Georgia Tech

2-6

Next game: vs Louisville

Louisville’s best edge on Georgia Tech is running

Each unit against the one it meets, by national percentile this season. A filled dot is the attack and a ring is the defense it meets; the first name is the attack. Further right is better for both.

Georgia Tech offense against Louisville defense

weakelite
PassingGeorgia Tech 42nd · Louisville 25th
RunningGeorgia Tech 56th · Louisville 75th
Staying on scheduleGeorgia Tech 42nd · Louisville 65th
Big playsGeorgia Tech 73rd · Louisville 21st
Red zoneGeorgia Tech 26th · Louisville 63rd

Louisville offense against Georgia Tech defense

weakelite
PassingLouisville 88th · Georgia Tech 33rd
RunningLouisville 97th · Georgia Tech 12th
Staying on scheduleLouisville 92nd · Georgia Tech 21st
Big playsLouisville 97th · Georgia Tech 56th
Red zoneLouisville 76th · Georgia Tech 29th

Percentiles are against all FBS teams this season.

Key stats

Key stats · 2026 · FBS rank

Each bar is the team’s national rank as a percentile. A longer bar is better, for defense too.

EPA / play76th of 138
+0.11
EPA allowed / play120th of 138
+0.19
Kick ret yds2nd of 138
738
Kick returns3rd of 138
27
Penalty yds (opp)136th of 138
648
3rd-down conv136th of 138
30
Points / game91st of 138
24.8
All 98 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
2889361.1/gm5.65/play97th of 13856th of 6914th of 1713th of 13
Opp
3314414.2/gm5.87/play112th of 13862nd of 6914th of 171st of 13
Rush yards
Team
959119.9/gm1.88/play118th of 13859th of 6915th of 1713th of 13
Opp
1754219.2/gm3.10/play132nd of 13868th of 6916th of 173rd of 13
Rush carries
Team
24230.2/gm128th of 13865th of 6916th of 1713th of 13
Opp
35444.2/gm134th of 13869th of 6917th of 171st of 13
Rush TDs
Team
111.4/gmTied 90th of 138Tied 49th of 69Tied 12th of 1713th of 13
Opp
162.0/gmTied 115th of 138Tied 64th of 69Tied 14th of 173rd of 13
Net pass yards
Team
1930241.2/gm3.78/play57th of 13838th of 6912th of 177th of 13
Opp
1560195.0/gm2.76/play37th of 13821st of 694th of 171st of 13
Pass attempts
Team
26933.6/gmTied 39th of 138Tied 19th of 69Tied 6th of 177th of 13
Opp
21126.4/gmTied 19th of 1387th of 691st of 171st of 13
Completions
Team
18222.8/gmTied 24th of 138Tied 14th of 69Tied 7th of 176th of 13
Opp
11914.9/gmTied 9th of 138Tied 5th of 691st of 171st of 13
Pass TDs
Team
111.4/gmTied 86th of 138Tied 54th of 6915th of 179th of 13
Opp
121.5/gmTied 74th of 138Tied 41st of 699th of 171st of 13
Passer rating
Team
139.9139.959th of 13840th of 6912th of 176th of 13
Opp
131.6131.665th of 13736th of 697th of 176th of 13
Interceptions thrown
Team
60.8/gmTied 64th of 138Tied 34th of 69Tied 11th of 174th of 13
Opp
20.2/gmTied 127th of 138Tied 61st of 69Tied 14th of 1713th of 13
Sacks (def)
Team
121.5/gmTied 104th of 138Tied 58th of 69Tied 15th of 1711th of 11
Opp
202.5/gmTied 107th of 138Tied 51st of 6912th of 176th of 11
Tackles for loss
Team
465.8/gmTied 53rd of 138Tied 32nd of 6911th of 1711th of 11
Opp
475.9/gmTied 99th of 138Tied 50th of 69Tied 10th of 171st of 11
First downs
Team
16821.0/gmTied 67th of 13842nd of 6912th of 1713th of 13
Opp
18322.9/gmTied 125th of 13864th of 6915th of 171st of 13
3rd-down conv
Team
303.8/gm136th of 13869th of 6917th of 1713th of 13
Opp
486.0/gmTied 109th of 138Tied 58th of 6914th of 172nd of 13
3rd-down att
Team
9812.2/gmTied 113th of 138Tied 58th of 6914th of 1713th of 13
Opp
11414.2/gmTied 84th of 138Tied 39th of 699th of 171st of 13
4th-down conv
Team
70.9/gmTied 78th of 138Tied 38th of 69Tied 12th of 1712th of 13
Opp
111.4/gmTied 108th of 138Tied 57th of 69Tied 12th of 176th of 13
4th-down att
Team
172.1/gmTied 41st of 138Tied 18th of 69Tied 7th of 1710th of 13
Opp
141.8/gmTied 55th of 138Tied 29th of 695th of 172nd of 13
Time of possession
Team
218:2827:18/gm132nd of 13867th of 6916th of 1713th of 13
Opp
261:3232:42/gm117th of 13864th of 6915th of 171st of 13

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats · 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
Game Manager · +0.15 EPA/play158169 / 24070.41795
#44 FBS
7.510
#72 FBS
6142.05252.76.16.6
+0.19 EPA/play9313 / 2748.1135510102.4—82.7——
Running backs
Player#GCarYdsAvgTDLongStuff%10+%
Balanced Back · +0.08 EPA/play227112548
#64 FBS
4.944620.412.0
Power Back · +0.20 EPA/play17482896.0560——
Receivers
Player#GRecYdsAvgTDLong
Slot Technician · +0.81 EPA/play4846543
#61 FBS
11.8143
Possession Receiver · +0.74 EPA/play782843415.5246
Complete TE · +0.17 EPA/play868352988.5123
Complete TE · +0.36 EPA/play176131219.3018
+0.81 EPA/play16569415.7337
+0.27 EPA/play13578912.7019
-0.11 EPA/play8477711024

Biggest plays from Georgia Tech’s games

Official highlights with our numbers: the plays that moved the chance to win most in Georgia Tech’s games this season, whoever made them.

  1. Q4, 0:37 · Colorado down 6, takes the leadJulian Lewis finds Charlie Williams for a 20-yard touchdownColorado at Georgia Tech, week 1Q4, 0:37 · Colorado 14, Georgia Tech 130:37Go-ahead touchdown for Colorado with 0:37 left0:37Go-ahead touchdown for Colorado with 0:37 leftGo-ahead touchdown for Colorado with 0:37 leftJ.Lewis pass complete short left to C.Williams caught at GT 20, for 20 yards to the GT 00 touchdown, 1ST DOWN, kick goodWatch from this playESPN College Football
  2. Q2, 12:52 · Georgia Tech down 1, ties itRahkeem Smith returns the kickoff 100 yards for a touchdownColorado at Georgia Tech, week 1Q2, 12:52 · Georgia Tech 7, Colorado 7100Kickoff return touchdown100Kickoff return touchdownKickoff return touchdownRahkeem Smith 100 yd Kickoff Return (Aidan Birr Kick)Watch from this playESPN College Football
  3. Q3, 7:08 · Stanford down 7, ties itDavis Warren finds Caden High for a 49-yard touchdownGeorgia Tech at Stanford, week 4Q3, 7:08 · Stanford 20, Georgia Tech 20▲24%Stanford’s chance to win, 27% to 51%▲24%Stanford’s chance to win, 27% to 51%Caden High 49 yd pass from Davis Warren (Emmet Kenney Kick)Watch from this playESPN College Football
  4. Q2, 11:24 · Tennessee breaks the tieDejuan Lane takes an interception 41 yards for a pick-sixTennessee at Georgia Tech, week 2Q2, 11:24 · Tennessee 17, Georgia Tech 1041Pick-six41Pick-sixPick-sixA.Mendoza pass intercepted by D.Lane at GT 41 D.Lane return 41 yards to the GT 00 touchdown, kick goodWatch from this playESPN College Football
  5. Q2, 13:06 · Colorado tiedMicah Welch runs 5 yards for a touchdownColorado at Georgia Tech, week 1Q2, 13:06 · Colorado 7, Georgia Tech 0Colorado opened the scoringColorado opened the scoringM.Welch rush left for 5 yards gain to the GT 00 touchdown, kick goodWatch from this playESPN College Football
  6. Q4, 2:40 · Duke down 3, takes the leadNate Sheppard runs 5 yards for a touchdownDuke at Georgia Tech, week 6Q4, 2:40 · Duke 25, Georgia Tech 212:40Go-ahead touchdown for Duke with 2:40 left2:40Go-ahead touchdown for Duke with 2:40 leftGo-ahead touchdown for Duke with 2:40 leftN.Sheppard rush right for 5 yards gain to the GT 00 touchdown, 1ST DOWN, kick goodWatch from this playESPN College Football

All 62 plays from Georgia Tech’s games

How scary each game got

Georgia Tech lost to Colorado after being 96% to win; the closest win was against Duke, down to 16%

50%L1L2W3L4W6L7L8L9

Tap a game for its score and win chances.

Each bar runs from the lowest to the highest chance our model gave Georgia Tech during that game; the thick mark is where it started. Numbers are the game week.

Stat leaders

2026 stat leaders · Georgia Tech

through 8 games

Tae Harris leads Georgia Tech with 50 tackles through 8 games.

1. Tae Harris S 50 tackles
2. Jordan Allen WR 543 receiving yards
3. Taje Mccoy DE 45 tackles
4. Alberto Mendoza QB 1,795 passing yards
5. Tawfiq Thomas DT 42 tackles

Roster

Roster

2026
20 players carry a qualified CFB Zeitgeist Score this season so far.
Tawfiq Thomas IDL #3 of 300
Jordan Allen WR #53 of 465
Kevin Roche Jr. TE #21 of 132
Trelain Maddox RB #80 of 330
Dalen Penson WR #124 of 465
Tae Harris S #148 of 537

+14 more

Recruiting and the portal: top commits · who's gone and who's back

How they play

How they play · 2026

Georgia Tech fields a capable pass-first, explosive, big-play offense behind a porous defense.

Offense
45th pct EPA/play
Run/Pass
51% pass plays
Style
73rd pct explosiveness
Defense
13th pct EPA allowed

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

Player percentiles

Player percentiles · Georgia Tech · 2026

Georgia Tech reads strongest in explosive plays (top 28%) and rushing EPA (top 44%); the crux lives in rushing EPA allowed, where Georgia Tech sits at the 11th percentile.

Offense · strengths lead

EPA / play +0.11
45th
Success rate +0.42
42nd
Explosive plays +1.31
73rd
Rushing EPA +0.08
56th
Red-zone finish +3.26
26th

Defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA allowed +0.19
13th
Success rate allowed +0.43
21st
Explosive plays allowed +1.22
56th
Passing EPA allowed +0.23
33rd
Red-zone defense +3.80
29th

Hidden math · special situations

Field position (O) +28.31
30th
Passing EPA +0.20
42nd
Rushing EPA allowed +0.15
12th
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 8 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 138 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · 2018–present · FBS opponents

Georgia Tech has had no measurable home edge: −0.1 points, home against road.

No measurable home edge, 2nd percentile of 133 programs

44% at home, 39% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (20-25 home, 17-27 away). Interval ±4.1.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest
95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest
The stadium and how the home edge is measured

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge. The books use about 3. Per-team versions were tested and did not hold up (why). Against the closing line, Georgia Tech has beaten the number by 7.7 points less at home than away over 96 games. That is outside the ±6.1 that many games can resolve, so this is one of the few buildings where the results say something the flat number does not.

Bobby Dodd Stadium seats 55,000 and has averaged 75% full (41,331, 27 games reported). Visitors cover a median 351 miles to get here since 2018 — 53rd-shortest of 135 FBS venues, inside the ordinary range. For the home side it is genuinely home ground: 51% of the 2026 roster (56 of 109 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 52 home games since 2018.

Home20-25Away17-27Edge−0.1 ±4.1Visitor trip351 mi

More in this tab

How they play

Usage splitsWho gets the ball late, on money downs and as an underdog.

How the players get used

From the 2025 season's play-by-play

  • Deep threatEric Rivers is a real deep-ball threat: a high share of his targets come on throws past the sticks.
  • Deep threatIsiah Canion is a real deep-ball threat: a high share of his targets come on throws past the sticks.
  • Deep threatJordan Allen is used almost exclusively underneath: a low share of his targets are downfield shots.
Position battlesReps are split — here's who's actually winning them.

RB room

The carries are split. The job isn’t.

Justice Haynes and Trelain Maddox split the carries (108/154 vs 46/154) -- but Trelain Maddox leads on every measured axis. This isn't a split role, it's a hierarchy with a change-of-pace back behind it.

Justice HaynesTrelain Maddox
Carries
10846
the baseline -- every row below is tested against this split, not a flat 50/50
Targets
15/3520/35
p = 0.001 -- real, not noise
Top-5-carry share
28.7%54.0%
concentration and EPA/carry agree -- a real boom/bust split
Screened 2 claims, 2 survived

WR/TE room

The targets are split. The job isn’t.

Jordan Allen (WR) and Kevin Roche Jr. (TE) split the targets (55/109 vs 54/109) -- but the job isn't split the same way.

Jordan AllenKevin Roche Jr.
Targets
5554
the baseline -- every row below is tested against this split, not a flat 50/50
3rd-down targets
11/2817/28
shared -- dots touch, this room really is a committee here
Garbage-time share
6/159/15
shared -- dots touch, this room really is a committee here
Top-5-catch share
27.6%31.3%
concentration alone -- EPA/target doesn't corroborate, read with caution
Screened 3 claims, 0 survived, 3 falsified
Scheme claimsFive specific, testable claims about how this team plays.

Team identity · competitive snaps only

How Georgia Tech actually scores

30th percentile quality, 70th percentile boom-dependency. Garbage time excluded from both axes — the same correction that changes the Q4 story below.

Boom-dependent, below-averageBoom-dependent, eliteGrinding, below-averageConsistent, eliteGeorgia TechBelow-average offenseElite offenseSustained-drive builtExplosive-play dependentMemphis87th quality · 20th boom-shareGeorgia Southern52nd quality · 40th boom-shareOle Miss80th quality · 8th boom-shareDelaware63rd quality · 40th boom-shareJacksonville State62nd quality · 41st boom-shareNorth Dakota State31st quality · 64th boom-shareFlorida State64th quality · 44th boom-shareUCF19th quality · 82nd boom-shareArizona91st quality · 16th boom-shareUtah96th quality · 7th boom-shareStanford53rd quality · 55th boom-shareMiami100th quality · 0th boom-shareUSC80th quality · 12th boom-shareFresno State56th quality · 52nd boom-shareNorth Carolina48th quality · 45th boom-shareTCU21st quality · 75th boom-shareUAB16th quality · 81st boom-shareIllinois70th quality · 38th boom-shareWake Forest98th quality · 4th boom-shareAkron9th quality · 90th boom-shareToledo84th quality · 24th boom-shareRice18th quality · 87th boom-shareTemple56th quality · 56th boom-shareSouth Florida42nd quality · 56th boom-shareFlorida International2nd quality · 98th boom-shareMinnesota4th quality · 95th boom-shareNavy57th quality · 51st boom-shareNC State69th quality · 28th boom-shareVirginia51st quality · 39th boom-shareSan José State13th quality · 84th boom-shareMassachusetts38th quality · 60th boom-shareRutgers32nd quality · 76th boom-shareUNLV44th quality · 67th boom-shareKennesaw State23rd quality · 79th boom-shareWisconsin22nd quality · 84th boom-shareEastern Michigan14th quality · 80th boom-shareNotre Dame97th quality · 5th boom-shareHouston89th quality · 2nd boom-shareOregon State92nd quality · 13th boom-shareSyracuse24th quality · 74th boom-shareSouth Carolina55th quality · 54th boom-shareOhio State79th quality · 23rd boom-shareBall State32nd quality · 72nd boom-shareMiami (OH)68th quality · 31st boom-sharePittsburgh44th quality · 50th boom-shareKansas28th quality · 66th boom-shareIowa State43rd quality · 62nd boom-shareBoston College20th quality · 80th boom-shareCincinnati88th quality · 15th boom-shareIndiana85th quality · 18th boom-shareNorth Texas99th quality · 1st boom-shareColorado15th quality · 86th boom-shareGeorgia Tech30th quality · 70th boom-shareBoise State96th quality · 4th boom-shareOregon28th quality · 72nd boom-shareGeorgia State77th quality · 36th boom-shareAuburn34th quality · 59th boom-shareBaylor36th quality · 63rd boom-shareApp State41st quality · 48th boom-shareUTSA72nd quality · 20th boom-shareArkansas7th quality · 93rd boom-shareIowa52nd quality · 53rd boom-shareNorthern Illinois12th quality · 89th boom-shareTulsa68th quality · 28th boom-shareOklahoma State76th quality · 14th boom-shareDuke74th quality · 8th boom-shareTulane33rd quality · 73rd boom-shareSouthern Miss3rd quality · 97th boom-shareUConn84th quality · 26th boom-shareVanderbilt26th quality · 76th boom-shareAlabama82nd quality · 22nd boom-shareEast Carolina24th quality · 77th boom-sharePurdue65th quality · 34th boom-shareKansas State48th quality · 44th boom-shareVirginia Tech66th quality · 33rd boom-shareNorthwestern93rd quality · 6th boom-shareMiddle Tennessee37th quality · 60th boom-shareArizona State20th quality · 83rd boom-shareLSU86th quality · 9th boom-shareClemson10th quality · 92nd boom-shareBYU83rd quality · 17th boom-shareSan Diego State5th quality · 94th boom-shareNew Mexico39th quality · 68th boom-shareCentral Michigan6th quality · 96th boom-shareHawai'i12th quality · 88th boom-shareTexas Tech50th quality · 46th boom-shareMaryland17th quality · 85th boom-shareMichigan25th quality · 71st boom-shareWestern Michigan29th quality · 68th boom-shareOhio67th quality · 43rd boom-shareNebraska59th quality · 32nd boom-sharePenn State47th quality · 48th boom-shareMarshall36th quality · 61st boom-shareLouisville94th quality · 19th boom-shareArkansas State60th quality · 32nd boom-shareArmy95th quality · 10th boom-shareMissouri54th quality · 49th boom-shareBuffalo8th quality · 88th boom-shareLiberty78th quality · 29th boom-shareJames Madison58th quality · 35th boom-shareSMU81st quality · 16th boom-shareTexas State90th quality · 12th boom-shareTexas11th quality · 91st boom-shareMissouri State40th quality · 64th boom-shareTexas A&M16th quality · 78th boom-shareNevada1st quality · 99th boom-shareWest Virginia73rd quality · 24th boom-shareCoastal Carolina49th quality · 57th boom-shareWestern Kentucky4th quality · 96th boom-shareMississippi State35th quality · 65th boom-shareColorado State88th quality · 30th boom-shareWyoming46th quality · 52nd boom-shareSouth Alabama64th quality · 27th boom-shareLouisiana Tech60th quality · 47th boom-shareLouisiana27th quality · 69th boom-shareWashington40th quality · 58th boom-shareTroy8th quality · 92nd boom-shareFlorida Atlantic72nd quality · 25th boom-shareFlorida75th quality · 37th boom-shareUCLA61st quality · 36th boom-shareKentucky71st quality · 21st boom-shareGeorgia92nd quality · 11th boom-shareAir Force76th quality · 3rd boom-shareTennessee45th quality · 42nd boom-shareUtah State0th quality · 100th boom-share
Boom-reliant, weakBoom-reliant, eliteGrinding, weakConsistent, eliteGeorgia TechBelow-average offenseElite offenseSustained-drive builtExplosive-play dependentMemphis87th quality · 20th boom-shareGeorgia Southern52nd quality · 40th boom-shareOle Miss80th quality · 8th boom-shareDelaware63rd quality · 40th boom-shareJacksonville State62nd quality · 41st boom-shareNorth Dakota State31st quality · 64th boom-shareFlorida State64th quality · 44th boom-shareUCF19th quality · 82nd boom-shareArizona91st quality · 16th boom-shareUtah96th quality · 7th boom-shareStanford53rd quality · 55th boom-shareMiami100th quality · 0th boom-shareUSC80th quality · 12th boom-shareFresno State56th quality · 52nd boom-shareNorth Carolina48th quality · 45th boom-shareTCU21st quality · 75th boom-shareUAB16th quality · 81st boom-shareIllinois70th quality · 38th boom-shareWake Forest98th quality · 4th boom-shareAkron9th quality · 90th boom-shareToledo84th quality · 24th boom-shareRice18th quality · 87th boom-shareTemple56th quality · 56th boom-shareSouth Florida42nd quality · 56th boom-shareFlorida International2nd quality · 98th boom-shareMinnesota4th quality · 95th boom-shareNavy57th quality · 51st boom-shareNC State69th quality · 28th boom-shareVirginia51st quality · 39th boom-shareSan José State13th quality · 84th boom-shareMassachusetts38th quality · 60th boom-shareRutgers32nd quality · 76th boom-shareUNLV44th quality · 67th boom-shareKennesaw State23rd quality · 79th boom-shareWisconsin22nd quality · 84th boom-shareEastern Michigan14th quality · 80th boom-shareNotre Dame97th quality · 5th boom-shareHouston89th quality · 2nd boom-shareOregon State92nd quality · 13th boom-shareSyracuse24th quality · 74th boom-shareSouth Carolina55th quality · 54th boom-shareOhio State79th quality · 23rd boom-shareBall State32nd quality · 72nd boom-shareMiami (OH)68th quality · 31st boom-sharePittsburgh44th quality · 50th boom-shareKansas28th quality · 66th boom-shareIowa State43rd quality · 62nd boom-shareBoston College20th quality · 80th boom-shareCincinnati88th quality · 15th boom-shareIndiana85th quality · 18th boom-shareNorth Texas99th quality · 1st boom-shareColorado15th quality · 86th boom-shareGeorgia Tech30th quality · 70th boom-shareBoise State96th quality · 4th boom-shareOregon28th quality · 72nd boom-shareGeorgia State77th quality · 36th boom-shareAuburn34th quality · 59th boom-shareBaylor36th quality · 63rd boom-shareApp State41st quality · 48th boom-shareUTSA72nd quality · 20th boom-shareArkansas7th quality · 93rd boom-shareIowa52nd quality · 53rd boom-shareNorthern Illinois12th quality · 89th boom-shareTulsa68th quality · 28th boom-shareOklahoma State76th quality · 14th boom-shareDuke74th quality · 8th boom-shareTulane33rd quality · 73rd boom-shareSouthern Miss3rd quality · 97th boom-shareUConn84th quality · 26th boom-shareVanderbilt26th quality · 76th boom-shareAlabama82nd quality · 22nd boom-shareEast Carolina24th quality · 77th boom-sharePurdue65th quality · 34th boom-shareKansas State48th quality · 44th boom-shareVirginia Tech66th quality · 33rd boom-shareNorthwestern93rd quality · 6th boom-shareMiddle Tennessee37th quality · 60th boom-shareArizona State20th quality · 83rd boom-shareLSU86th quality · 9th boom-shareClemson10th quality · 92nd boom-shareBYU83rd quality · 17th boom-shareSan Diego State5th quality · 94th boom-shareNew Mexico39th quality · 68th boom-shareCentral Michigan6th quality · 96th boom-shareHawai'i12th quality · 88th boom-shareTexas Tech50th quality · 46th boom-shareMaryland17th quality · 85th boom-shareMichigan25th quality · 71st boom-shareWestern Michigan29th quality · 68th boom-shareOhio67th quality · 43rd boom-shareNebraska59th quality · 32nd boom-sharePenn State47th quality · 48th boom-shareMarshall36th quality · 61st boom-shareLouisville94th quality · 19th boom-shareArkansas State60th quality · 32nd boom-shareArmy95th quality · 10th boom-shareMissouri54th quality · 49th boom-shareBuffalo8th quality · 88th boom-shareLiberty78th quality · 29th boom-shareJames Madison58th quality · 35th boom-shareSMU81st quality · 16th boom-shareTexas State90th quality · 12th boom-shareTexas11th quality · 91st boom-shareMissouri State40th quality · 64th boom-shareTexas A&M16th quality · 78th boom-shareNevada1st quality · 99th boom-shareWest Virginia73rd quality · 24th boom-shareCoastal Carolina49th quality · 57th boom-shareWestern Kentucky4th quality · 96th boom-shareMississippi State35th quality · 65th boom-shareColorado State88th quality · 30th boom-shareWyoming46th quality · 52nd boom-shareSouth Alabama64th quality · 27th boom-shareLouisiana Tech60th quality · 47th boom-shareLouisiana27th quality · 69th boom-shareWashington40th quality · 58th boom-shareTroy8th quality · 92nd boom-shareFlorida Atlantic72nd quality · 25th boom-shareFlorida75th quality · 37th boom-shareUCLA61st quality · 36th boom-shareKentucky71st quality · 21st boom-shareGeorgia92nd quality · 11th boom-shareAir Force76th quality · 3rd boom-shareTennessee45th quality · 42nd boom-shareUtah State0th quality · 100th boom-share
Source CFB Zeitgeist · CFBD play-by-play, competitive snaps only
View all FBS teams as a table
TeamQuality percentileBoom-share percentile
Air Force76th3rd
Akron9th90th
Alabama82nd22nd
App State41st48th
Arizona91st16th
Arizona State20th83rd
Arkansas7th93rd
Arkansas State60th32nd
Army95th10th
Auburn34th59th
BYU83rd17th
Ball State32nd72nd
Baylor36th63rd
Boise State96th4th
Boston College20th80th
Buffalo8th88th
Central Michigan6th96th
Cincinnati88th15th
Clemson10th92nd
Coastal Carolina49th57th
Colorado15th86th
Colorado State88th30th
Delaware63rd40th
Duke74th8th
East Carolina24th77th
Eastern Michigan14th80th
Florida75th37th
Florida Atlantic72nd25th
Florida International2nd98th
Florida State64th44th
Fresno State56th52nd
Georgia92nd11th
Georgia Southern52nd40th
Georgia State77th36th
Georgia Tech30th70th
Hawai'i12th88th
Houston89th2nd
Illinois70th38th
Indiana85th18th
Iowa52nd53rd
Iowa State43rd62nd
Jacksonville State62nd41st
James Madison58th35th
Kansas28th66th
Kansas State48th44th
Kennesaw State23rd79th
Kentucky71st21st
LSU86th9th
Liberty78th29th
Louisiana27th69th
Louisiana Tech60th47th
Louisville94th19th
Marshall36th61st
Maryland17th85th
Massachusetts38th60th
Memphis87th20th
Miami100th0th
Miami (OH)68th31st
Michigan25th71st
Middle Tennessee37th60th
Minnesota4th95th
Mississippi State35th65th
Missouri54th49th
Missouri State40th64th
NC State69th28th
Navy57th51st
Nebraska59th32nd
Nevada1st99th
New Mexico39th68th
North Carolina48th45th
North Dakota State31st64th
North Texas99th1st
Northern Illinois12th89th
Northwestern93rd6th
Notre Dame97th5th
Ohio67th43rd
Ohio State79th23rd
Oklahoma State76th14th
Ole Miss80th8th
Oregon28th72nd
Oregon State92nd13th
Penn State47th48th
Pittsburgh44th50th
Purdue65th34th
Rice18th87th
Rutgers32nd76th
SMU81st16th
San Diego State5th94th
San José State13th84th
South Alabama64th27th
South Carolina55th54th
South Florida42nd56th
Southern Miss3rd97th
Stanford53rd55th
Syracuse24th74th
TCU21st75th
Temple56th56th
Tennessee45th42nd
Texas11th91st
Texas A&M16th78th
Texas State90th12th
Texas Tech50th46th
Toledo84th24th
Troy8th92nd
Tulane33rd73rd
Tulsa68th28th
UAB16th81st
UCF19th82nd
UCLA61st36th
UConn84th26th
UNLV44th67th
USC80th12th
UTSA72nd20th
Utah96th7th
Utah State0th100th
Vanderbilt26th76th
Virginia51st39th
Virginia Tech66th33rd
Wake Forest98th4th
Washington40th58th
West Virginia73rd24th
Western Kentucky4th96th
Western Michigan29th68th
Wisconsin22nd84th
Wyoming46th52nd

Georgia Tech’s 4th-quarter offense, before and after garbage time

Raw Q4 EPA/play ranks 27th percentile in FBS. Strip out snaps taken with a blowout margin and it drops to the 14th — the correction is the finding, not a footnote.

league medianRaw 4th quarter · 27th pctileCompetitive snap…Worst in FBSBest in FBS
Source CFB Zeitgeist · CFBD play-by-play, garbage-time adjusted by pre-play margin

Standard downs vs. passing downs

Does Georgia Tech hold up once the down-and-distance turns against them?

53rd percentile success on standard downs, 40th on passing downs — little dropoff between the two — a schedule-independent identity.

Fragile off scheduleBalanced, both workStruggles even on scheduleStandard-downs reliantGeorgia TechWeak on standard downsElite on standard downsFalls apart off scheduleHolds up off scheduleHawai'i48th standard · 29th passingUNLV41st standard · 19th passingStanford40th standard · 9th passingEastern Michigan16th standard · 30th passingSan José State17th standard · 2nd passingNew Mexico State14th standard · 36th passingSacramento State13th standard · 6th passingOklahoma State96th standard · 86th passingDuke21st standard · 67th passingFlorida State30th standard · 90th passingRutgers42nd standard · 81st passingKansas52nd standard · 18th passingBoston College63rd standard · 28th passingNorfolk State7th standard · 0th passingLouisville95th standard · 72nd passingMissouri34th standard · 41st passingMemphis92nd standard · 93rd passingGeorgia Southern60th standard · 71st passingOle Miss81st standard · 94th passingJacksonville State82nd standard · 80th passingNorth Dakota State30th standard · 45th passingArizona76th standard · 94th passingUSC79th standard · 97th passingWake Forest75th standard · 96th passingTCU70th standard · 10th passingDelaware59th standard · 64th passingUAB24th standard · 62nd passingMichigan State23rd standard · 55th passingSouth Florida84th standard · 57th passingFlorida International20th standard · 53rd passingNavy89th standard · 17th passingWisconsin25th standard · 22nd passingOregon State97th standard · 70th passingSyracuse57th standard · 39th passingOhio State84th standard · 80th passingBall State31st standard · 52nd passingPittsburgh65th standard · 50th passingColorado16th standard · 65th passingGeorgia Tech53rd standard · 40th passingAuburn14th standard · 69th passingBaylor15th standard · 46th passingNorth Texas95th standard · 84th passingApp State33rd standard · 49th passingIowa State18th standard · 31st passingUTSA91st standard · 33rd passingArkansas71st standard · 24th passingBoise State77th standard · 92nd passingOregon39th standard · 26th passingTulsa49th standard · 7th passingTulane12th standard · 8th passingPurdue57th standard · 82nd passingMiddle Tennessee27th standard · 64th passingVanderbilt41st standard · 32nd passingSan Diego State8th standard · 54th passingLSU86th standard · 98th passingClemson7th standard · 39th passingCentral Michigan36th standard · 9th passingTexas Tech64th standard · 76th passingMichigan10th standard · 89th passingWestern Michigan32nd standard · 27th passingOhio82nd standard · 42nd passingBuffalo9th standard · 11th passingTexas27th standard · 61st passingCoastal Carolina23rd standard · 64th passingColorado State66th standard · 95th passingWyoming78th standard · 48th passingTexas A&M46th standard · 55th passingLiberty93rd standard · 78th passingFlorida Atlantic67th standard · 87th passingLouisiana36th standard · 66th passingSouth Alabama44th standard · 74th passingTroy39th standard · 15th passingSam Houston11th standard · 37th passingNevada28th standard · 27th passingWestern Kentucky22nd standard · 25th passingWashington State19th standard · 5th passingWashington56th standard · 16th passingCalifornia11th standard · 20th passingCharlotte18th standard · 41st passingTennessee75th standard · 12th passingUtah State3rd standard · 76th passingMiami99th standard · 95th passingHouston87th standard · 99th passingUCF29th standard · 45th passingUtah94th standard · 98th passingFresno State25th standard · 84th passingAkron58th standard · 34th passingNorth Carolina89th standard · 73rd passingIllinois73rd standard · 91st passingToledo73rd standard · 52nd passingMinnesota32nd standard · 4th passingRice59th standard · 14th passingTemple50th standard · 68th passingNC State62nd standard · 77th passingVirginia83rd standard · 2nd passingNotre Dame100th standard · 43rd passingMassachusetts35th standard · 38th passingKent State5th standard · 21st passingSouth Carolina70th standard · 56th passingMiami (OH)50th standard · 43rd passingKennesaw State61st standard · 16th passingCincinnati68th standard · 83rd passingIndiana55th standard · 44th passingMaine0th standard · 86th passingNorthern Illinois51st standard · 14th passingBowling Green43rd standard · 21st passingGeorgia State68th standard · 66th passingSouthern Miss48th standard · 7th passingKansas State64th standard · 68th passingUConn72nd standard · 73rd passingAlabama77th standard · 57th passingEast Carolina37th standard · 19th passingOld Dominion1st standard · 36th passingOklahoma4th standard · 50th passingUTEP9th standard · 1st passingNorthwestern88th standard · 88th passingVirginia Tech43rd standard · 91st passingMaryland34th standard · 26th passingArizona State38th standard · 61st passingNew Mexico55th standard · 48th passingNebraska46th standard · 85th passingMarshall69th standard · 32nd passingArkansas State85th standard · 59th passingSMU91st standard · 82nd passingJames Madison45th standard · 77th passingTexas State74th standard · 100th passingMississippi State66th standard · 59th passingUL Monroe47th standard · 11th passingMissouri State52nd standard · 30th passingWest Virginia54th standard · 75th passingLouisiana Tech26th standard · 79th passingUCLA80th standard · 60th passingKentucky90th standard · 51st passingFlorida61st standard · 70th passingUT Martin6th standard · 3rd passingArmy93rd standard · 58th passingMercyhurst2nd standard · 34th passingIowa79th standard · 13th passingPenn State20th standard · 47th passingAir Force98th standard · 23rd passingRobert Morris2nd standard · 5th passingGardner-Webb5th standard · 23rd passingGeorgia98th standard · 89th passingBYU86th standard · 35th passing
Fragile off scheduleBalancedWeak both waysStandard downs onlyGeorgia TechWeak on standard downsElite on standard downsFalls apart off scheduleHolds up off scheduleHawai'i48th standard · 29th passingUNLV41st standard · 19th passingStanford40th standard · 9th passingEastern Michigan16th standard · 30th passingSan José State17th standard · 2nd passingNew Mexico State14th standard · 36th passingSacramento State13th standard · 6th passingOklahoma State96th standard · 86th passingDuke21st standard · 67th passingFlorida State30th standard · 90th passingRutgers42nd standard · 81st passingKansas52nd standard · 18th passingBoston College63rd standard · 28th passingNorfolk State7th standard · 0th passingLouisville95th standard · 72nd passingMissouri34th standard · 41st passingMemphis92nd standard · 93rd passingGeorgia Southern60th standard · 71st passingOle Miss81st standard · 94th passingJacksonville State82nd standard · 80th passingNorth Dakota State30th standard · 45th passingArizona76th standard · 94th passingUSC79th standard · 97th passingWake Forest75th standard · 96th passingTCU70th standard · 10th passingDelaware59th standard · 64th passingUAB24th standard · 62nd passingMichigan State23rd standard · 55th passingSouth Florida84th standard · 57th passingFlorida International20th standard · 53rd passingNavy89th standard · 17th passingWisconsin25th standard · 22nd passingOregon State97th standard · 70th passingSyracuse57th standard · 39th passingOhio State84th standard · 80th passingBall State31st standard · 52nd passingPittsburgh65th standard · 50th passingColorado16th standard · 65th passingGeorgia Tech53rd standard · 40th passingAuburn14th standard · 69th passingBaylor15th standard · 46th passingNorth Texas95th standard · 84th passingApp State33rd standard · 49th passingIowa State18th standard · 31st passingUTSA91st standard · 33rd passingArkansas71st standard · 24th passingBoise State77th standard · 92nd passingOregon39th standard · 26th passingTulsa49th standard · 7th passingTulane12th standard · 8th passingPurdue57th standard · 82nd passingMiddle Tennessee27th standard · 64th passingVanderbilt41st standard · 32nd passingSan Diego State8th standard · 54th passingLSU86th standard · 98th passingClemson7th standard · 39th passingCentral Michigan36th standard · 9th passingTexas Tech64th standard · 76th passingMichigan10th standard · 89th passingWestern Michigan32nd standard · 27th passingOhio82nd standard · 42nd passingBuffalo9th standard · 11th passingTexas27th standard · 61st passingCoastal Carolina23rd standard · 64th passingColorado State66th standard · 95th passingWyoming78th standard · 48th passingTexas A&M46th standard · 55th passingLiberty93rd standard · 78th passingFlorida Atlantic67th standard · 87th passingLouisiana36th standard · 66th passingSouth Alabama44th standard · 74th passingTroy39th standard · 15th passingSam Houston11th standard · 37th passingNevada28th standard · 27th passingWestern Kentucky22nd standard · 25th passingWashington State19th standard · 5th passingWashington56th standard · 16th passingCalifornia11th standard · 20th passingCharlotte18th standard · 41st passingTennessee75th standard · 12th passingUtah State3rd standard · 76th passingMiami99th standard · 95th passingHouston87th standard · 99th passingUCF29th standard · 45th passingUtah94th standard · 98th passingFresno State25th standard · 84th passingAkron58th standard · 34th passingNorth Carolina89th standard · 73rd passingIllinois73rd standard · 91st passingToledo73rd standard · 52nd passingMinnesota32nd standard · 4th passingRice59th standard · 14th passingTemple50th standard · 68th passingNC State62nd standard · 77th passingVirginia83rd standard · 2nd passingNotre Dame100th standard · 43rd passingMassachusetts35th standard · 38th passingKent State5th standard · 21st passingSouth Carolina70th standard · 56th passingMiami (OH)50th standard · 43rd passingKennesaw State61st standard · 16th passingCincinnati68th standard · 83rd passingIndiana55th standard · 44th passingMaine0th standard · 86th passingNorthern Illinois51st standard · 14th passingBowling Green43rd standard · 21st passingGeorgia State68th standard · 66th passingSouthern Miss48th standard · 7th passingKansas State64th standard · 68th passingUConn72nd standard · 73rd passingAlabama77th standard · 57th passingEast Carolina37th standard · 19th passingOld Dominion1st standard · 36th passingOklahoma4th standard · 50th passingUTEP9th standard · 1st passingNorthwestern88th standard · 88th passingVirginia Tech43rd standard · 91st passingMaryland34th standard · 26th passingArizona State38th standard · 61st passingNew Mexico55th standard · 48th passingNebraska46th standard · 85th passingMarshall69th standard · 32nd passingArkansas State85th standard · 59th passingSMU91st standard · 82nd passingJames Madison45th standard · 77th passingTexas State74th standard · 100th passingMississippi State66th standard · 59th passingUL Monroe47th standard · 11th passingMissouri State52nd standard · 30th passingWest Virginia54th standard · 75th passingLouisiana Tech26th standard · 79th passingUCLA80th standard · 60th passingKentucky90th standard · 51st passingFlorida61st standard · 70th passingUT Martin6th standard · 3rd passingArmy93rd standard · 58th passingMercyhurst2nd standard · 34th passingIowa79th standard · 13th passingPenn State20th standard · 47th passingAir Force98th standard · 23rd passingRobert Morris2nd standard · 5th passingGardner-Webb5th standard · 23rd passingGeorgia98th standard · 89th passingBYU86th standard · 35th passing
Source CFB Zeitgeist · advanced team stats, Connelly success-rate definition
View all FBS teams as a table
TeamStandard-downs percentilePassing-downs percentile
Air Force98th23rd
Akron58th34th
Alabama77th57th
App State33rd49th
Arizona76th94th
Arizona State38th61st
Arkansas71st24th
Arkansas State85th59th
Army93rd58th
Auburn14th69th
BYU86th35th
Ball State31st52nd
Baylor15th46th
Boise State77th92nd
Boston College63rd28th
Bowling Green43rd21st
Buffalo9th11th
California11th20th
Central Michigan36th9th
Charlotte18th41st
Cincinnati68th83rd
Clemson7th39th
Coastal Carolina23rd64th
Colorado16th65th
Colorado State66th95th
Delaware59th64th
Duke21st67th
East Carolina37th19th
Eastern Michigan16th30th
Florida61st70th
Florida Atlantic67th87th
Florida International20th53rd
Florida State30th90th
Fresno State25th84th
Gardner-Webb5th23rd
Georgia98th89th
Georgia Southern60th71st
Georgia State68th66th
Georgia Tech53rd40th
Hawai'i48th29th
Houston87th99th
Illinois73rd91st
Indiana55th44th
Iowa79th13th
Iowa State18th31st
Jacksonville State82nd80th
James Madison45th77th
Kansas52nd18th
Kansas State64th68th
Kennesaw State61st16th
Kent State5th21st
Kentucky90th51st
LSU86th98th
Liberty93rd78th
Louisiana36th66th
Louisiana Tech26th79th
Louisville95th72nd
Maine0th86th
Marshall69th32nd
Maryland34th26th
Massachusetts35th38th
Memphis92nd93rd
Mercyhurst2nd34th
Miami99th95th
Miami (OH)50th43rd
Michigan10th89th
Michigan State23rd55th
Middle Tennessee27th64th
Minnesota32nd4th
Mississippi State66th59th
Missouri34th41st
Missouri State52nd30th
NC State62nd77th
Navy89th17th
Nebraska46th85th
Nevada28th27th
New Mexico55th48th
New Mexico State14th36th
Norfolk State7th0th
North Carolina89th73rd
North Dakota State30th45th
North Texas95th84th
Northern Illinois51st14th
Northwestern88th88th
Notre Dame100th43rd
Ohio82nd42nd
Ohio State84th80th
Oklahoma4th50th
Oklahoma State96th86th
Old Dominion1st36th
Ole Miss81st94th
Oregon39th26th
Oregon State97th70th
Penn State20th47th
Pittsburgh65th50th
Purdue57th82nd
Rice59th14th
Robert Morris2nd5th
Rutgers42nd81st
SMU91st82nd
Sacramento State13th6th
Sam Houston11th37th
San Diego State8th54th
San José State17th2nd
South Alabama44th74th
South Carolina70th56th
South Florida84th57th
Southern Miss48th7th
Stanford40th9th
Syracuse57th39th
TCU70th10th
Temple50th68th
Tennessee75th12th
Texas27th61st
Texas A&M46th55th
Texas State74th100th
Texas Tech64th76th
Toledo73rd52nd
Troy39th15th
Tulane12th8th
Tulsa49th7th
UAB24th62nd
UCF29th45th
UCLA80th60th
UConn72nd73rd
UL Monroe47th11th
UNLV41st19th
USC79th97th
UT Martin6th3rd
UTEP9th1st
UTSA91st33rd
Utah94th98th
Utah State3rd76th
Vanderbilt41st32nd
Virginia83rd2nd
Virginia Tech43rd91st
Wake Forest75th96th
Washington56th16th
Washington State19th5th
West Virginia54th75th
Western Kentucky22nd25th
Western Michigan32nd27th
Wisconsin25th22nd
Wyoming78th48th

Georgia Tech by half

1st-half offense ranks 28th percentile in FBS; 2nd-half, 71st — competitive snaps only, garbage time excluded from both halves.

league median1st half · 28th pctile2nd half · 71st pctileWorst in FBSBest in FBS
Source CFB Zeitgeist · advanced team stats, garbage-time adjusted by pre-play margin

How much of Georgia Tech’s number is the schedule?

Raw EPA/play through week 10 is 0.11; 45th percentile once opponent strength is stripped out, it's 0.03. The widest gap came in week 7: 0.18 raw vs. 0.04 adjusted.

0.230.09-0.06Wk 2Wk 6Wk 10Raw EPA/playOpponent-adjusted
0.230.09-0.06Wk 2Wk 6Wk 10RawAdjusted
Source CFB Zeitgeist · season-to-date, opponent-adjusted model
Pass defense by zoneThe part of the field opponents keep attacking.

What this team throws, and gives up, by depth.

On short throws (≤19 air yards), Georgia Tech’s passing game completes a completion rate above the FBS mean (69.0% vs 67.0% league-wide, shrunk toward the mean for its 241-play sample) — mid-pack, 102 of 136 qualifying offenses.

On short throws (≤19 air yards), Georgia Tech’s defense allows a completion rate below the FBS mean (63.3% vs 66.3% league-wide, shrunk toward the mean for its 161-play sample) — mid-pack, 11 of 137 qualifying defenses.

We won’t show a deep-ball (20+ air yards) leaderboard here, on either side of the ball: even a full season of charted plays gives most teams well under 30 deep attempts — too thin to tell a real tendency from noise, so we won’t guess. Same refusal for yards-after-catch allowed and where a team’s attempts land by zone: both measured and both came back statistically indistinguishable from season-to-season noise.

Screened 273 claims, 273 survived · 2025+ only, charted plays (parse_status='complete'); n=241 short-zone plays, raw rate 70.1%; 2025+ only, charted plays (parse_status='complete'); n=161 short-zone plays, raw rate 59.0%
Havoc & trenchesDefense havoc rate 0.138, 21th percentile

Disruption, run-blocking, and down-and-distance efficiency.

Havoc rate (D) 0.138
21st
Havoc allowed (O) 0.181
14th
Front-seven havoc (D) 0.100
56th
Secondary havoc (D) 0.038
3rd
Stuff rate (D) 0.160
18th
Stuff rate allowed (O) 0.213
18th
Line yards (O) 2.806
26th
Line yards allowed (D) 3.204
10th
Standard-downs success (O) 0.470
48th
Standard-downs success allowed (D) 0.457
46th
Passing-downs success (O) 0.281
25th
Passing-downs success allowed (D) 0.352
10th
Screened 12 claims, 12 survived · 2026 season, FBS only, min. 3 games with data this season
Turnover luckHow much of the margin was skill vs. the bounce.
Fumble luck

The bounces have gone their way on their own fumbles: 69% recovered, vs. ~52% expected.

11 of 16 own fumbles recovered themselves; 4 of 9 forced fumbles recovered, 2026 only.

TakeawaysWhat this defense does once it gets the ball.
Takeaway conversion

Deflections without payoff: 9% of disrupted passes intercepted, vs. ~18% league-wide.

2 interceptions of 23 disrupted passes (21 deflected, 2 intercepted), 2026 only.

PenaltiesWhether flags are costing this team games.
Penalty battle

The flags have favored them: 65 penalties drawn on opponents vs. 62 committed, 134 yards to the good.

514 penalty yards committed vs. 648 drawn on opponents, 2026 season total.

Ratings and comparisons

RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Where the models rank Georgia Tech

CFB Zeitgeist Score

#111

-3.3

SP+

#75

-1.1

FPI

#83

-3.8

Elo

#91

1374

SRS

#103

-8.5

The national models put Georgia Tech between 75th and 103rd nationally — CFB Zeitgeist is more skeptical, at 111th.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist Score ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · Georgia Tech

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

WeatherHow warm or cold its home and road games usually are.

Bobby Dodd Stadium, Atlanta, GA

Usual during the game around Nov 7: 58°, between 49° and 68° in about 7 in 10 games (30 games since 2016).

Road games since 2016: the middle game was 64°, and 8 in 10 ran between 44° and 80° (46 of 49 road games, at stadiums we cover).

HomeRoad

What a usual Saturday feels like here, by kickoff time

Airport readings near each stadium during the game, not on the field. How we measure

Weather observations: National Weather Service, through the Iowa Environmental Mesonet at Iowa State University. Rain: NOAA MRMS radar and CoCoRaHS volunteer gauges (CC BY 4.0). Game data: CollegeFootballData.com.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. Text written by our model says so in a line beneath it, and it can get facts wrong. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site