definition
View all FBS teams as a table
TeamStandard-downs percentilePassing-downs percentile
App State44th90th
Arizona92nd86th
Arkansas60th80th
Auburn75th55th
Ball State12th24th
Baylor40th96th
Boise State58th46th
Boston College27th56th
Buffalo7th14th
California9th25th
Central Michigan16th6th
Charlotte73rd83rd
Clemson1st19th
Coastal Carolina61st52nd
Colorado35th77th
Colorado State82nd91st
Delaware70th31st
Duke20th29th
Eastern Michigan52nd10th
Florida Atlantic43rd87th
Florida International46th43rd
Florida State28th65th
Georgia Southern24th45th
Georgia Tech58th44th
Hawai'i18th41st
Iowa State4th23rd
Jacksonville State65th82nd
Kansas70th35th
LSU33rd98th
Liberty14th59th
Louisiana19th92nd
Louisville96th70th
Memphis69th65th
Michigan2nd62nd
Michigan State62nd29th
Middle Tennessee87th68th
Missouri36th85th
Navy98th59th
Nevada77th52nd
New Mexico State45th75th
Norfolk State16th9th
North Dakota State86th27th
North Texas49th68th
Ohio38th17th
Ohio State90th40th
Oklahoma State41st49th
Ole Miss94th50th
Oregon35th33rd
Oregon State10th38th
Pittsburgh30th76th
Purdue83rd88th
Rutgers30th71st
Sacramento State23rd14th
Sam Houston78th61st
San Diego State4th40th
San José State54th22nd
South Alabama50th73rd
South Florida91st52nd
Stanford76th15th
Syracuse48th64th
TCU93rd8th
Tennessee65th78th
Texas72nd94th
Texas A&M85th72nd
Texas Tech88th48th
Troy22nd59th
Tulane31st2nd
Tulsa56th1st
UAB65th81st
UNLV51st7th
USC97th99th
UTSA99th29th
Utah State4th93rd
Vanderbilt80th12th
Wake Forest56th97th
Washington81st4th
Washington State8th3rd
Western Kentucky25th34th
Western Michigan39th20th
Wisconsin13th18th
Wyoming65th36th
Tendency driftHow this coordinator's calls have drifted since arriving.

Season by season

How Navy’s current staff calls plays, year over year

Offense: Drew Cronic (2024–2026)
1st-down pass rate
2024: 20% → 2026: 16% · 4-pt range · #169 of 184 · less than most
Red-zone pass rate
2024: 12% → 2026: 0% · 18-pt range · #48 of 182 · a typical amount
4th-down go rate
2024: 38% → 2025: 50% · 12-pt range · #118 of 172 · a typical amount
RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Model Consensus

Where the Models Rank Navy

CFB Zeitgeist

#74

-0.4

SP+

#55

+3.6

FPI

#89

-5.3

Elo

#62

1513

The national models put Navy between 55th and 89th nationally — CFB Zeitgeist agrees, slotting them 74th.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · Navy

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

ConditionsThe weather and altitude visitors have to deal with.
Venue texture

65°F average kickoff temp; 7% of games had measurable precipitation; 8 mph average wind.

Based on 68 home games with weather data.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site