CFB Zeitgeist Score
64
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by sacks at the 91st percentile.
Dayon Hayes
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
17 TACKLES · 3.5 SACKS
2026 Outlook
Returning to Texas A&M for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Projected starter
Defensive end · Texas A&M
Returning around him
- 75% of 2024 offensive production back (Strong continuity)
- 10 Texas A&M players drafted to NFL
- Transfer portal: -2 net (19 in / 21 out)
2026 Award watch
No preseason watch lists yet (most drop June 15 – July 15)
Texas A&M · Last season: 11-2 (AP #7) · Talent rank #8 · 2026 recruiting class #9
DE · TEXAS A&M · SEC
Dayon Hayes
- 4
- #50
- 6-3 | 264 lb
- Pittsburgh, PA
Heisman Heat
#6636
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP DEFENSE AWARD
Nagurski
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 1 · 2-deepR04 · Rotational
Rotational. Earning real snaps in the rotation.
Not on team2-deepStarterRecognizedEliteApex
Career Arc
HS
Recruit
★★★★
CFB
College
3 teams
NFL
NFL Draft
—
Identity & Role
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
Recruiting Pedigree
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 4-star | 0.9001 | No. 311 recruit | HighSchool | Pittsburgh |
Transfer Arc
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Heisman Lens · 2024 Season · Final
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
No achievements unlocked yet this season.
Selector Grid · 2025
AP—
FWAA—
AFCA—
WCFF—
SN—
SI—
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★★☆
to Pittsburgh
Composite
0.9001
#311 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
The Room on Dayon Hayes
Fan sentiment · Awaiting signal
The Room reads fan conversation around a player — who’s talking, what they believe, and how that shifts. It publishes once weekly volume rebuilds; for most players that’s in-season, when game-week chatter spikes.
Cohort divergence map
Cohort divergence reads how different fanbases talk about this player. Returns once weekly mentions clear the publish floor.
Rival Radar
How rival fanbases talk about Dayon Hayes
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
Signature Story
Awaiting candidate metric
He hasn't written his page yet — we'll start filling it in when there are enough snaps to rank against his peers.
Signature Moment
No signature moment on the ledger yet.
Returns once this player puts together a multi-game body of work — single-game flashes alone don't clear the bar.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the defensive totals stand
Through 11g
17Tackles
4Tackles for loss
3.5Sacks
Per game
2Tackles
0.4Tackles for loss
0.3Sacks
Projected (13g)
20Tackles
4.7Tackles for loss
4.1Sacks
To hit 80-tackle season (currently 17): needs 31.5/game over remaining 2.
To hit 100-tackle season (currently 17): needs 41.5/game over remaining 2.
To hit 6-sack season (currently 3.5): needs 1.2/game over remaining 2.
To hit 10-sack season (currently 3.5): needs 3.2/game over remaining 2.
Why this is a rare defensive case
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Dayon Hayes is trying to climb the steepest award hill in college football: a defensive candidacy. The hook is the disruption profile on Texas A&M's defense, with 3.5 sacks, 4.0 tackles for loss, and -- interceptions through the current loaded season. For a defender, the question is never just production; it is whether elite disruption and team context can become nationally undeniable.
2025 Season · Final
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
DEF season snapshot
2025 season snapshot | final
2025 season snapshot | finalData: CFBD player stats + local Heisman modelPeer context: same position + same level
Player identity What kind of player is this?
30-second read
What kind of player is this?
High-disruption defender against FBS defenders.
2025 Season · Final
2025 season snapshot | final
Tackling & Disruption
TOT
17 55th
SOLO
12 62nd
TFL
4.0 85th
SACK
3.5 95th
QBH
6 94th
Coverage & Takeaways
PD
1 43rd
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 11 games
| Wk | Opp | TKL | SOLO | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 42-24vs UTSA | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 2 | W 44-22vs Utah State | 3 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | — | 0 | Season-high 3 tackles |
| Wk 3 | W 41-40@ Notre Dame | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 5 | W 16-10vs Auburn | 3 | 3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 7 | W 34-17vs Florida | 2 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 8 | W 45-42@ Arkansas | 2 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 9 | W 49-25@ LSU | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 1 | |
| Wk 11 | W 38-17@ Missouri | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 12 | W 31-30vs South Carolina | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 13 | W 48-0vs Samford | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 14 | L 17-27@ Texas | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Total | 17 | 12 | 4.0 | 3.5 | — | 1 |
Season-by-season tables Career rows + per-season box score
Traditional history
Traditional Stats
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
2021Pittsburgh11-2HC: Pat Narduzzi · Balanced, fast tempo
2022Pittsburgh9-4HC: Pat Narduzzi · Run-leaning
2023Pittsburgh3-9HC: Pat Narduzzi · Balanced, slow tempo
2024Colorado9-4HC: Deion Sanders · Pass-leaning
2025Texas A&M11-2HC: Mike Elko · Run-leaning
| Season | Team | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Texas A&M | 17 | 12 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 1 | -- | -- |
| 2024 | Colorado | 16 | 10 | 3.5 | 2.0 | -- | -- | -- |
| 2023 | Pittsburgh | 45 | 25 | 10.5 | 4.0 | 4 | -- | -- |
| 2022 | Pittsburgh | 13 | 9 | 4.5 | 3.5 | -- | -- | -- |
| 2021 | Pittsburgh | 16 | 9 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 1 | -- | -- |
| Career | 5 loaded seasons | 107 | 65 | 31.5 | 16.0 | 6 | -- | -- |
Advanced layer Usage, value, and context
Advanced metrics second
Advanced Metrics
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
TFL, sacks, and QB hurries are grouped together because defensive Heisman cases are usually built on visible havoc, not on tackle counts alone.
Pass breakups, interceptions, and forced fumbles matter because national awards voters respond to plays that change possessions and highlight reels.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
Open full stat explorer
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defense | Total tackles | 17 | #2235/4942 | 55th pct | Volumevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | TFL | 4.0 | #738/4972 | 85th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Sacks | 3.5 | #233/4972 | 95th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Pass breakups | 1 | #1241/2184 | 43rd pct | Coveragevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | QB hurries | 6 | #117/1878 | 94th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Solo tackles | 12 | #1735/4584 | 62nd pct | Volumevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Fumbles recovered | 1 | #103/736 | 86th pct | Takeawaysvs FBS DEF |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 0 | #1/773 | 100th pct | Turnoversvs FBS DEF |
Player Standing
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
On-team2-deepStartingRecognizedEliteApex
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Status—Awaiting tracker
The Lombardi award tracker integrates per-week probability once a dedicated scraper for this award lands. Confirmed past winners and finalists for this player will surface here.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 11 games
Home vs Road
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home6g | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Road5g | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
Win vs Loss
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins10g | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Losses1g | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
First half vs Second half
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-75g | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the DE cohort
64Solid starter
Elite: qb hurries (94th). Strength: sacks (91st). Concern: tackles (23rd).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · DE · 2024
Percentile Card
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
P4G5All FBS
Advanced Savant
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Advanced opponent-adjusted metrics are coming soon for this player. Selected cohort: P4.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Dayon HayesTexas A&MAmare CampbellPenn State· 63% simMac HarrisSouth Florida· 63% simMarcAnthony ParkerNavy· 62% sim
QB hurries
Sacks
Tackles for loss
Passes defended
Forced fumbles
Solo tackles
Tackles
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
The Power Rusher
Bull-rushes through contact and sets a hard edge against the run.
EDGE
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Trey Schuman’s 2022 season.
Trey Schuman
86%match
#2
Cedric Johnson
NFL Rd 6
86%
#3
Zuriah Fisher
84%
#4
Jereme Robinson
82%
#5
Chris Murray
81%
Matches Trey on
Sack rate
Weight
TFL rate
Differs from Trey on
Class year (higher)
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Mike Elko
Pass share
45.8%
407 pass / 482 run
Plays / game
68.4
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
3.8%
286 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-leaning.
Coaching Lineage · 2021–2025
3 coaches2021
Jimbo Fisher
Texas A&M
2022
Jimbo Fisher
Texas A&M
2023era →
Elijah Robinson
Texas A&M
2024era →
Mike Elko
Texas A&M
2025
Mike Elko
Texas A&M
Played under 3 different head coaches: Jimbo Fisher, Elijah Robinson, and Mike Elko. Multi-era developmental context.
Bio · Recruiting · Transfer · Roster
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
HometownPittsburgh, PA
Height6'3"
Weight264 lb
Class4
PositionDE
Jersey50
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Current teamTexas A&M
ConferenceSEC
Joined2025
Career arc5 season(s)
Trophy Case · Detail
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
No formal honors on the ledger yet
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Honors Timeline
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Heisman By Year
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Colorado | DE4 | #6636 | #7085 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | Big 12 |
| 2023 | Pittsburgh | DE4 | #7012 | #8120 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W19 snapshot | ACC |
| 2022 | Pittsburgh | DE4 | #6237 | #6701 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | ACC |
| 2021 | Pittsburgh | DE4 | #4495 | #4925 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | ACC |
Roster Timeline
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Texas A&M | SEC | DE | 4 | No. 50 | 6-3 | 264 lb | Pittsburgh, PA |
| 2024 | Colorado | Big 12 | DE | 4 | No. 50 | 6-3 | 264 lb | Pittsburgh, PA |
| 2023 | Pittsburgh | ACC | DE | 4 | No. 50 | 6-3 | 264 lb | Pittsburgh, PA |
| 2022 | Pittsburgh | ACC | DE | 4 | No. 50 | 6-3 | 264 lb | Pittsburgh, PA |
| 2021 | Pittsburgh | ACC | DE | 4 | No. 50 | 6-3 | 264 lb | Pittsburgh, PA |