Big Ten, at a glance.
Top 10 by power rating — 2026 season, through the latest games.
Home Conferences FBS 2026 season
VERDICT BEGINS · 2026
The 2026 Big Ten season is underway — Ohio State holds the early power lead, but the picture is still open.
Big Ten carries real selection-room weight with 7 teams inside the top 25 and Ohio State driving a legitimate national ceiling.
Top 10 by power rating — 2026 season, through the latest games.
Indiana's 16-0 run in 2025 ended an eleven-year conference championship drought and gave the Big Ten its first national title since 2002. The coast-to-coast expansion delivered both the talent depth and the schedule credibility to put Indiana on a pedestal nobody predicted. Now the question is whether that ceiling is repeatable.




The depth argument for this conference rests on how many credible opponents are clustered behind the leader. A wide talent spread separates the haves from the have-nots.
The 2026 Big Ten season is underway — Ohio State holds the early power lead, but the picture is still open.
The National ChampionsIndiana went 16-0 in 2025 — regular season, conference title, and national championship. They return as the highest-rated program in the conference and the CFP's defending champion. Every schedule-maker circled their name. The question is whether Indiana can meet a higher standard of opponent preparation in Year 2.
Why it matters →
The FrontrunnerOregon holds the conference's second-highest power rating entering 2026 and carries the clearest path to a first-round bye among non-Indiana programs. Dan Lanning's program is the Big Ten's argument that West Coast expansion raised the conference ceiling — and the most likely challenger to Indiana's title defense.
Why it matters →
The Storied ProgramOhio State has reached the CFP in three of the last four seasons and still hasn't won it all since 2014. Ryan Day's roster is talented enough to compete — the question is whether they can close the gap against elite competition when it matters most.
Why it matters →Will Texas Tech prevail in its dispute with the Big 12 over quarterback Brendan Sorsby?
How will these new series impact both programs' schedules?
How will David Gabriel-Georges impact Tennessee's future?
Can Iowa overcome its losses and maintain success?
Can Rutgers bounce back after this tough loss?
Where each Big Ten program stands nationally in fan sentiment (100th = most positive in FBS, 0 = least). Conference median: 30th percentile.
Most volatile: Washington
Fan confidence has swung 64 percentile points in the last 8 weeks — currently at the 9th percentile nationally.
Positive gap means the coaching staff won more than the recruiting class predicted. Data: Big Ten teams, 18 programs.
2026 season, in progress — sorted by power rating. Stature tag = interim Zeitgeist calibration (medium confidence).
| # | Team | Record | RR50 | Resume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ohio StateBlue Blood#2
|
1-1 | +33.2 | +51.0 |
| 2 |
OregonPower Program I#6
|
1-1 | +31.2 | +10.8 |
| 3 |
IndianaPower Program II#21
|
2-0 | +28.1 | +64.2 |
| 4 |
NorthwesternNational Program III#65
|
1-0 | +26.5 | +66.3 |
| 5 |
IowaPower Program III#24
|
2-0 | +25.6 | +72.5 |
| 6 |
MichiganBlue Blood#5
|
2-0 | +25.5 | +99.9 |
| 7 |
USCPower Program I#13
|
3-0 | +24.3 | +98.7 |
| 8 |
WashingtonPower Program I#15
|
2-0 | +23.8 | +98.4 |
| 9 |
Penn StatePower Program I#11
|
2-0 | +22.9 | +98.8 |
| 10 |
NebraskaNational Program II#42
|
2-0 | +22.7 | +96.9 |
| 11 |
MinnesotaNational Program I#40
|
1-1 | +22.0 | +16.5 |
| 12 |
UCLANational Program I#38
|
2-0 | +20.9 | +99.0 |
| 13 |
MarylandNational Program III#72
|
2-0 | +18.9 | +94.2 |
| 14 |
IllinoisNational Program II#47
|
1-1 | +18.4 | +74.9 |
| 15 |
RutgersRegional Program I#86
|
0-2 | +16.6 | +7.2 |
| 16 |
WisconsinPower Program III#29
|
1-1 | +16.5 | +79.3 |
| 17 |
PurdueRegional Program III#95
|
1-1 | +14.0 | +65.7 |
| 18 |
Michigan StateNational Program II#55
|
2-0 | +11.7 | +97.8 |
Projected Standings · Big Ten · 2026
Odds of winning at least N conference games from current power ratings — full slate played out, not locked to results. AVG = expected wins; W–L = most-likely record.
| # | Team | W–L | PWR | AVG | ≥9 | ≥8 | ≥7 | ≥6 | ≥5 | ≥4 | ≥3 | ≥2 | ≥1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Favorites | |||||||||||||
| 1 | Ohio State | 6–3 | +10.8 | 6.2 | 3 | 18 | 44 | 71 | 90 | 97 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 2 | Oregon | 6–3 | +8.8 | 6.2 | 3 | 16 | 42 | 70 | 89 | 97 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3 | Indiana | 6–3 | +5.7 | 5.5 | 1 | 8 | 25 | 52 | 77 | 92 | 98 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 4 | Northwestern | 5–4 | +4.1 | 5.1 | 3 | 15 | 38 | 66 | 87 | 97 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Challengers | |||||||||||||
| 5 | Iowa | 5–4 | +3.3 | 5.1 | 4 | 15 | 38 | 65 | 86 | 96 | 99 | ✓ | |
| 6 | Penn State | 5–4 | +0.5 | 5.0 | 3 | 14 | 35 | 63 | 84 | 96 | 99 | ✓ | |
| 7 | Michigan | 5–4 | +3.1 | 4.9 | 3 | 13 | 35 | 62 | 84 | 96 | 99 | ✓ | |
| 8 | Washington | 5–4 | +1.4 | 4.7 | 2 | 11 | 29 | 56 | 80 | 94 | 99 | ✓ | |
| 9 | USC | 5–4 | +1.9 | 4.6 | 2 | 9 | 27 | 53 | 77 | 93 | 99 | ✓ | |
| The Field | |||||||||||||
| 10 | UCLA | 5–4 | -1.5 | 4.7 | 2 | 10 | 28 | 55 | 80 | 94 | 99 | ✓ | |
| 11 | Nebraska | 4–5 | +0.3 | 4.4 | 1 | 7 | 22 | 47 | 73 | 91 | 98 | ✓ | |
| 12 | Minnesota | 4–5 | -0.4 | 4.3 | 1 | 7 | 21 | 45 | 71 | 89 | 98 | ✓ | |
| 13 | Maryland | 4–5 | -3.5 | 4.2 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 40 | 68 | 88 | 97 | ✓ | |
| 14 | Illinois | 4–5 | -4.0 | 3.6 | 2 | 9 | 26 | 52 | 78 | 94 | 99 | ||
| Rebuilding | |||||||||||||
| 15 | Wisconsin | 4–5 | -5.9 | 3.8 | 3 | 12 | 31 | 58 | 82 | 95 | 99 | ||
| 16 | Rutgers | 3–6 | -5.8 | 3.5 | 2 | 8 | 23 | 48 | 75 | 92 | 99 | ||
| 17 | Purdue | 3–6 | -8.4 | 2.9 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 32 | 60 | 85 | 97 | ||
| 18 | Michigan State | 2–7 | -10.6 | 2.5 | 1 | 7 | 21 | 47 | 76 | 95 | |||
Six advanced-stat dimensions per team, ranked against all 134 FBS programs, 2026 season. Every column reads higher-is-better. Click a column to sort.
| Team | Scoring | Converts | Defense | Identity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ohio State | +0.41 | 47.6% | +0.04 | Balanced |
Oregon | +0.21 | 38.2% | -0.07 | Big-play offense |
Indiana | +0.61 | 53.5% | +0.09 | Grind-it-out |
Northwestern | +0.48 | 50.9% | -0.13 | Grind-it-out |
Iowa | +0.04 | 40.1% | +0.13 | Lockdown defense |
Michigan | +0.13 | 35.7% | +0.02 | Grind-it-out |
USC | +0.37 | 56.8% | -0.06 | Efficient offense |
Washington | +0.07 | 44.2% | +0.02 | No explosive plays |
Penn State | +0.31 | 47.5% | -0.00 | Balanced |
Nebraska | +0.54 | 56.0% | -0.12 | Efficient offense |
Minnesota | +0.11 | 48.6% | -0.03 | No explosive plays |
UCLA | +0.28 | 49.9% | -0.02 | Balanced |
Maryland | +0.38 | 53.2% | +0.09 | High-tempo |
Illinois | +0.35 | 52.7% | -0.27 | Defense is the problem |
Rutgers | +0.13 | 40.4% | -0.23 | Big-play offense |
Wisconsin | +0.14 | 38.5% | -0.17 | Balanced |
Purdue | +0.33 | 50.0% | -0.18 | High-tempo |
Michigan State | +0.17 | 46.2% | -0.19 | Balanced |
Identity is the single dimension where a team is most above or below the FBS average (pace, defense, big plays, or converting drives) — "Balanced" means nothing stands out either way. CFBD 2026 advanced stats, excludes garbage time.
Big Ten's highest CFB Index Scores, 2025 season.
| # | Player | Team | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John NestorCB | Minnesota | #2 of 364 |
| 2 | Jeremiah SmithWR | Ohio State | #1 of 485 |
| 3 | Teitum TuiotiLB | Oregon | #4 of 583 |
| 4 | Rolijah HardyLB | Indiana | #6 of 583 |
| 5 | Anthony SmithEDGE | Minnesota | #9 of 420 |
| 6 | Isaiah JonesLB | Indiana | #13 of 583 |
| 7 | Jayden MaiavaQB | USC | #4 of 146 |
| 8 | Tyrique TuckerEDGE | Indiana | #18 of 420 |
| 9 | Bishop FitzgeraldS | USC | #14 of 544 |
| 10 | Julian SayinQB | Ohio State | #5 of 146 |
Conference strength by RR50 (round-robin adjusted power).
Best available American odds · sportsbook consensus.
| # | Team | Odds |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ohio State
|
+125 |
| 2 |
Indiana
|
+225 |
| 3 |
Oregon
|
+280 |
| 4 |
USC
|
+900 |
| 5 |
Penn State
|
+1400 |
| 6 |
Washington
|
+2800 |
| 7 |
Michigan
|
+2500 |
| 8 |
Iowa
|
+3300 |
| 9 |
UCLA
|
+8000 |
| 10 |
Wisconsin
|
+8000 |