William & Mary

3-6

Player stats

Player stats · 2026 season

No player stats logged for this program yet — stats appear once the season is underway.

Biggest plays from William & Mary’s games

Official highlights with our numbers: the plays that moved the chance to win most in William & Mary’s games this season, whoever made them.

  1. Q1, 10:42 · Duke tiedWalker Eget finds Jayden Moore for a 24-yard touchdownWilliam & Mary at Duke, week 4Q1, 10:42 · Duke 7, William & Mary 0Duke opened the scoringDuke opened the scoringW.Eget pass complete deep left to J.Moore caught at WM00, for 24 yards to the WM00 touchdown, 1ST DOWN, kick goodWatch from this playESPN College Football
  2. Q1, 6:03 · Duke up 7Nate Sheppard runs 19 yards for a touchdownWilliam & Mary at Duke, week 4Q1, 6:03 · Duke 14, William & Mary 014-0score after the play14-0score after the playN.Sheppard rush left for 19 yards gain to the WM00 touchdown, 1ST DOWN, kick goodWatch from this playESPN College Football
  3. Q1, 2:58 · William & Mary down 14Winston Watkins finds Jack Reuter for a 6-yard touchdownWilliam & Mary at Duke, week 4Q1, 2:58 · William & Mary 7, Duke 14William & Mary answered right backWilliam & Mary answered right backW.Watkins pass complete short left to J.Reuter caught at DUKE06, for 6 yards to the DUKE00 touchdown, kick goodWatch from this playESPN College Football
  4. Q2, 10:42 · Duke up 10Dan Mahan finds Kavon Simmons for a 29-yard touchdownWilliam & Mary at Duke, week 4Q2, 10:42 · Duke 24, William & Mary 729Kavon Simmons's fourth touch of the season is a 29-yard touchdown29Kavon Simmons's fourth touch of the season is a 29-yard touchdownKavon Simmons's fourth touch of the season is a 29-yard touchdownD.Mahan pass complete deep middle to K.Simmons caught at WM05, for 29 yards to the WM00 touchdown, 1ST DOWN, kick goodWatch from this playESPN College Football
  5. Q2, 7:58 · Duke up 17Dan Mahan finds Jaivon Solomon for a 29-yard touchdownWilliam & Mary at Duke, week 4Q2, 7:58 · Duke 31, William & Mary 729Jaivon Solomon's third touch of the season is a 29-yard touchdown29Jaivon Solomon's third touch of the season is a 29-yard touchdownJaivon Solomon's third touch of the season is a 29-yard touchdownD.Mahan pass complete deep left to J.Solomon caught at WM09, for 29 yards to the WM00 touchdown, 1ST DOWN, kick goodWatch from this playESPN College Football
  6. Q2, 0:26 · Duke up 24Walker Eget finds Jared Richardson for a 28-yard touchdownWilliam & Mary at Duke, week 4Q2, 0:26 · Duke 38, William & Mary 795Capped a 95-yard drive95Capped a 95-yard driveCapped a 95-yard driveW.Eget pass complete deep left to J.Richardson caught at WM05, for 28 yards to the WM00 touchdown, 1ST DOWN, kick goodWatch from this playESPN College Football

All 11 plays from William & Mary’s games

How scary each game got

William & Mary lost to Georgetown after being 94% to win; the closest win was at Villanova, down to 4%

50%W1W1L2L3L4L5W6L8L9

Tap a game for its score and win chances.

Each bar runs from the lowest to the highest chance our model gave William & Mary during that game; the thick mark is where it started. Numbers are the game week.

Home-field advantage · 2018–present · FBS opponents

William & Mary is worth +9.1 points more at home than on the road.

Top tenth of FBS, 99th percentile of 133 programs

33% at home, 9% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (1-2 home, 1-10 away). Interval ±9.9.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest
95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest
The stadium and how the home edge is measured

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge. The books use about 3. Per-team versions were tested and did not hold up (why). Against the closing line, William & Mary has beaten the number by +1.6 more at home than away over 57 games. That is inside the ±8.3 that many games can resolve, so the results cannot tell this stadium from the flat number. That is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

Zable Stadium seats 12,400 and has averaged 81% full (10,015, 15 games reported). Visitors cover a median 205 miles to get here (2018-present).

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 42 home games since 2018. No national trip rank shown: the ranked field is FBS venues only and leaves out the service academies and venues with too few measured games.

Home1-2Away1-10Edge+9.1 ±9.9Visitor trip205 mi

More in this tab

Scheme claimsFive specific, testable claims about how this team plays.

How much of William & Mary’s number is the schedule?

Raw EPA/play through week 10 is −0.10; adjusted for opponent strength, it's −0.06. The widest gap came in week 2: −0.09 raw vs. −0.02 adjusted.

0.01-0.05-0.12Wk 2Wk 6Wk 10Raw EPA/playOpponent-adjusted
0.01-0.05-0.12Wk 2Wk 6Wk 10RawAdjusted
Source CFB Zeitgeist · season-to-date, opponent-adjusted model
Havoc & trenchesDefense havoc rate 0.125, 10th percentile

Disruption, run-blocking, and down-and-distance efficiency.

Havoc rate (D) 0.125
10th
Havoc allowed (O) 0.207
3rd
Front-seven havoc (D) 0.059
2nd
Secondary havoc (D) 0.065
62nd
Stuff rate (D) 0.144
8th
Stuff rate allowed (O) 0.254
3rd
Line yards (O) 2.299
1st
Line yards allowed (D) 3.480
3rd
Standard-downs success (O) 0.399
5th
Standard-downs success allowed (D) 0.537
2nd
Passing-downs success (O) 0.229
5th
Passing-downs success allowed (D) 0.380
5th
Screened 12 claims, 12 survived · 2026 season, FBS only, min. 3 games with data this season
Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · William & Mary

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. Text written by our model says so in a line beneath it, and it can get facts wrong. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site