Big 12, at a glance.
Top 10 by power rating — 2026 season, through the latest games.
Home Conferences FBS 2026 season
VERDICT BEGINS · 2026
The 2026 Big 12 season is underway — Texas Tech holds the early power lead, but the picture is still open.
Big 12 looks stronger on team quality than on season resume, which makes it a dangerous future-facing league.
Top 10 by power rating — 2026 season, through the latest games.
The Big 12 absorbed UCF, BYU, Cincinnati, and Houston in 2023, then lost Oklahoma and Texas to the SEC and gained Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado, and Utah in 2024 — three full rounds of realignment that redrew the conference map entirely. Boise State joined from the Mountain West in 2026, completing the post-Pac-12 landscape.




The depth argument for this conference rests on how many credible opponents are clustered behind the leader. The gap between the top and bottom is narrow — a sign of genuine parity.
The 2026 Big 12 season is underway — Texas Tech holds the early power lead, but the picture is still open.
The Coaching StoryTexas Tech finished 12-2 in 2025 with a recruiting class ranked #48 nationally — the second-biggest coaching premium in the Big 12 by the numbers. Joey McGuire built a program that wins with scheme and development, not recruiting, in a conference where most programs with that recruiting rank finish 5-7. The Big 12's best coaching story is happening in Lubbock and most people aren't watching closely enough.
Why it matters →
The CollapseOklahoma State finished 2025 at 1-11 with a recruiting class ranked #53 nationally. The gap between raw talent and results was the widest in the conference — a program that built its identity on player development and coaching suddenly failing at both. Whether 2026 is a reset or a continued slide is the conference's most uncomfortable question.
Why it matters →
The Recruiting QuestionTexas holds the #1 recruiting class in the conference entering 2026 — and went 10-3 in 2025, which sounds good until you compare it to what Texas Tech did with the #48 class. The Longhorns' talent floor is the highest in the league. Whether that translates to a conference title before the 2026 offseason realignment window reshapes the map again is the conference's defining power-structure question.
Why it matters →Will Texas Tech prevail in its dispute with the Big 12 over quarterback Brendan Sorsby?
What did Cincinnati know about Sorsby's gambling activities?
Can Jimmy Rogers sustain this success as Iowa State's coach?
How will BYU perform in its Week 2 matchup against Arizona?
Does Zayden Smith's commitment keep Texas Tech's 2027 class in the national top five?
Where each Big 12 program stands nationally in fan sentiment (100th = most positive in FBS, 0 = least). Conference median: 50th percentile.
Most volatile: Utah
Fan confidence has swung 58 percentile points in the last 8 weeks — currently at the 76th percentile nationally.
Positive gap means the coaching staff won more than the recruiting class predicted. Data: Big 12 teams, 16 programs.
2026 season, in progress — sorted by power rating. Stature tag = interim Zeitgeist calibration (medium confidence).
| # | Team | Record | RR50 | Resume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Texas TechPower Program III#26
|
2-0 | +28.7 | +96.3 |
| 2 |
BYUNational Program I#32
|
2-0 | +28.1 | +97.6 |
| 3 |
HoustonNational Program II#43
|
2-0 | +24.5 | +93.7 |
| 4 |
Kansas StatePower Program III#27
|
2-0 | +24.3 | +97.3 |
| 5 |
ArizonaNational Program II#59
|
1-1 | +24.1 | +65.9 |
| 6 |
UtahPower Program II#20
|
2-0 | +23.7 | +72.9 |
| 7 |
BaylorNational Program I#35
|
1-1 | +23.0 | +53.6 |
| 8 |
Arizona StateNational Program I#36
|
1-1 | +21.6 | +57.8 |
| 9 |
TCUPower Program II#23
|
1-1 | +20.5 | +22.0 |
| 10 |
KansasRegional Program I#75
|
1-1 | +17.5 | +60.5 |
| 11 |
UCFNational Program II#50
|
1-1 | +16.4 | +79.6 |
| 12 |
CincinnatiNational Program II#46
|
2-0 | +14.6 | +92.7 |
| 13 |
Iowa StateNational Program I#39
|
1-1 | +13.0 | +92.1 |
| 14 |
ColoradoRegional Program II#94
|
2-0 | +12.7 | +96.1 |
| 15 |
West VirginiaNational Program II#61
|
2-0 | +11.0 | +82.9 |
| 16 |
Oklahoma StateNational Program II#44
|
1-1 | +8.5 | +93.3 |
Projected Standings · Big 12 · 2026
Odds of winning at least N conference games from current power ratings — full slate played out, not locked to results. AVG = expected wins; W–L = most-likely record.
| # | Team | W–L | PWR | AVG | ≥9 | ≥8 | ≥7 | ≥6 | ≥5 | ≥4 | ≥3 | ≥2 | ≥1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Favorites | |||||||||||||
| 1 | Texas Tech | 7–2 | +9.2 | 6.6 | 6 | 26 | 56 | 81 | 94 | 99 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 2 | BYU | 6–3 | +8.5 | 6.2 | 3 | 18 | 44 | 72 | 90 | 97 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3 | Houston | 6–3 | +4.9 | 5.7 | 1 | 8 | 27 | 55 | 80 | 94 | 99 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Challengers | |||||||||||||
| 4 | Kansas State | 6–3 | +4.7 | 5.8 | 2 | 10 | 31 | 59 | 82 | 95 | 99 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 5 | Utah | 6–3 | +4.2 | 5.5 | 1 | 7 | 24 | 50 | 76 | 92 | 98 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 6 | Arizona | 5–4 | +4.6 | 5.2 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 43 | 70 | 89 | 97 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 7 | Baylor | 5–4 | +3.5 | 5.0 | 3 | 14 | 36 | 63 | 85 | 96 | 99 | ✓ | |
| 8 | Arizona State | 5–4 | +2.1 | 4.7 | 2 | 9 | 28 | 55 | 80 | 94 | 99 | ✓ | |
| The Field | |||||||||||||
| 9 | TCU | 4–5 | +1.0 | 4.3 | 1 | 6 | 20 | 44 | 70 | 89 | 98 | ✓ | |
| 10 | UCF | 4–5 | -3.1 | 4.1 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 38 | 65 | 86 | 97 | ✓ | |
| 11 | Kansas | 4–5 | -2.1 | 4.0 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 36 | 63 | 85 | 96 | ✓ | |
| 12 | Iowa State | 3–6 | -6.5 | 3.4 | 1 | 6 | 20 | 45 | 73 | 92 | 99 | ||
| 13 | Cincinnati | 3–6 | -4.9 | 3.2 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 40 | 68 | 90 | 98 | ||
| Rebuilding | |||||||||||||
| 14 | Colorado | 3–6 | -6.8 | 3.0 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 35 | 63 | 86 | 98 | ||
| 15 | West Virginia | 3–6 | -8.6 | 2.9 | 3 | 12 | 33 | 62 | 86 | 98 | |||
| 16 | Oklahoma State | 2–7 | -11.0 | 2.5 | 1 | 7 | 22 | 49 | 78 | 95 | |||
Six advanced-stat dimensions per team, ranked against all 134 FBS programs, 2026 season. Every column reads higher-is-better. Click a column to sort.
| Team | Scoring | Converts | Defense | Identity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas Tech | +0.24 | 45.1% | -0.07 | Balanced |
BYU | +0.50 | 58.7% | -0.04 | Efficient offense |
Houston | +0.54 | 61.9% | -0.02 | Efficient offense |
Kansas State | +0.38 | 55.7% | +0.21 | Lockdown defense |
Arizona | +0.20 | 51.0% | -0.12 | No explosive plays |
Utah | +0.43 | 54.0% | -0.11 | Efficient offense |
Baylor | +0.20 | 44.0% | +0.11 | High-tempo |
Arizona State | +0.27 | 46.1% | -0.02 | Big-play offense |
TCU | +0.29 | 51.2% | +0.05 | Balanced |
Kansas | +0.35 | 44.4% | -0.01 | Big-play offense |
UCF | +0.24 | 42.1% | +0.08 | Lockdown defense |
Cincinnati | +0.41 | 51.2% | -0.10 | Balanced |
Iowa State | +0.16 | 32.2% | +0.02 | Grind-it-out |
Colorado | +0.26 | 41.8% | -0.02 | Balanced |
West Virginia | +0.29 | 48.6% | -0.05 | Balanced |
Oklahoma State | -0.02 | 40.0% | -0.17 | High-tempo |
Identity is the single dimension where a team is most above or below the FBS average (pace, defense, big plays, or converting drives) — "Balanced" means nothing stands out either way. CFBD 2026 advanced stats, excludes garbage time.
Big 12's highest CFB Index Scores, 2025 season.
| # | Player | Team | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evan JohnsonCB | BYU | #5 of 364 |
| 2 | Jamel JohnsonS | TCU | #5 of 544 |
| 3 | Eric McAlisterWR | TCU | #7 of 485 |
| 4 | Eddie Walls IIIEDGE | Houston | #16 of 420 |
| 5 | John Henry DaleyEDGE | Utah | #17 of 420 |
| 6 | Jay'Vion ColeCB | Arizona | #21 of 364 |
| 7 | LJ MartinRB | BYU | #10 of 326 |
| 8 | Desmond PurnellLB | Kansas State | #31 of 583 |
| 9 | Amare ThomasWR | Houston | #17 of 485 |
| 10 | Blake HeroldIDL | Kansas | #22 of 330 |
Conference strength by RR50 (round-robin adjusted power).
Best available American odds · sportsbook consensus.
| # | Team | Odds |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Texas Tech
|
+100 |
| 2 |
BYU
|
+440 |
| 3 |
Utah
|
+600 |
| 4 |
Kansas State
|
+1100 |
| 5 |
Houston
|
+1100 |
| 6 |
Arizona State
|
+1800 |
| 7 |
Oklahoma State
|
+2000 |
| 8 |
TCU
|
+2500 |
| 9 |
Arizona
|
+2700 |
| 10 |
Baylor
|
+3500 |