Home Conferences FBS 2026 season

The weekly grind · 2026

ACC

The Flip

Miami holds the ACC lead heading into this week's games.

ACC is more top-heavy than deep. Miami gives the league punch, but the middle tier falls away faster than the top leagues.

#6Overall
#6In FBS
+20.5Conference strength
+25.1Upper strength
17Teams
2Top-25 teams
Power snapshot Projected 2026 standing

The Flip

Miami went 13-3 in 2025 and holds the ACC's highest power rating entering 2026 — the strongest the program has looked since winning the 2001 national title. Meanwhile Clemson, who won six straight ACC titles from 2015-2021, went 7-6 last year. The power structure in the ACC just flipped.

2 top-25 teams.

The depth argument for this conference rests on how many credible opponents are clustered behind the leader. A wide talent spread separates the haves from the have-nots.

Where things stand right now.

Miami holds the ACC lead heading into this week's games.

Tools Matchup simulator Compare teams Playoff forecast Style map Head to head Power map

Miami at 13-3 Is the ACC’s Best Story in Twenty Years

Miami went 13-3 in 2025 and enters 2026 as the conference’s top-rated program. They’re recruiting at an elite level and winning games at a rate the program hasn’t seen since the 2001 title. The 2026 Miami-Clemson game is the conference’s defining matchup — a reigning dynasty against a program reclaiming the standard.

Clemson Went 7-6 — the Worst Season Under Dabo Since 2010

Clemson won six ACC titles in a row from 2015-2021 and finished 2025 at 7-6. Dabo Swinney’s program has never had a losing conference season in that stretch, but the recruiting gap with Miami and Florida State is closing. Whether 2025 was a down year or the start of a longer slide is the most important question in the ACC entering 2026.

Why it matters →

Virginia at 11-3 Is a Coaching Premium Nobody Expected

Virginia went 11-3 in 2025 with a recruiting class ranked #58 nationally — the biggest overperformance relative to talent in the ACC. A program that had four consecutive losing seasons from 2020-2023 is now winning eleven games. The question heading into 2026 is whether they can sustain it against a Miami program that’s now actively competing for the same recruits.

Why it matters →

Active arcs

All arcs →
Fan pulse Last 30 days · 13,172 mentions
16% positive 44% neutral 40% negative
Florida State
4,118
↓ negative
Miami
2,292
→ neutral
California
1,392
↓ negative
North Carolina
827
↓ negative
Syracuse
760
↓ negative
Wake Forest
653
↓ negative
Fan confidence by FBS percentile

Where each ACC program stands nationally in fan sentiment (100th = most positive in FBS, 0 = least). Conference median: 35th percentile. The label is the band (Bullish, Leaning, Mixed, Souring); the number after it is the change in percentile points since the prior week.

Stanford
Bullish+25
Virginia Tech
Bullish+17
Syracuse
Leaning+13
Virginia
Leaning+33
Wake Forest
Leaning+3
Boston College
Leaning+11
Louisville
Leaning+19
Georgia Tech
Mixed+20
Clemson
Mixed+6
SMU
Mixed0
NC State
Mixed-15
Pittsburgh
Mixed+3
California
Souring+5
Florida State
Souring+16
Miami
Souring-10
Duke
Souring-19

Most volatile: Louisville

Fan confidence has swung 81 percentile points in the last 8 weeks — currently at the 53rd percentile nationally.

Rivalry face-offs

The coaching premium
Recruiting class rank vs. SP+ performance — where coaches add or subtract value
Above line = coaching premium
Below line = underperforming
Gap = recruiting rank minus SP+ rank

Positive gap means the coaching staff won more than the recruiting class predicted. Data: ACC teams, 17 programs.

Coaching grades
Coaching premium ↑
Virginia
+37
Duke
+30
Wake
+21
Louisville
+20
Miami
+4
Underperforming ↓
Stanford
-92
Ga. Tech
-77
California
-72
Syracuse
-61
Fla. St.
-51

Standings

2026 season, in progress — sorted by power rating. The tag beside a team is its long-run program standing.

#TeamRecordPowerResume
1 MiamiPower Program I#11 8-0 +30.8 +99.7
2 Wake ForestNational Program III#58 7-1 +27.4 +98.7
3 LouisvillePower Program III#28 5-3 +25.8 +91.8
4 SMUNational Program I#34 6-2 +24.9 +56.2
5 DukeNational Program II#51 6-2 +23.8 +87.9
6 ClemsonBlue Blood#4 5-3 +23.4 +79.6
7 PittsburghNational Program I#36 6-3 +22.2 +67.2
8 Virginia TechNational Program I#42 6-2 +21.3 +85.3
9 NC StateNational Program I#41 4-4 +20.4 +42.3
10 North CarolinaNational Program II#54 4-4 +20.3 +96.1
11 Florida StatePower Program II#21▼ 3-5 +19.7 +85.9
12 VirginiaNational Program III#65 4-5 +18.7 +47.8
13 SyracuseRegional Program II#88 4-4 +16.5 +90.1
14 Boston CollegeRegional Program I#81 4-4 +15.4 +84.1
15 Georgia TechNational Program II#57 2-6 +14.7 +41.2
16 CaliforniaRegional Program I#74▼ 3-6 +13.6 +40.0
17 StanfordRegional Program I#71 4-5 +13.4 +78.9

Projected standings · ACC · 2026

Win projection

Odds of winning at least N conference games from current power ratings — full slate played out, not locked to results. Avg = expected wins; W-L = most-likely record.

# Team W-L Pwr Avg ≥9≥8≥7≥6≥5≥4≥3≥2≥1
Favorites
1Miami7-2+10.16.552352789398✓✓✓
2Wake Forest6-3+6.75.82103058829599✓✓
3Louisville6-3+5.15.72103057819499✓✓
Challengers
4SMU6-3+4.25.7192957819499✓✓
5Duke5-4+3.05.141639678797✓✓
6Pittsburgh5-4+1.54.93143563859699✓
7Virginia Tech5-4+0.64.82113159829599✓
8Clemson5-3+2.74.6182653799499✓
The field
9NC State5-4−0.34.72102854789399✓
10Virginia4-5−2.14.1151739668797✓
11Syracuse4-5−4.23.62102752789399
12North Carolina4-4−0.43.6282551789499
13Florida State3-5−1.03.5172349769399
14Boston College3-5−5.32.931132618698
Rebuilding
15California3-6−7.13.1151637658898
16Georgia Tech3-5−6.12.821028568397
17Stanford3-6−7.32.72926548196

How they play

Six advanced-stat dimensions per team, ranked against all 134 FBS programs, 2026 season. Every column reads higher-is-better. Click a column to sort.

ScoringConvertsBig playsDefensePacePass rate
Team ScoringConvertsBig playsDefensePacePass rate Identity
Miami+0.3952.6%+1.31−0.0469.246.8%Efficient offense
Wake Forest+0.3648.9%+1.32−0.0266.144.8%Efficient offense
Louisville+0.3449.9%+1.42−0.0663.042.9%Big-play offense
SMU+0.2748.9%+1.27−0.0768.649.0%Efficient offense
Duke+0.2542.1%+1.35+0.0467.545.7%Lockdown defense
Clemson−0.0236.4%+1.17+0.0069.644.9%Can't sustain drives
Pittsburgh+0.1544.0%+1.20+0.0172.048.6%Balanced
Virginia Tech+0.2044.9%+1.28−0.0372.247.9%Balanced
NC State+0.2045.5%+1.15−0.1369.446.7%Balanced
North Carolina+0.1646.7%+1.15−0.0959.850.4%Grind-it-out
Florida State+0.2043.4%+1.40−0.1864.242.6%Big-play offense
Virginia+0.1242.2%+1.13−0.0867.442.0%No explosive plays
Syracuse+0.0742.3%+1.25−0.1079.647.1%High-tempo
Boston College+0.0140.7%+1.20−0.0564.041.4%Balanced
Georgia Tech+0.1141.6%+1.31−0.1963.952.6%Defense is the problem
California−0.0237.3%+1.20−0.1870.361.0%Can't sustain drives
Stanford+0.0737.3%+1.29−0.3365.754.1%Defense is the problem

Identity is the single dimension where a team is most above or below the FBS average (pace, defense, big plays, or converting drives) — "Balanced" means nothing stands out either way. CFBD 2026 advanced stats, excludes garbage time.

Top players

ACC's highest CFB Zeitgeist Scores, 2026 season so far.

#PlayerTeamNational
1Malachi ToneyWRMiami#1 of 465
2Elliot Washington IICBClemson#3 of 344
3Umari HatcherWRSyracuse#5 of 465
4Tawfiq ThomasIDLGeorgia Tech#3 of 300
5Kaleb BeasleySLouisville#2 of 537
6Nate SheppardRBDuke#3 of 330
7Davien KerrCBSyracuse#5 of 344
8Carlos HernandezWRWake Forest#7 of 465
9Will HeldtEDGEClemson#7 of 405
10Rashard PerryIDLSyracuse#6 of 300

Where ACC stands nationally

Conference strength, as a round-robin adjusted power rating.

1 SEC SEC
+24.4
2 B10 Big Ten
+23.3
3 IND FBS Independents
+21.7
4 B12 Big 12
+21.5
5 P12 Pac-12
+20.8
6 ACC ACC
+20.5
7 AAC American Athletic
+18.3
8 SB Sun Belt
+17.3
9 MW Mountain West
+16.5
10 CUSA Conference USA
+16.4

The ACC in History