Home Conferences FBS 2026 season

The weekly grind · 2026

Big 12

The Rebuilt League

Texas Tech holds the Big 12 lead heading into this week's games.

Big 12 carries real selection-room weight with 6 teams inside the top 25 and Texas Tech driving a legitimate national ceiling.

#4Overall
#4In FBS
+21.5Conference strength
+26.0Upper strength
16Teams
6Top-25 teams
Power snapshot Projected 2026 standing

The Rebuilt League

The Big 12 absorbed UCF, BYU, Cincinnati, and Houston in 2023, then lost Oklahoma and Texas to the SEC and gained Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado, and Utah in 2024 — three full rounds of realignment that redrew the conference map entirely. Boise State joined from the Mountain West in 2026, completing the post-Pac-12 landscape.

6 top-25 teams.

The depth argument for this conference rests on how many credible opponents are clustered behind the leader. The gap between the top and bottom is narrow — a sign of genuine parity.

Where things stand right now.

Texas Tech holds the Big 12 lead heading into this week's games.

Tools Matchup simulator Compare teams Playoff forecast Style map Head to head Power map

Texas Tech Went 12-2 With the 48th Recruiting Class

Texas Tech finished 12-2 in 2025 with a recruiting class ranked #48 nationally — the second-biggest coaching premium in the Big 12 by the numbers. Joey McGuire built a program that wins with scheme and development, not recruiting, in a conference where most programs with that recruiting rank finish 5-7. The Big 12’s best coaching story is happening in Lubbock and most people aren’t watching closely enough.

Why it matters →

Oklahoma State Went 1-11 With a Top-50 Class

Oklahoma State finished 2025 at 1-11 with a recruiting class ranked #53 nationally. The gap between raw talent and results was the widest in the conference — a program that built its identity on player development and coaching suddenly failing at both. Whether 2026 is a reset or a continued slide is the conference’s most uncomfortable question.

Why it matters →

Texas Has the Talent. The Results Say Otherwise.

Texas holds the #1 recruiting class in the conference entering 2026 — and went 10-3 in 2025, which sounds good until you compare it to what Texas Tech did with the #48 class. The Longhorns’ talent floor is the highest in the league. Whether that translates to a conference title before the 2026 offseason realignment window reshapes the map again is the conference’s defining power-structure question.

Why it matters →

Active arcs

All arcs →
Fan pulse Last 30 days · 11,024 mentions
18% positive 44% neutral 38% negative
BYU
1,961
↓ negative
Utah
1,673
↓ negative
Arizona State
1,188
↓ negative
Kansas State
968
↓ negative
Texas Tech
908
↓ negative
Kansas
791
↓ negative
Fan confidence by FBS percentile

Where each Big 12 program stands nationally in fan sentiment (100th = most positive in FBS, 0 = least). Conference median: 40th percentile. The label is the band (Bullish, Leaning, Mixed, Souring); the number after it is the change in percentile points since the prior week.

Arizona
Bullish+32
Oklahoma State
Bullish+31
Utah
Leaning+25
Arizona State
Leaning+19
Houston
Leaning-7
Baylor
Mixed0
Iowa State
Mixed-3
Cincinnati
Mixed+13
UCF
Mixed+3
Colorado
Mixed-3
Kansas
Souring+9
TCU
Souring-4
BYU
Souring+5
Kansas State
Souring-12
Texas Tech
Souring-16

Most volatile: BYU

Fan confidence has swung 74 percentile points in the last 8 weeks — currently at the 16th percentile nationally.

Rivalry face-offs

The coaching premium
Recruiting class rank vs. SP+ performance — where coaches add or subtract value
Above line = coaching premium
Below line = underperforming
Gap = recruiting rank minus SP+ rank

Positive gap means the coaching staff won more than the recruiting class predicted. Data: Big 12 teams, 16 programs.

Coaching grades
Coaching premium ↑
Baylor
+34
Arizona
+27
Houston
+18
Utah
+13
Texas
+5
Underperforming ↓
WVU
-97
Iowa St.
-51
Colorado
-34
Arizona
-21
Cincinnati
-15

Standings

2026 season, in progress — sorted by power rating. The tag beside a team is its long-run program standing.

#TeamRecordPowerResume
1 Texas TechPower Program III#24 7-1 +28.7 +97.9
2 UtahPower Program II#20 8-0 +28.5 +99.3
3 ArizonaNational Program II#44 6-2 +28.0 +93.9
4 BaylorNational Program I#33▲ 5-3 +27.1 +86.5
5 BYUPower Program III#31 7-1 +27.0 +98.4
6 HoustonNational Program I#40 6-2 +26.8 +96.6
7 TCUPower Program III#26 4-4 +23.1 +52.0
8 Arizona StateNational Program I#38 4-4 +20.8 +87.0
9 Kansas StatePower Program III#32 4-4 +20.7 +45.9
10 KansasNational Program III#68 3-5 +20.4 +83.1
11 CincinnatiNational Program II#47 5-3 +18.9 +89.7
12 Oklahoma StateNational Program II#52 5-3 +17.9 +94.2
13 UCFNational Program II#56▼ 4-4 +17.8 +87.4
14 ColoradoRegional Program II#94 3-5 +16.0 +87.3
15 Iowa StateNational Program II#45 4-4 +15.4 +90.0
16 West VirginiaNational Program III#66 5-3 +14.1 +88.0

Projected standings · Big 12 · 2026

Win projection

Odds of winning at least N conference games from current power ratings — full slate played out, not locked to results. Avg = expected wins; W-L = most-likely record.

# Team W-L Pwr Avg ≥9≥8≥7≥6≥5≥4≥3≥2≥1
Favorites
1Texas Tech6-3+6.86.02143765869699✓✓
2Utah6-3+6.55.92123462849699✓✓
3Arizona6-3+6.05.71103058829499✓✓
Challengers
4Houston6-3+4.95.6182653789399✓✓
5BYU6-3+5.05.5172451769298✓✓
6Baylor6-3+5.25.5172451769298✓✓
7TCU4-5+1.24.5182349759298✓
8Arizona State4-5−1.14.1151639668797✓
The field
9Kansas State4-5−1.24.4282348739198✓
10Kansas4-5−1.54.1151840678797✓
11Oklahoma State4-5−4.04.0141537648596✓
12UCF4-5−4.23.83123057819599
13Cincinnati4-5−3.13.72102854799499
Rebuilding
14Iowa State3-6−6.63.2151841699099
15Colorado3-6−5.93.1151739678898
16West Virginia3-6−7.82.831130588497

How they play

Six advanced-stat dimensions per team, ranked against all 134 FBS programs, 2026 season. Every column reads higher-is-better. Click a column to sort.

ScoringConvertsBig playsDefensePacePass rate
Team ScoringConvertsBig playsDefensePacePass rate Identity
Texas Tech+0.1746.8%+1.15+0.0268.543.1%No explosive plays
Utah+0.2650.6%+1.26+0.0270.443.9%Efficient offense
Arizona+0.2447.0%+1.30+0.0168.651.7%Balanced
Baylor+0.1338.9%+1.38+0.1078.049.8%High-tempo
BYU+0.2347.3%+1.22−0.0362.543.6%Balanced
Houston+0.3353.3%+1.13−0.1570.442.8%Efficient offense
TCU+0.1042.1%+1.27+0.0766.950.5%Lockdown defense
Arizona State+0.0542.4%+1.20−0.0569.251.4%Balanced
Kansas State+0.1947.0%+1.15−0.1070.846.6%No explosive plays
Kansas+0.1342.1%+1.41−0.0073.141.4%High-tempo
Cincinnati+0.2445.2%+1.44−0.1665.941.9%Big-play offense
Oklahoma State+0.2851.3%+1.19−0.1072.449.9%Efficient offense
UCF+0.0940.9%+1.25−0.0764.448.4%Balanced
Colorado+0.0539.5%+1.26−0.0669.147.9%Balanced
Iowa State+0.1138.2%+1.32−0.1662.541.4%Can't sustain drives
West Virginia+0.2043.4%+1.32−0.2474.827.4%High-tempo

Identity is the single dimension where a team is most above or below the FBS average (pace, defense, big plays, or converting drives) — "Balanced" means nothing stands out either way. CFBD 2026 advanced stats, excludes garbage time.

Top players

Big 12's highest CFB Zeitgeist Scores, 2026 season so far.

#PlayerTeamNational
1LaDainian FieldsCBOklahoma State#1 of 344
2Ansel Din-MbuhIDLTCU#1 of 300
3Cole TabbRBCincinnati#2 of 330
4Wayshawn ParkerRBUtah#5 of 330
5Gavin FreemanWRBaylor#10 of 465
6Randon FontenetteSColorado#8 of 537
7Reed HarrisWRArizona State#12 of 465
8Devon JordanCBBaylor#12 of 344
9Kari AshleyTETCU#2 of 132
10Gideon LampronLBColorado#19 of 567

Where Big 12 stands nationally

Conference strength, as a round-robin adjusted power rating.

1 SEC SEC
+24.4
2 B10 Big Ten
+23.3
3 IND FBS Independents
+21.7
4 B12 Big 12
+21.5
5 P12 Pac-12
+20.8
6 ACC ACC
+20.5
7 AAC American Athletic
+18.3
8 SB Sun Belt
+17.3
9 MW Mountain West
+16.5
10 CUSA Conference USA
+16.4

The Big 12 in History

Realignment, in order, in History