Big 12, at a glance.
Top 10 by power rating — 2026 season, through the latest games.
Home Conferences FBS 2026 season
The weekly grind · 2026
Texas Tech holds the Big 12 lead heading into this week's games.
Big 12 carries real selection-room weight with 6 teams inside the top 25 and Texas Tech driving a legitimate national ceiling.
Top 10 by power rating — 2026 season, through the latest games.
The Big 12 absorbed UCF, BYU, Cincinnati, and Houston in 2023, then lost Oklahoma and Texas to the SEC and gained Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado, and Utah in 2024 — three full rounds of realignment that redrew the conference map entirely. Boise State joined from the Mountain West in 2026, completing the post-Pac-12 landscape.




The depth argument for this conference rests on how many credible opponents are clustered behind the leader. The gap between the top and bottom is narrow — a sign of genuine parity.
Texas Tech holds the Big 12 lead heading into this week's games.
The Coaching StoryTexas Tech finished 12-2 in 2025 with a recruiting class ranked #48 nationally — the second-biggest coaching premium in the Big 12 by the numbers. Joey McGuire built a program that wins with scheme and development, not recruiting, in a conference where most programs with that recruiting rank finish 5-7. The Big 12’s best coaching story is happening in Lubbock and most people aren’t watching closely enough.
Why it matters →
The CollapseOklahoma State finished 2025 at 1-11 with a recruiting class ranked #53 nationally. The gap between raw talent and results was the widest in the conference — a program that built its identity on player development and coaching suddenly failing at both. Whether 2026 is a reset or a continued slide is the conference’s most uncomfortable question.
Why it matters →
The Recruiting QuestionTexas holds the #1 recruiting class in the conference entering 2026 — and went 10-3 in 2025, which sounds good until you compare it to what Texas Tech did with the #48 class. The Longhorns’ talent floor is the highest in the league. Whether that translates to a conference title before the 2026 offseason realignment window reshapes the map again is the conference’s defining power-structure question.
Why it matters →Which teams will emerge as the top competitors in Colorado high school football and flag football?
How will Franchione's passing impact the programs he led?
Will Texas Tech be allowed to play Brendan Sorsby this season?
Can Northwestern sustain this level of play after losing key players to the NFL Draft?
Can Cincinnati recover from this loss and regain their offensive momentum?
Where each Big 12 program stands nationally in fan sentiment (100th = most positive in FBS, 0 = least). Conference median: 40th percentile. The label is the band (Bullish, Leaning, Mixed, Souring); the number after it is the change in percentile points since the prior week.
Most volatile: BYU
Fan confidence has swung 74 percentile points in the last 8 weeks — currently at the 16th percentile nationally.
Positive gap means the coaching staff won more than the recruiting class predicted. Data: Big 12 teams, 16 programs.
2026 season, in progress — sorted by power rating. The tag beside a team is its long-run program standing.
| # | Team | Record | Power | Resume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Texas TechPower Program III#24
|
7-1 | +28.7 | +97.9 |
| 2 |
UtahPower Program II#20
|
8-0 | +28.5 | +99.3 |
| 3 |
ArizonaNational Program II#44
|
6-2 | +28.0 | +93.9 |
| 4 |
BaylorNational Program I#33▲
|
5-3 | +27.1 | +86.5 |
| 5 |
BYUPower Program III#31
|
7-1 | +27.0 | +98.4 |
| 6 |
HoustonNational Program I#40
|
6-2 | +26.8 | +96.6 |
| 7 |
TCUPower Program III#26
|
4-4 | +23.1 | +52.0 |
| 8 |
Arizona StateNational Program I#38
|
4-4 | +20.8 | +87.0 |
| 9 |
Kansas StatePower Program III#32
|
4-4 | +20.7 | +45.9 |
| 10 |
KansasNational Program III#68
|
3-5 | +20.4 | +83.1 |
| 11 |
CincinnatiNational Program II#47
|
5-3 | +18.9 | +89.7 |
| 12 |
Oklahoma StateNational Program II#52
|
5-3 | +17.9 | +94.2 |
| 13 |
UCFNational Program II#56▼
|
4-4 | +17.8 | +87.4 |
| 14 |
ColoradoRegional Program II#94
|
3-5 | +16.0 | +87.3 |
| 15 |
Iowa StateNational Program II#45
|
4-4 | +15.4 | +90.0 |
| 16 |
West VirginiaNational Program III#66
|
5-3 | +14.1 | +88.0 |
Projected standings · Big 12 · 2026
Odds of winning at least N conference games from current power ratings — full slate played out, not locked to results. Avg = expected wins; W-L = most-likely record.
| # | Team | W-L | Pwr | Avg | ≥9 | ≥8 | ≥7 | ≥6 | ≥5 | ≥4 | ≥3 | ≥2 | ≥1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Favorites | |||||||||||||
| 1 | Texas Tech | 6-3 | +6.8 | 6.0 | 2 | 14 | 37 | 65 | 86 | 96 | 99 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 2 | Utah | 6-3 | +6.5 | 5.9 | 2 | 12 | 34 | 62 | 84 | 96 | 99 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3 | Arizona | 6-3 | +6.0 | 5.7 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 58 | 82 | 94 | 99 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Challengers | |||||||||||||
| 4 | Houston | 6-3 | +4.9 | 5.6 | 1 | 8 | 26 | 53 | 78 | 93 | 99 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 5 | BYU | 6-3 | +5.0 | 5.5 | 1 | 7 | 24 | 51 | 76 | 92 | 98 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 6 | Baylor | 6-3 | +5.2 | 5.5 | 1 | 7 | 24 | 51 | 76 | 92 | 98 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 7 | TCU | 4-5 | +1.2 | 4.5 | 1 | 8 | 23 | 49 | 75 | 92 | 98 | ✓ | |
| 8 | Arizona State | 4-5 | −1.1 | 4.1 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 39 | 66 | 87 | 97 | ✓ | |
| The field | |||||||||||||
| 9 | Kansas State | 4-5 | −1.2 | 4.4 | 2 | 8 | 23 | 48 | 73 | 91 | 98 | ✓ | |
| 10 | Kansas | 4-5 | −1.5 | 4.1 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 40 | 67 | 87 | 97 | ✓ | |
| 11 | Oklahoma State | 4-5 | −4.0 | 4.0 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 37 | 64 | 85 | 96 | ✓ | |
| 12 | UCF | 4-5 | −4.2 | 3.8 | 3 | 12 | 30 | 57 | 81 | 95 | 99 | ||
| 13 | Cincinnati | 4-5 | −3.1 | 3.7 | 2 | 10 | 28 | 54 | 79 | 94 | 99 | ||
| Rebuilding | |||||||||||||
| 14 | Iowa State | 3-6 | −6.6 | 3.2 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 41 | 69 | 90 | 99 | ||
| 15 | Colorado | 3-6 | −5.9 | 3.1 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 39 | 67 | 88 | 98 | ||
| 16 | West Virginia | 3-6 | −7.8 | 2.8 | 3 | 11 | 30 | 58 | 84 | 97 | |||
Six advanced-stat dimensions per team, ranked against all 134 FBS programs, 2026 season. Every column reads higher-is-better. Click a column to sort.
| Team | Scoring | Converts | Defense | Identity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas Tech | +0.17 | 46.8% | +0.02 | No explosive plays |
Utah | +0.26 | 50.6% | +0.02 | Efficient offense |
Arizona | +0.24 | 47.0% | +0.01 | Balanced |
Baylor | +0.13 | 38.9% | +0.10 | High-tempo |
BYU | +0.23 | 47.3% | −0.03 | Balanced |
Houston | +0.33 | 53.3% | −0.15 | Efficient offense |
TCU | +0.10 | 42.1% | +0.07 | Lockdown defense |
Arizona State | +0.05 | 42.4% | −0.05 | Balanced |
Kansas State | +0.19 | 47.0% | −0.10 | No explosive plays |
Kansas | +0.13 | 42.1% | −0.00 | High-tempo |
Cincinnati | +0.24 | 45.2% | −0.16 | Big-play offense |
Oklahoma State | +0.28 | 51.3% | −0.10 | Efficient offense |
UCF | +0.09 | 40.9% | −0.07 | Balanced |
Colorado | +0.05 | 39.5% | −0.06 | Balanced |
Iowa State | +0.11 | 38.2% | −0.16 | Can't sustain drives |
West Virginia | +0.20 | 43.4% | −0.24 | High-tempo |
Identity is the single dimension where a team is most above or below the FBS average (pace, defense, big plays, or converting drives) — "Balanced" means nothing stands out either way. CFBD 2026 advanced stats, excludes garbage time.
Big 12's highest CFB Zeitgeist Scores, 2026 season so far.
| # | Player | Team | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LaDainian FieldsCB | Oklahoma State | #1 of 344 |
| 2 | Ansel Din-MbuhIDL | TCU | #1 of 300 |
| 3 | Cole TabbRB | Cincinnati | #2 of 330 |
| 4 | Wayshawn ParkerRB | Utah | #5 of 330 |
| 5 | Gavin FreemanWR | Baylor | #10 of 465 |
| 6 | Randon FontenetteS | Colorado | #8 of 537 |
| 7 | Reed HarrisWR | Arizona State | #12 of 465 |
| 8 | Devon JordanCB | Baylor | #12 of 344 |
| 9 | Kari AshleyTE | TCU | #2 of 132 |
| 10 | Gideon LampronLB | Colorado | #19 of 567 |
Conference strength, as a round-robin adjusted power rating.
Best available American odds · sportsbook consensus.
| # | Team | Odds |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Utah
|
+125 |
| 2 |
BYU
|
+220 |
| 3 |
Texas Tech
|
+350 |
| 4 |
Houston
|
+1000 |
| 5 |
Arizona
|
+1375 |
| 6 |
Oklahoma State
|
+1500 |
| 7 |
Baylor
|
+2700 |
| 8 |
Cincinnati
|
+20000 |
| 9 |
TCU
|
+25000 |
| 10 |
Arizona State
|
+40000 |