ACC Stanford

Head coach Tavita Pritchard · 1st season · 4-5 at Stanford

Record4-52-4 ACC · T-12th
Bowl2 wins to goto bowl eligibility
NextByethen at Virginia Tech · Sat Nov 14

The rest of the season

Three real tests left: No. 24 SMU 10%, Virginia Tech 15%, California 47%

Win out 1% · expect 0.7 of 3 more wins

Stanford's chance to win each game left, from our model: Virginia Tech 15%, California 47%, SMU 10%

Bar height is our model’s chance in each game left. Dashed line: 50%.

StandingTied for 12th in the ACC · 2-4 in conference play · All standings

LeadersPassing Davis Warren 2,203 · Rushing Micah Ford 751 · Receiving Caden High 419 All player stats

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#122 CFB ZeitgeistPublic ratings: SP+ #112 (-10.8) · FPI #108
The marketno line yetBetting line at Virginia Tech · our model 15% Stanford

Updated Wed Nov 4 · through week 9

Follow Stanford:athletics siteACC

Schedule and results

Stanford · 2026 schedule and results4-5Brutal slateAverage opponent win rate 61% · 3 opponents played so far are in the AP top 25 now.Our rank entering each game: #97 to #130
WkDateOur rankOpp rankLineOpponentResultRecordConfTop performers
1Aug 29#97#59−4.5✓ +5.5Hawai'iW 37-27 145Stanford won 37-27 vs Hawai'i. Chance to win started at 71%, low 44%, high better than 99%. Loud1-00-0Pass Warren 310 · Rush Ford 99 · Rec Hall 81
1Sep 4#97#10+24.5✗ −14.5MiamiL 6-45 132Stanford lost 6-45 vs Miami. Chance to win started at 8%, low under 1%, high 19%.1-10-1Pass Warren 214 · Rush Irvin 41 · Rec High 92
2Bye week
3Sep 19#101#67+9.5✗ −18.5@DukeL 7-35 129Stanford lost 7-35 at Duke. Chance to win started at 15%, low under 1%, high 28%. Loud1-20-2Pass Warren 151 · Rush Ford 76 · Rec High 43
4Sep 26#106#98+3✓ +10Georgia TechW 34-27 144Stanford won 34-27 vs Georgia Tech. Chance to win started at 49%, low 16%, high 96%.2-21-2Pass Warren 396 · Rush Ford 55 · Rec Brown 98
5Oct 3#115#71+14.5✗ −39.5@Wake ForestL 3-57 134Stanford lost 3-57 at Wake Forest. Chance to win started at 12%, low under 1%, high 19%.2-31-3Pass Warren 136 · Rush Ford 45 · Rec Brown 42
6Oct 10#133#4+40.5✗ −10.5@Notre DameL 7-58 118Stanford lost 7-58 at Notre Dame. Never had a real chance.2-41-3Pass Warren 144 · Rush Ford 48 · Rec High 64
7Oct 17#140#203−33.5✗ −6.5ElonW 34-7 74Stanford won 34-7 vs Elon. Chance to win started at 98%, low 97%, high better than 99%.3-41-3Pass Warren 279 · Rush Ford 179 · Rec Hall 70
8Oct 23#133#63+7.5✓ +10.5NC StateW 31-28 134Stanford won 31-28 vs NC State. Chance to win started at 40%, low 38%, high better than 99%.4-42-3Pass Warren 303 · Rush Ford 150 · Rec High 103
9Oct 31#130#31+22.5✗ −5.5@LouisvilleL 24-52 131Stanford lost 24-52 at Louisville. Chance to win started at 5%, low under 1%, high 16%.4-52-4Pass Warren 270 · Rush Ford 72 · Rec Brown 109
10Bye week
11Nov 14#144#55@Virginia Techtime TBA15% to win
12Nov 21@Californiatime TBA47% to win
13Nov 28SMUtime TBA10% to win
How to read this table

Win chances are our model for Stanford, through 9 games. This week's game comes from the playoff simulation, later games from the rating model. They are estimates and move every week.

The small line beside each score is the team's win chance through the game, drawn on one scale for every game. The small number is total plays.

Line is the closing point spread for Stanford: a minus number means favored. A green check means the team covered it, by the number beside it. A red cross means it fell short by that much.

Advanced box score (EPA, success rate, big plays)▼
DateOppResultYdsTOTOPEPA/playSuccess%Big plays (IsoPPP)Note
Oct 31@LouisvilleL 24-52351230:42-0.17026.4%1.89Most explosive
Oct 23NC StateW 31-28477030:01+0.34145.1%1.47One-score win
Oct 17ElonW 34-7515132:49+0.40350.0%1.21Season-high EPA/play
Oct 10@Notre DameL 7-58202322:50-0.25925.0%1.20Season-low EPA/play
Oct 3@Wake ForestL 3-57197131:14-0.15232.9%0.97Blowout loss
Sep 26Georgia TechW 34-27482030:07+0.28042.5%1.56One-score win
Sep 19@DukeL 7-35237122:46-0.13335.0%1.06Blowout loss
Sep 4MiamiL 6-45299023:26+0.02033.3%1.06Blowout loss
Aug 29Hawai'iW 37-27483030:54+0.32645.2%1.21
Season average (9 games)3600.9+0.07337.3%1.29

Stanford's wildest games since 2013: comebacks, long shots, line misses

What’s ahead

The forecast
Season line3.5 winsover -167
Offense softPass-first, spreadExplosive, big-play

Season expectations

Win total1 bookOver/under 3.5
ACC title#16 in market+40,000

Sportsbook odds · Oct 19. A number with a minus is the favorite: −130 means $130 wins $100. A plus is the underdog: +170 means $100 wins $170.

Today’s games across college football

What fans said

What fans said

Real posts about each game (they name the opponent, a player or a play), chosen by community score · usernames not shown

The games that decide the season

The games that decide the season

Recent form · last 10 games

Stanford has won two of its last five.

4-6 over the last 10, and lost the last one.

Streak L1Last 5 · 2-3Last 10 · 4-6
It starts with me. The guys didn’t play well enough, which means I didn’t have them ready
Doeren · On3the day of Stanford's 2026 game against NC State
2 storylines developing

What Stanford’s coaching hire is really about

The open questioncan a new staff change the trajectory?

Coachingthis cyclenew

Tavita Pritchard inherits a 4-8 roster and a program that hasn't won a conference title since 2013 — the admissions office identity clashes with a rebuild demanding results, not just tradition.

What happenedTavita Pritchard took over as Stanford's head coach, replacing Frank Reich.
The contextthe program's third head coach in five seasons

Statusfront page

Governance shock2026-10-23new

Tavita Pritchard inherits a 4-8 losing record at Stanford, where power football has struggled to take root in an admissions office.

What happenedStanford lawsuit appeal expedited.

Statusdeveloping

How past storylines here turned out

ReplacedStanford moved on from that hire — a new coaching change began the following season. See who's next →
Died downStanford's defensive coordinator change has died down — no clear next chapter yet.

Written by our model from the storyline records. It can get facts wrong.

Range of outcomes · Stanford · 2026

Stanford’s most likely regular season is 5-7. 99% of outcomes land from 4-8 to 6-6.

Regular-season wins: chance of each total, from the game chances above

4 wins 40%; 5 wins 48%; 6 wins 11%
What a title game and a playoff run could add
Floor5-7No postseason.
Base7-6A bowl game.
Ceiling8-5A bowl game, 1 more win.

Bars are the chance of each regular-season win total, from our model's chance in each game left, through 9 games. Paler bars are the outer 10% at each end. The closed row comes from the season-path projection, which also plays out conference title games and the CFP.

How fans reactedreal posts and moves · tap to open
Following now · Stanford · Developing

Stanford lawsuit appeal expedited.

bullish, with real dissent doubt on the left, belief on the right · bigger dot, louder
Skeptics1 doubtful post
Believers10 upbeat posts
Fans: 19% volume · mostly neutral
The saga so far~3 months old
Sep 11Win total (line at 3.5) still unmoved 13d after "Hawaii star out for season opener"
Sep 10Win total (line at 3.5) still unmoved 12d after "Hawaii star out for season opener"
Sep 9Win total (line at 3.5) still unmoved 11d after "Hawaii star out for season opener"
Sep 8Win total (line at 3.5) still unmoved 10d after "Hawaii star out for season opener"
Sep 7Win total (line at 4.5) — no reprice yet on "Hawaii star out for season opener"
Our read
Tavita Pritchard inherits a 4-8 losing record at Stanford, where power football has struggled to take root in an admissions office.
How fans are reacting · tap to expand
Believers bullishSkeptics dissentThe Boards loud
📣Believers10 bullish items making the case that it's working.›

The optimistic read: momentum, and the 'this is real' takes.

“Stanford commit Braden Chaffin "couldn't pass up" Michigan visit”
On3 · Nov 2 · read ↗
“Stanford Wins Recruiting Battle, Lands Commitment from Four-Star QB Hunter Fujikawa”
Yahoo Sports · Nov 2 · read ↗
“2028 4-star QB Hunter Fujikawa commits to Stanford”
On3 · Nov 2 · read ↗
🧐SkepticsLeading counter: “Stanford falls to Louisville after disappointing second half”.›

The analytical counter: rankings, results, and 'the hype is ahead of the tape' takes.

“Stanford falls to Louisville after disappointing second half”
The Stanford Daily · Nov 2 · read ↗
💬The boards19% of recent board volume, a large share for one event. Board mood this week: mostly neutral · joy dominant (71%).›

This event was in 423 of 2190 board posts (19%) over the last 60 days, a large share of the conversation. Fan text is shown verbatim and credited to the community it came from; posters stay anonymous.

"Stanford hosts the Eastern Washington Eagles to open the season tonight. Stanford is favored by 14.5 and the over/under is 153.5. Implied score is 84-69.5. Stanford was picked to f"
The CARDboard ~ fan take
"Not a very encouraging start. Stanford is turning the ball over like crazy and Arizona is ahead 8-2. SMH. 20-11 end of first quarter. I guess nobody is following this game. Let me"
The CARDboard ~ fan take

Board health this week (56 posts): 14% positive · 77% neutral · 9% negative. This is the team's mood for the whole week, across all topics. Board posters are a vocal, self-selected slice of the fanbase.

Following now · Stanford · Coaching

New coverage keeps arriving on Tavita Pritchard at Stanford.

Tavita Pritchard took over as Stanford's head coach, replacing Frank Reich. It is the program's third head coach in five seasons. The coverage has moved from the hire itself to what followed it. The coverage is divided, and believers and skeptics both cite evidence.

bullish, with real dissent doubt on the left, belief on the right · bigger dot, louder
Skeptics1 doubtful post
Believers7 upbeat posts
Fans: 1% volume · mostly neutral
Developing2 new this week
3 days agoWhy Tavita Pritchard Went for Trickery and a 4th-and-4 Gamble Against Louisville · Yahoo Sports
last weekTavita Pritchard on the Program's Growth and the Fourth-Down Call He'd Take Back · roundtable.io
3 weeks agoStanford coach Tavita Pritchard owns up to disappointing performance against Notre Dame · On3
Sep 11Win total (line at 3.5) still unmoved 13d after "Hawaii star out for season opener"
Sep 10Win total (line at 3.5) still unmoved 12d after "Hawaii star out for season opener"
The cast who's driving the story · latest headline on each, attributed
Tavita Pritchard Head coach
“Why Tavita Pritchard Went for Trickery and a 4th-and-4 Gamble Against Louisville” — Yahoo Sports · 2026-11-01
Frank Reich Out
Andrew Luck QB
“Tavita Pritchard on Stanford’s New Era, Andrew Luck & QB Competition | Sports Illustrated” — Yahoo Sports · 2026-08-21
Challenges Facing Hawaii
“Stanford Notes: Pritchard's First Game, Challenges Facing Hawaii” — roundtable.io · 2026-08-28
Our read
Tavita Pritchard inherits a 4-8 roster and a program that hasn't won a conference title since 2013 — the admissions office identity clashes with a rebuild demanding results, not just tradition.
Source of record: Tavita Pritchard took over as Stanford's head coach, replacing Frank Reich — the program's third head coach in five seasons.
How fans are reacting · tap to expand
Believers bullishSkeptics dissentThe Boards quietThe Dominoes active
📣Believers7 bullish/hire items making the case that it's working.›

The 'this hire changes everything' takes: new-era believers making the case early.

“Everything Stanford HC Tavita Pritchard said following Duke's win”
Duke Wire · Sep 20 · read ↗
“Recap: Stanford opens up Tavita Pritchard era with win over Hawaii”
On3 CFB · Aug 31 · read ↗
“Stanford's Tavita Pritchard era begins with win on Pacific Islander night”
Yahoo Sports · Aug 30 · read ↗
🧐SkepticsLeading counter: “Stanford coach Tavita Pritchard owns up to disappointing…”.›

The 'show me the body of work' counter: resume gaps, scheme fits, and 'not that guy' reads.

“Stanford coach Tavita Pritchard owns up to disappointing performance against Notre Dame”
On3 · Oct 11 · read ↗
💬The boards1% of recent board volume, less than the headlines suggest. Board mood this week: mostly neutral · joy dominant (71%).›

This event was in 15 of 2190 board posts (1%) over the last 60 days, a modest share of the conversation. Fan text is shown verbatim and credited to the community it came from; posters stay anonymous.

"1. The road woes continue, with little sign we belong in Power Four but at least with some signs of life. Are we the worst power team (dropped to Sagarin #97 and SP+ #118)? Yes, wi"
The CARDboard ~ fan take
"ACC STANDINGS: WHO GOES BOWLING? This is Separation week for ACC Championship. The ranked teams above us will each win: #1 MIAM, #14 WAKE, #19 SMU. SMU hosts WAKE on Nov. 14 for th"
The CARDboard ~ fan take

Board health this week (56 posts): 14% positive · 77% neutral · 9% negative. This is the team's mood for the whole week, across all topics. Board posters are a vocal, self-selected slice of the fanbase.

🔗The dominoes18 downstream moves tied to the hire.›

The second-order trail: commits, decommits, portal and staff knock-on from the hire.

“Stanford scores four-star Hawaii QB Hunter Fujikawa as first 2028 commit”
The Stanford Daily · Nov 4 · read ↗
“Stanford commit Braden Chaffin "couldn't pass up" Michigan visit”
On3 · Nov 2 · read ↗

More in this tab

This week and this season

Worth watchingGames average 58 combined points, even games

What it is like to watch them2026 · 4-5

Game feel58even gamescombined pts / game6th highest-scoring of 17 in the ACC
Heart rate2-0rarely closein one-score games (2 of 9)16th most one-score games of 17 in the ACC
Margin-17.0outgunnedavg scoring margin17th best margin of 17 in the ACC
Tempo66average paceoffensive plays / game12th fastest of 17 in the ACC
Big plays1.29some popexplosiveness (IsoPPP)7th most explosive of 17 in the ACC
Home crowd23,443avg attendance16th biggest crowds of 17 in the ACC

Measured from 9 games · ranks are among ACC teams the same season

Team storyThe story of this team right now, in one line.
The weekly grind

Stanford ran power football out of an admissions office and reached two Rose Bowls doing it — now it's the program watching the NIL era treat its highest standards as a recruiting handicap, with Andrew Luck in a suit trying to reverse-engineer the climb back.

Title DroughtSince 2015 · 11 yrs

Fans hear the same verdict on a loop — that the academic standard is now an anchor, that paying players broke the only model Stanford had, that the smart school can't survive a sport that stopped…

Read the full program story ↓
Game-day weatherKickoff-time weather at home, and the forecast in game week.

Stanford · Game-day weather

Typical at Stanford Stadium: kickoff time makes little difference, scores run 95 to 98

  • noon: 96, Comfortable
  • 3:30 pm: 95, Comfortable
  • 7:30 pm: 98, Comfortable

Typical weather score at each kickoff time.

Tap a dot to read it.

Weather score: 0 to 100, higher is better, for the first 3 hours and 20 minutes of the game. Ideal is 100, Comfortable 90 to 99, Mixed 75 to 89, Rough 50 to 74, Harsh under 50.

Game dayWhat a Saturday in this stadium actually feels like.
The experience

Stanford is the program that ran power football out of an admissions office.

Offense: SoftRun/Pass: Pass-first, spreadStyle: Explosive, big-play
Open questionsThe unresolved questions this season keeps asking.
Program ledgerEvery dated move on this program's record, newest first.

The program ledger

since 2025
  • 2026Hired Tavita Pritchard
  • 2025Frank Reich departs (interim)4-8
  • 2025Hired Frank Reich (interim)

Roster and recruiting

Roster21% of production back, talent #50

Roster reload: Stanford

2026 snapshot, Nov 4
Returning Production21%Low continuity / heavy reload
Talent Composite#50 nationally247 composite 705.8
Portal Additions6Primary repair: CB
Portal Losses12Primary pressure: QB
Draft Loss2NFL Draft departures (2), 1 with a next man up identified below
Recruiting Reload#37Development class
QBin 1 - Davis Warren3.50out 3 - Elijah Brown3.50Starter Risk
current room: 214 lbs avg (2025 roster)
Pocket Passeroperates within the system without forcing anything
Transferred in
WRin 2 - Nico Brown3.60out 2 - Jason Thompson3.49Even
current room: 186 lbs avg (2025 roster)
OTin 1 - Dara Adeyemi3.50out 2 - Emeka Ugorji3.60Downgrade
IOLin 1 - Aidan Kilstrom3.50out 1 - Zak Yamauchi3.60Even
current room: 306 lbs avg (2025 roster)
EDGEin 0out 1 - Wilfredo Aybar4.28Downgrade
CBin 1 - Leroy Bryant3.60out 0Upgrade
current room: 187 lbs avg (2025 roster)
Cover Cornerdoesn't get beat deep and rarely gives up the big play
Transferred in
Next man up
TE · departedSam Roush4★ · Rd 3, Pk 5
NowAiden Black3★ · FR
Next man up
Full roster (113 players)
Top commits

Top 1 commits

2027 class
★★★★☆
Sione Kaho
QB · Tacoma, WA
#413 national
Recruiting buzzWhat fans say about the incoming class right now.

Community pulse

No high-engagement r/cfb discussions tracked for this program in the last year.

Fans and ratings

Mood vs. historyFan mood is higher than 89% of FBS programs
↑

Fan confidence higher than any point since 2025

89th percentile among FBS programs

Fans vs. the lineWhere fans and the betting market read this team differently.
Fan vs. market↑
89th
Fan mood
(percentile among FBS)
3.5
Sportsbook win total
(2nd among FBS)
Fans 87pp more bullish than market implies
Win total consensus · 1 book
RivalsRival pulse: Notre Dame uneasy, Legends Trophy California uneasy

Rival pulse

Notre Dame
Uneasy
-10
Legends Trophy
California
Uneasy
-5
Big Game

Fan mood index · most recent r/CFB data

More

Current chapterThe story this season is telling right now.
5
Coaching hire

Stanford’s coaching transition, reshaping program direction.

Tavita Pritchard inherits a 4-8 roster and a program that hasn't won a conference title since 2013 — the admissions office identity clashes with a rebuild demanding results, not just tradition.

FollowThe team's own sites, its reporters and its podcasts.

Follow Stanford

Each link was checked against two outside sites.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. Text written by our model says so in a line beneath it, and it can get facts wrong. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site