CFB Zeitgeist

Home Conferences FBS 2026 season

VERDICT BEGINS · 2026

Big Ten

The Coast-to-Coast Era

The 2026 Big Ten season is underway — Ohio State holds the early power lead, but the picture is still open.

Big Ten carries real selection-room weight with 7 teams inside the top 25 and Ohio State driving a legitimate national ceiling.

#2overall
#2in FBS
+21.7RR50
+26.6upper strength
18teams
7top-25 teams
Power snapshot Projected 2026 standing

The Coast-to-Coast Era

Indiana's 16-0 run in 2025 ended an eleven-year conference championship drought and gave the Big Ten its first national title since 2002. The coast-to-coast expansion delivered both the talent depth and the schedule credibility to put Indiana on a pedestal nobody predicted. Now the question is whether that ceiling is repeatable.

7 top-25 teams.

The depth argument for this conference rests on how many credible opponents are clustered behind the leader. A wide talent spread separates the haves from the have-nots.

Where things stand right now.

The 2026 Big Ten season is underway — Ohio State holds the early power lead, but the picture is still open.

Tools Matchup Simulator Compare Teams Playoff Forecast Style map Head to head Power map

Indiana Enters 2026 With a Target on Its Back

Indiana went 16-0 in 2025 — regular season, conference title, and national championship. They return as the highest-rated program in the conference and the CFP's defending champion. Every schedule-maker circled their name. The question is whether Indiana can meet a higher standard of opponent preparation in Year 2.

Why it matters →

Oregon Is Built for a Deep CFP Run

Oregon holds the conference's second-highest power rating entering 2026 and carries the clearest path to a first-round bye among non-Indiana programs. Dan Lanning's program is the Big Ten's argument that West Coast expansion raised the conference ceiling — and the most likely challenger to Indiana's title defense.

Why it matters →

Ohio State's Title Window Is Still Open

Ohio State has reached the CFP in three of the last four seasons and still hasn't won it all since 2014. Ryan Day's roster is talented enough to compete — the question is whether they can close the gap against elite competition when it matters most.

Why it matters →

Active arcs our read

All arcs →
Fan pulse Last 30 days · 35,243 mentions
18% positive 45% neutral 37% negative
Michigan
6,387
↓ negative
Ohio State
6,257
↓ negative
Nebraska
4,665
↓ negative
Oregon
2,992
↓ negative
Penn State
2,290
↓ negative
Washington
1,875
→ neutral
Fan confidence — FBS percentile

Where each Big Ten program stands nationally in fan sentiment (100th = most positive in FBS, 0 = least). Conference median: 30th percentile.

Nebraska
Leaning
Iowa
Leaning+2
Northwestern
Leaning-3
Indiana
Leaning-5
Minnesota
Leaning-4
USC
Leaning+2
Purdue
Mixed-9
Maryland
Mixed-19
Oregon
Mixed-7
Illinois
Mixed-7
Rutgers
Mixed-4
Ohio State
Mixed
UCLA
Souring-14
Penn State
Souring-8
Wisconsin
Souring-6
Washington
Souring-23
Michigan
Souring-11

Most volatile: Washington

Fan confidence has swung 64 percentile points in the last 8 weeks — currently at the 9th percentile nationally.

Rivalry face-offs

The coaching premium
Recruiting class rank vs. SP+ performance — where coaches add or subtract value
Above line = coaching premium
Below line = underperforming
Gap = recruiting rank minus SP+ rank

Positive gap means the coaching staff won more than the recruiting class predicted. Data: Big Ten teams, 18 programs.

Coaching grades
Coaching premium ↑
Nebraska
+51
Northwestern
+41
Penn St.
+30
Indiana
+20
UCLA
+12
Underperforming ↓
Mich. St.
-90
Purdue
-62
Rutgers
-57
Illinois
-44
USC
-24

Standings

2026 season, in progress — sorted by power rating. Stature tag = interim Zeitgeist calibration (medium confidence).

#TeamRecordRR50Resume
1 Ohio StateBlue Blood#2 1-1 +33.2 +51.0
2 OregonPower Program I#6 1-1 +31.2 +10.8
3 IndianaPower Program II#21 2-0 +28.1 +64.2
4 NorthwesternNational Program III#65 1-0 +26.5 +66.3
5 IowaPower Program III#24 2-0 +25.6 +72.5
6 MichiganBlue Blood#5 2-0 +25.5 +99.9
7 USCPower Program I#13 3-0 +24.3 +98.7
8 WashingtonPower Program I#15 2-0 +23.8 +98.4
9 Penn StatePower Program I#11 2-0 +22.9 +98.8
10 NebraskaNational Program II#42 2-0 +22.7 +96.9
11 MinnesotaNational Program I#40 1-1 +22.0 +16.5
12 UCLANational Program I#38 2-0 +20.9 +99.0
13 MarylandNational Program III#72 2-0 +18.9 +94.2
14 IllinoisNational Program II#47 1-1 +18.4 +74.9
15 RutgersRegional Program I#86 0-2 +16.6 +7.2
16 WisconsinPower Program III#29 1-1 +16.5 +79.3
17 PurdueRegional Program III#95 1-1 +14.0 +65.7
18 Michigan StateNational Program II#55 2-0 +11.7 +97.8

Projected Standings · Big Ten · 2026

Win Projection

Odds of winning at least N conference games from current power ratings — full slate played out, not locked to results. AVG = expected wins; W–L = most-likely record.

# Team W–L PWR AVG ≥9≥8≥7≥6≥5≥4≥3≥2≥1
Favorites
1Ohio State6–3+10.86.231844719097
2Oregon6–3+8.86.231642708997
3Indiana6–3+5.75.5182552779298
4Northwestern5–4+4.15.131538668797
Challengers
5Iowa5–4+3.35.14153865869699
6Penn State5–4+0.55.03143563849699
7Michigan5–4+3.14.93133562849699
8Washington5–4+1.44.72112956809499
9USC5–4+1.94.6292753779399
The Field
10UCLA5–4-1.54.72102855809499
11Nebraska4–5+0.34.4172247739198
12Minnesota4–5-0.44.3172145718998
13Maryland4–5-3.54.2151740688897
14Illinois4–5-4.03.6292652789499
Rebuilding
15Wisconsin4–5-5.93.83123158829599
16Rutgers3–6-5.83.5282348759299
17Purdue3–6-8.42.9131232608597
18Michigan State2–7-10.62.51721477695

How they play

Six advanced-stat dimensions per team, ranked against all 134 FBS programs, 2026 season. Every column reads higher-is-better. Click a column to sort.

ScoringConvertsBig playsDefensePacePass rate
Team ScoringConvertsBig playsDefensePacePass rate Identity
Ohio State+0.4147.6%+1.39+0.0467.551.1%Balanced
Oregon+0.2138.2%+1.58-0.0761.054.9%Big-play offense
Indiana+0.6153.5%+1.58+0.0954.029.6%Grind-it-out
Northwestern+0.4850.9%+1.49-0.1355.043.6%Grind-it-out
Iowa+0.0440.1%+1.07+0.1368.551.1%Lockdown defense
Michigan+0.1335.7%+1.36+0.0253.037.7%Grind-it-out
USC+0.3756.8%+1.15-0.0671.745.6%Efficient offense
Washington+0.0744.2%+1.00+0.0269.055.1%No explosive plays
Penn State+0.3147.5%+1.24-0.0066.540.6%Balanced
Nebraska+0.5456.0%+1.46-0.1270.045.7%Efficient offense
Minnesota+0.1148.6%+1.02-0.0367.060.5%No explosive plays
UCLA+0.2849.9%+1.17-0.0260.037.5%Balanced
Maryland+0.3853.2%+1.28+0.0978.051.3%High-tempo
Illinois+0.3552.7%+1.22-0.2755.547.8%Defense is the problem
Rutgers+0.1340.4%+1.47-0.2365.549.6%Big-play offense
Wisconsin+0.1438.5%+1.43-0.1757.045.6%Balanced
Purdue+0.3350.0%+1.13-0.1878.048.7%High-tempo
Michigan State+0.1746.2%+1.13-0.1977.039.0%Balanced

Identity is the single dimension where a team is most above or below the FBS average (pace, defense, big plays, or converting drives) — "Balanced" means nothing stands out either way. CFBD 2026 advanced stats, excludes garbage time.

Top players

Big Ten's highest CFB Index Scores, 2025 season.

#PlayerTeamNational
1John NestorCBMinnesota#2 of 364
2Jeremiah SmithWROhio State#1 of 485
3Teitum TuiotiLBOregon#4 of 583
4Rolijah HardyLBIndiana#6 of 583
5Anthony SmithEDGEMinnesota#9 of 420
6Isaiah JonesLBIndiana#13 of 583
7Jayden MaiavaQBUSC#4 of 146
8Tyrique TuckerEDGEIndiana#18 of 420
9Bishop FitzgeraldSUSC#14 of 544
10Julian SayinQBOhio State#5 of 146

Where Big Ten stands nationally

Conference strength by RR50 (round-robin adjusted power).

1 SEC SEC
+22.8
2 B10 Big Ten
+21.7
3 IND FBS Independents
+20.4
4 P12 Pac-12
+20.2
5 B12 Big 12
+19.5
6 ACC ACC
+19.2
7 AAC American Athletic
+17.3
8 SB Sun Belt
+17.0
9 CUSA Conference USA
+16.6
10 MAC Mid-American
+16.2