CFB Zeitgeist Score
48
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by passes defended at the 98th percentile.
Jimmy Wyrick
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
62 TACKLES · 0 SACKS
In Portal · 2026
In transfer portal
S · UTSA · AMERICAN ATHLETIC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
48
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by passes defended at the 98th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#12962
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP DB AWARD
Jim Thorpe
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3-star | 0.8704 | No. 683 recruit | HighSchool |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UTSA -> -- | 3-star | 0.8500 | Immediate |
| 2024 | Stanford -> UTSA | 3-star | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★☆☆
to —
Composite
0.8704
#683 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment · Awaiting signal
The Room reads fan conversation around a player — who’s talking, what they believe, and how that shifts. It publishes once weekly volume rebuilds; for most players that’s in-season, when game-week chatter spikes.
Cohort divergence reads how different fanbases talk about this player. Returns once weekly mentions clear the publish floor.
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
Signature Story
He hasn't written his page yet — we'll start filling it in when there are enough snaps to rank against his peers.
Signature Moment
No signature moment on the ledger yet.
Returns once this player puts together a multi-game body of work — single-game flashes alone don't clear the bar.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the defensive totals stand
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Jimmy Wyrick is trying to climb the steepest award hill in college football: a defensive candidacy. The hook is the disruption profile on UTSA's defense, with 0.0 sacks, 0.5 tackles for loss, and 1 interceptions through the current loaded season. For a defender, the question is never just production; it is whether elite disruption and team context can become nationally undeniable.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Coverage splash | High-volume tackler against FBS defenders.
2025 season snapshot | final
Tackling & Disruption
Coverage & Takeaways
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 13 games
| Wk | Opp | TKL | SOLO | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | L 24-42@ Texas A&M | 5 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 2 | L 36-43vs Texas State | 6 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 3 | W 48-20vs Incarnate Word | 4 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 4 | W 17-16@ Colorado State | 11 | 5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | — | 0 | Season-high 11 tackles |
| Wk 6 | L 21-27@ Temple | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 2 | |
| Wk 7 | W 61-13vs Rice | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 1 | |
| Wk 8 | L 17-55@ North Texas | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 2 | |
| Wk 10 | W 48-26vs Tulane | 7 | 5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 1 | |
| Wk 11 | L 23-55@ South Florida | 6 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 12 | W 28-7@ Charlotte | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 13 | W 58-24vs East Carolina | 4 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 1 | |
| Wk 14 | L 24-27vs Army | 9 | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 1 | |
| Bowl | W 57-20vs Florida International | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Total | 62 | 42 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1 | 8 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
TFL, sacks, and QB hurries are grouped together because defensive Heisman cases are usually built on visible havoc, not on tackle counts alone.
Pass breakups, interceptions, and forced fumbles matter because national awards voters respond to plays that change possessions and highlight reels.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defense | Total tackles | 62 | #373/4942 | 92nd pct | Volumevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | TFL | 0.5 | #2658/4972 | 47th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Sacks | 0.0 | #1762/4972 | 65th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Interceptions | 1 | #308/869 | 65th pct | Takeawaysvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Pass breakups | 8 | #45/2184 | 98th pct | Coveragevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Solo tackles | 42 | #165/4584 | 96th pct | Volumevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Fumbles recovered | 2 | #13/736 | 98th pct | Takeawaysvs FBS DEF |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 0 | #1/773 | 100th pct | Turnoversvs FBS DEF |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
The Thorpe award tracker integrates per-week probability once a dedicated scraper for this award lands. Confirmed past winners and finalists for this player will surface here.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 13 games
Home vs Road
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 4.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Road6g | 4.8 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.7 |
Win vs Loss
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins7g | 4.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Losses6g | 5.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 |
First half vs Second half
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-77g | 4.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 5.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the S cohort
Elite: passes defended (97th). Strength: solo tackles (94th). Concern: tackles for loss (18th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · S · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Lives near the line of scrimmage as a de facto extra linebacker.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Jonathan McGill’s 2022 season.
Jonathan McGill
Robert Kennedy
Mac McWilliams
C.J. Coldon
Brent Gordon Jr.
Matches Jonathan on
Differs from Jonathan on
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
As a graduate, his production profile tracks closest to Marcus Williams's graduate season at Rice (2025).
Marcus Williams
Jyron Gilmore
Jaheem Joseph
J'Dan Burnett
Isaac Walker
Matches Marcus on
Differs from Marcus on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Jeff Traylor
Pass share
50.7%
446 pass / 434 run
Plays / game
67.7
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
6.0%
281 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2021–2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Jeff Traylor.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | UTSA | S2 | #12962 | #13045 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | American Athletic |
| 2023 | Stanford | S2 | #15311 | #15453 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W19 snapshot | Pac-12 |
| 2022 | Stanford | S2 | #14173 | #14333 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | Pac-12 |
| 2021 | Stanford | S2 | #11199 | #11464 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | Pac-12 |
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | UTSA | American Athletic | S | 2 | No. 18 | 5-10 | 185 lb | Dallas, TX |
| 2024 | UTSA | American Athletic | S | 2 | No. 18 | 5-10 | 185 lb | Dallas, TX |
| 2023 | Stanford | Pac-12 | S | 2 | No. 18 | 5-10 | 185 lb | Dallas, TX |
| 2022 | Stanford | Pac-12 | S | 2 | No. 18 | 5-10 | 185 lb | Dallas, TX |
| 2021 | Stanford | Pac-12 | S | 2 | No. 18 | 5-10 | 185 lb | Dallas, TX |