Home Conferences FBS 2026 season

The weekly grind · 2026

Mountain West

The Coaching Factory

New Mexico holds the Mountain West lead heading into this week's games.

Mountain West is outperforming its raw power profile. The league body of work is stronger than the market would expect.

#9Overall
#9In FBS
+16.5Conference strength
+20.7Upper strength
10Teams
0Top-25 teams
Power snapshot Projected 2026 standing

The Coaching Factory

The Mountain West doesn't have the recruiting budgets of the Power Four, but it has something else: almost every program in the conference plays better than its recruiting class should allow. New Mexico went 9-4 with the 138th-ranked recruiting class. Fresno State finished at SP+ #38 despite recruiting at #103. San Diego State sits at SP+ #32 with a #78 class. The Mountain West is the coaching premium capital of FBS.

0 top-25 teams.

The depth argument for this conference rests on how many credible opponents are clustered behind the leader. The gap between the top and bottom is narrow — a sign of genuine parity.

Where things stand right now.

New Mexico holds the Mountain West lead heading into this week's games.

Tools Matchup simulator Compare teams Playoff forecast Style map Head to head Power map

New Mexico Went 9-4 With the 138th Recruiting Class

New Mexico’s coaching premium is +83 — the gap between their #138 recruiting rank and their #55 SP+ rating. That’s one of the largest gaps in FBS. A program that spent most of the last decade finishing under .500 went 9-4 in 2025 and looked competitive against programs with three times the recruiting budget. Whether this is sustainable — or whether the Mountain West starts to lose players to the portal once national attention arrives — is the most interesting story in the conference.

Why it matters →

San Diego State Holds the Mountain West’s Best SP+ Rating

San Diego State holds the Mountain West’s highest SP+ ranking (#32) entering 2026, with a recruiting class ranked #78 nationally and a +46 coaching premium. The Aztecs went 9-4 in 2025 and are built around the same run-first, defense-first model that made them hard to beat for a decade. In a conference where most programs overperform, San Diego State is the one most likely to make noise in the CFP access conversation.

Why it matters →

Nevada and Colorado State Are Recruiting Better Than They’re Playing

Not every Mountain West program runs the coaching surplus. Nevada went 3-9 in 2025 with a recruiting class ranked #88 nationally — a -29 coaching gap that’s the conference’s worst. Colorado State finished 2-10 with a #106 class, a -21 gap. Wyoming went 4-8 despite recruiting at #89. These programs are the ceiling argument for what the conference can produce — and the floor argument for what happens when coaching doesn’t amplify the limited recruiting budget that every Mountain West school starts with.

Active arcs

All arcs →
Fan pulse Last 30 days · 1,463 mentions
18% positive 50% neutral 32% negative
North Dakota State
306
↓ negative
New Mexico
212
↑ positive
Hawai'i
183
↓ negative
Air Force
183
↓ negative
Nevada
141
↓ negative
UNLV
128
↓ negative
Fan confidence by FBS percentile

Where each Mountain West program stands nationally in fan sentiment (100th = most positive in FBS, 0 = least). Conference median: 77th percentile. The label is the band (Bullish, Leaning, Mixed, Souring); the number after it is the change in percentile points since the prior week.

UTEP
Bullish+26
San José State
Bullish+13
Wyoming
Bullish+26
New Mexico
Bullish+13
Nevada
Leaning+8
Air Force
Leaning+2
UNLV
Mixed+4
Hawai'i
Mixed+21

Most volatile: San José State

Fan confidence has swung 82 percentile points in the last 8 weeks — currently at the 96th percentile nationally.

The coaching premium
Recruiting class rank vs. SP+ performance — where coaches add or subtract value
Above line = coaching premium
Below line = underperforming
Gap = recruiting rank minus SP+ rank

Positive gap means the coaching staff won more than the recruiting class predicted. Data: Mountain West teams, 10 programs.

Coaching grades
Coaching premium ↑
Air Force
+60
North
+55
New
+35
Hawai'i
+20
San
+5
Underperforming ↓
UTEP
-73
Northern
-72
Nevada
-41
UNLV
-29
Wyoming
-2

Standings

2026 season, in progress — sorted by power rating. The tag beside a team is its long-run program standing.

Projected standings · Mountain West · 2026

Win projection

Odds of winning at least N conference games from current power ratings — full slate played out, not locked to results. Avg = expected wins; W-L = most-likely record.

# Team W-L Pwr Avg ≥8≥7≥6≥5≥4≥3≥2≥1
Favorites
1New Mexico5-3+6.65.231642719098✓✓
2North Dakota State5-3+5.55.021337668897✓✓
Challengers
3Air Force5-3+3.44.7192856819599✓
4UNLV4-4+1.94.241742708998✓
5Hawai'i4-4+0.44.241741688897✓
The field
6Wyoming4-4−0.33.931233618496✓
7San José State4-4−1.23.931232608496✓
8Nevada3-5−2.73.4172248759399
Rebuilding
9Northern Illinois3-5−5.23.1141537668998
10UTEP2-6−8.42.41620467695

How they play

Six advanced-stat dimensions per team, ranked against all 134 FBS programs, 2026 season. Every column reads higher-is-better. Click a column to sort.

ScoringConvertsBig playsDefensePacePass rate
Team ScoringConvertsBig playsDefensePacePass rate Identity
New Mexico+0.0941.2%+1.27+0.1562.528.4%Lockdown defense
North Dakota State+0.1039.6%+1.33+0.1265.340.1%Lockdown defense
Air Force+0.2250.1%+1.02−0.0973.211.8%High-tempo
UNLV+0.1339.4%+1.29−0.0965.941.8%Balanced
Hawai'i+0.0640.8%+1.14−0.1871.061.3%No explosive plays
Wyoming+0.1445.5%+1.07−0.1357.537.6%Grind-it-out
San José State+0.0737.1%+1.23−0.0664.648.7%Can't sustain drives
Nevada+0.0338.3%+1.31−0.0964.642.8%Balanced
Northern Illinois−0.0338.9%+1.23−0.2662.853.0%Defense is the problem
UTEP−0.1033.3%+1.37−0.2457.838.7%Grind-it-out

Identity is the single dimension where a team is most above or below the FBS average (pace, defense, big plays, or converting drives) — "Balanced" means nothing stands out either way. CFBD 2026 advanced stats, excludes garbage time.

Top players

Mountain West's highest CFB Zeitgeist Scores, 2026 season so far.

#PlayerTeamNational
1Dylan LeeLBSan José State#2 of 567
2Mumu Bin-WahadCBUNLV#4 of 344
3Jayland McGlothenEDGESan José State#5 of 405
4Logan LarsonIDLNorth Dakota State#4 of 300
5Marion MooreCBNorth Dakota State#10 of 344
6Kal-El TogafauIDLUNLV#9 of 300
7Blake FletcherLBAir Force#15 of 567
8Tre FultonSUNLV#9 of 537
9Max MustellCBAir Force#13 of 344
10Jones ThomasSWyoming#10 of 537

Where Mountain West stands nationally

Conference strength, as a round-robin adjusted power rating.

1 SEC SEC
+24.4
2 B10 Big Ten
+23.3
3 IND FBS Independents
+21.7
4 B12 Big 12
+21.5
5 P12 Pac-12
+20.8
6 ACC ACC
+20.5
7 AAC American Athletic
+18.3
8 SB Sun Belt
+17.3
9 MW Mountain West
+16.5
10 CUSA Conference USA
+16.4