Cincinnati

2-0

Big 12 · Scott Satterfield, year 4 (17-22) · Nippert Stadium · 40,000 · 35,962 avg in 2026

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#100 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #47 (+5.9) · FPI #34
The marketCincinnati by 14.5vs Miami (OH) · our model 58% Cincinnati · a number, not a pick

LastW 62–10 vs Western Carolina · Sat Sep 12 · JC French 245 pass yds, 2 TD, 52 rush yds

Nextvs Miami (OH) · Sat Sep 19 · 3:30 pm ET · TQL Stadium · Cincinnati by 14.5 · series 35-34-1 · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

Key stats — 2026 — FBS rank
Points/game
48.0
Pts allowed/game
12.5
Total yards/gm#30 / 138 · 79th pct
514.5
Rush yards/gm#4 / 138 · 97th pct
336.0
Pass yards/gm#105 / 138 · 24th pct
178.5
Yards allowed/gm#62 / 138 · 55th pct
314.5
Rush yds allowed/gmT-#70 / 138 · 49th pct
119.5
SacksT-#60 / 138 · 50th pct
4
InterceptionsT-#29 / 115 · 61st pct
2
3rd-down conv#15 / 138 · 89th pct
56.5%
All 84 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
1029514.5/gm7.30/play#30 / 138 · 79th pct#20 / 69 · 72nd pct#5 / 16 · 72nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
629314.5/gm4.84/play#62 / 138 · 55th pct#45 / 69 · 36th pct#12 / 16 · 28th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush yards
Team
672336.0/gm4.77/play#4 / 138 · 97th pct#2 / 69 · 98th pct#1 / 16 · 97th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
239119.5/gm1.84/playT-#70 / 138 · 49th pct#50 / 69 · 28th pct#16 / 16 · 3rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush carries
Team
9547.5/gmT-#17 / 138 · 88th pctT-#4 / 69 · 94th pct#2 / 16 · 91st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
5829.0/gmT-#25 / 138 · 81st pctT-#19 / 69 · 72nd pct#6 / 16 · 66th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush TDs
Team
105.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 99th pctT-#1 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 16 · 97th pct#12 / 13 · 15th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#53 / 138 · 50th pctT-#34 / 69 · 36th pctT-#8 / 16 · 31st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Net pass yards
Team
357178.5/gm2.53/play#105 / 138 · 24th pct#61 / 69 · 12th pct#14 / 16 · 16th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
390195.0/gm3.00/play#64 / 138 · 54th pct#40 / 69 · 43rd pct#8 / 16 · 53rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass attempts
Team
4623.0/gmT-#112 / 138 · 18th pct#62 / 69 · 11th pct#14 / 16 · 16th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
7236.0/gmT-#108 / 138 · 21st pctT-#55 / 69 · 20th pct#13 / 16 · 22nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Completions
Team
3919.5/gmT-#67 / 138 · 51st pctT-#40 / 69 · 42nd pct#9 / 16 · 47th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
4221.0/gmT-#102 / 138 · 25th pct#56 / 69 · 20th pct#14 / 16 · 16th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass TDs
Team
31.5/gmT-#72 / 138 · 41st pctT-#44 / 69 · 30th pctT-#11 / 16 · 19th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#13 / 138 · 80th pctT-#11 / 69 · 72nd pctT-#4 / 16 · 66th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Passer rating#32 / 115 · 73rd pct#23 / 59 · 62nd pct#6 / 14 · 61st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
162.8162.8
Interceptions thrown
Team
00.0/gmT-#92 / 138 · 17th pctT-#42 / 69 · 20th pctT-#11 / 16 · 19th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#77 / 138 · 33rd pctT-#40 / 69 · 29th pctT-#11 / 16 · 25th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Sacks (def)
Team
42.0/gmT-#60 / 138 · 50th pctT-#36 / 69 · 40th pctT-#11 / 16 · 22nd pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#9 / 138 · 86th pctT-#6 / 69 · 83rd pctT-#2 / 16 · 78th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
Tackles for loss
Team
105.0/gmT-#79 / 138 · 38th pctT-#45 / 69 · 31st pctT-#12 / 16 · 25th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
94.5/gmT-#55 / 138 · 57th pctT-#36 / 69 · 45th pct#12 / 16 · 28th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
First downs
Team
4924.5/gmT-#39 / 138 · 70th pctT-#25 / 69 · 61st pct#7 / 16 · 59th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3718.5/gmT-#73 / 138 · 45th pctT-#48 / 69 · 28th pct#14 / 16 · 16th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down conv
Team
136.5/gmT-#37 / 138 · 68th pctT-#19 / 69 · 67th pctT-#6 / 16 · 56th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
63.0/gmT-#12 / 138 · 86th pctT-#10 / 69 · 80th pctT-#3 / 16 · 75th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down att
Team
2311.5/gmT-#91 / 138 · 30th pctT-#43 / 69 · 34th pctT-#9 / 16 · 41st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
2512.5/gmT-#33 / 138 · 73rd pctT-#14 / 69 · 76th pctT-#2 / 16 · 78th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down conv
Team
21.0/gmT-#51 / 138 · 51st pctT-#28 / 69 · 49th pctT-#7 / 16 · 50th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#71 / 138 · 37th pctT-#40 / 69 · 32nd pctT-#10 / 16 · 25th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down att
Team
31.5/gmT-#66 / 138 · 41st pctT-#35 / 69 · 43rd pctT-#8 / 16 · 47th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
63.0/gmT-#112 / 138 · 14th pctT-#59 / 69 · 10th pctT-#14 / 16 · 9th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Time of possession
Team
61:1830:39/gm#72 / 138 · 48th pct#34 / 69 · 51st pct#11 / 16 · 34th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
58:4229:21/gm#62 / 138 · 55th pct#34 / 69 · 51st pct#11 / 16 · 34th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats — 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
+0.49 EPA/play4231 / 3881.63228.53
#60 FBS
0178.8
Running Backs
Player#GCarYdsAvgTDLongStuff%10+%
+0.48 EPA/play6226210
#20 FBS
8.12
#43 FBS
40
Receivers
Player#GRecYdsAvgTDLong
+0.99 EPA/play112913314.82
#24 FBS
50
-0.47 EPA/play26193.209

2026 stat leaders · Cincinnati

through 2 games

Jonathan Thompson leads Cincinnati with 14 tackles through 2 games.

1. Jonathan Thompson LB 14 tackles
2. Antwan Peek Jr. LB 14 tackles
3. Gi'Bran Payne RB 210 rushing yards
4. Simeon Coleman LB 13 tackles
5. JaVonnie Gibson WR 133 receiving yards
How They Play · 2025

Cincinnati fields an elite offense behind a leaky, bend-don't-break defense.

Offense
89th pct EPA/play
Defense
28th pct EPA allowed
Defensive shape
93rd pct at limiting explosive plays

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

The Savant Card · Cincinnati · 2025

Cincinnati reads strongest in explosive plays allowed (top 7%) and rushing epa (top 11%); the crux lives in success rate allowed, where Cincinnati sits at the 25th percentile.

offense · strengths lead

EPA / play +0.30
89th
Success Rate +0.47
88th
Explosive Plays +1.35
83rd
Rushing EPA +0.23
89th

defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA Allowed +0.19
28th
Success Rate Allowed +0.44
25th
Explosive Plays Allowed +1.14
93rd
Passing EPA Allowed +0.26
44th

hidden math · special situations

Passing EPA +0.43
86th
Rushing EPA Allowed +0.13
30th
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 13 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 136 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · Cincinnati · 2018–present · FBS opponents

Cincinnati is worth +5.6 points more at home than on the road.

Top third of FBS, 74th percentile of 133 programs

74% at home, 61% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (35–12 home, 25–16 away). Interval ±4.0.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, Cincinnati has beaten the number by +2.2 more at home than away over 71 games — inside the ±7.0 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

Nippert Stadium seats 40,000 and has averaged 93% full (37,143, 28 games reported). Visitors face the 17th-longest trip of 135 FBS venues: a median 651 miles since 2018. Some of what the band above measures is the map, not the crowd. 21% of the 2026 roster (23 of 107 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 54 home games since 2018.

Home35–12Away25–16Edge+5.6 ±4.0Visitor trip651 mi

More in this tab

RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Model Consensus

Where the Models Rank Cincinnati

CFB Zeitgeist

#100

-3.4

SP+

#47

+5.9

FPI

#34

+8.6

Elo

#60

1516

The national models put Cincinnati between 34th and 60th nationally — CFB Zeitgeist is more skeptical, at 100th.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · Cincinnati

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

Historical echoPrograms whose arc bent the same way -- then what happened.

Historical echo

Cincinnati’s slide has precedent — and 3 of the 4 closest kept falling.

Programs whose stature fell in the same shape. The grey line is their decline; the color is what came next for them.

Purdue 1980–1985
kept sliding
Utah State 1967–1972
kept sliding
Nebraska 1987–1992
clawed back
SMU 1985–1992
kept sliding

An analogy on the shape of a program’s Zeitgeist stature arc — not a prediction. Interim calibration, medium confidence; matched among current FBS programs at a comparable level.

ConditionsThe weather and altitude visitors have to deal with.
Venue texture

63°F average kickoff temp; 8% of games had measurable precipitation; 7 mph average wind.

Based on 80 home games with weather data.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site