Rutgers
0-2Big Ten · Greg Schiano, year 7 (31-43) · SHI Stadium · 52,454 · 42,454 avg in 2026
LastL 21–28 at Boston College · Fri Sep 11 · Moses Walker 1 sacks, 1 TFL, 2 INT
Nextvs USC · Sat Sep 19 · 3:30 pm ET · SHI Stadium · USC by 24.5 · series 0-1 · Game preview
Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2
All 87 stats
FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs
| Player | # | G | Cmp/Att | Pct | Yds | Y/A | TD | INT | Rate | ZPR | QBR | Adj ANY/A | Sack% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.09 EPA/play | 10 | 2 | 24 / 36 | 66.7 | 307 | 8.5 | 4 #36 FBS | 4 | 152.7 | — | 57.1 | — | — | |
Yards by week → | ||||||||||||||
| +0.06 EPA/play | 12 | 1 | 16 / 29 | 55.2 | 242 | 8.3 | 2 | 3 | 127.3 | — | 20.4 | — | — | |
Yards by week → | ||||||||||||||
| Player | # | G | Car | Yds | Avg | TD | Long | Stuff% | 10+% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced Back · +0.03 EPA/play | 3 | 2 | 41 | 176 #35 FBS | 4.3 | 0 | 22 | — | — | |
Yards by week → Balanced BackPlays within the scheme — consistent production without a dominant dimension. The most common profile in its group this season — 6 of 15 classified this way. Played in 2 of 3 games this season · junior · 3-star, 2024 class View Antwan Raymond's full player page | ||||||||||
| Player | # | G | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | Long | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Threat · +1.17 EPA/play | 8 | 2 | 17 | 333 #2 FBS | 19.6 | 5 #1 FBS | 78 | |
Yards by week → Deep Threat· Boom-or-bustStretches the field vertically. Every snap is a potential big play. his yards come in chunks — feast or famine National watch / fringe All-American — on the edge of a 1st-team nod. 11 of 58 WRs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt Yards / reception18.7 90th percentile · FBS WRs, min. 12 receptions TD rate29.4% 98th percentile · FBS WRs, min. 12 receptions Trait fingerprint Plays like View KJ Duff's full player page | ||||||||
| +0.13 EPA/play | 4 | 2 | 9 | 82 | 9.1 | 0 | 21 | |
Yards by week → | ||||||||
| Player | # | G | Tot | Solo | TFL | Sack | Hur |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Player | # | G | Tot | Solo | Ast | TFL | Sack | PD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 #5 FBS | |
| 10 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Player | # | G | Tot | PD | INT | TFL | Sack |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Player | # | G | No | Yds | Avg | Long | In20 | TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | 2 | 5 | 220 | 44 | 50 | 1 | 0 |
Net average is unavailable — CFBD's punting feed carries gross yards only, with no return-yardage or touchback deduction.
2026 stat leaders · Rutgers
through 2 gamesKJ Duff leads Rutgers with 333 receiving yards through 2 games.
Rutgers fields a strong methodical, ball-control offense behind a porous, gives up the big play defense.
Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.
Rutgers reads strongest in success rate (top 21%) and passing epa (top 26%); the crux lives in rushing epa allowed, where Rutgers sits at the 1st percentile.
offense · strengths lead
defense · higher bar = harder to play against
hidden math · special situations
Home-field advantage · Rutgers · 2018–present · FBS opponents
Rutgers is worth +2.4 points more at home than on the road.
Bottom third of FBS, 23rd percentile of 133 programs
33% at home, 31% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (16–33 home, 13–29 away). Interval ±4.4.
Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, Rutgers has beaten the number by +1.2 more at home than away over 74 games — inside the ±6.9 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.
SHI Stadium seats 52,454 and has averaged 93% full (48,975, 27 games reported). Visitors cover a median 496 miles to get here since 2018 — 51st-longest of 135 FBS venues, inside the ordinary range. For the home side it is genuinely home ground: 43% of the 2026 roster (53 of 124 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.
Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 53 home games since 2018.
More in this tab
Scheme claims
Fourth-quarter reliability, corrected
Rutgers's 4th-quarter offense, before and after garbage time
Raw Q4 EPA/play ranks 80th percentile in FBS. Strip out snaps taken with a blowout margin and it drops to the 54th — the correction is the finding, not a footnote.
Standard downs vs. passing downs
Does Rutgers hold up once the down-and-distance turns against them?
30th percentile success on standard downs, 71st on passing downs — a 41-point gap between the two.
View all FBS teams as a table
| Team | Standard-downs percentile | Passing-downs percentile |
|---|---|---|
| App State | 44th | 90th |
| Arizona | 92nd | 86th |
| Arkansas | 60th | 80th |
| Auburn | 75th | 55th |
| Ball State | 12th | 24th |
| Baylor | 40th | 96th |
| Boise State | 58th | 46th |
| Boston College | 27th | 56th |
| Buffalo | 7th | 14th |
| California | 9th | 25th |
| Central Michigan | 16th | 6th |
| Charlotte | 73rd | 83rd |
| Clemson | 1st | 19th |
| Coastal Carolina | 61st | 52nd |
| Colorado | 35th | 77th |
| Colorado State | 82nd | 91st |
| Delaware | 70th | 31st |
| Duke | 20th | 29th |
| Eastern Michigan | 52nd | 10th |
| Florida Atlantic | 43rd | 87th |
| Florida International | 46th | 43rd |
| Florida State | 28th | 65th |
| Georgia Southern | 24th | 45th |
| Georgia Tech | 58th | 44th |
| Hawai'i | 18th | 41st |
| Iowa State | 4th | 23rd |
| Jacksonville State | 65th | 82nd |
| Kansas | 70th | 35th |
| LSU | 33rd | 98th |
| Liberty | 14th | 59th |
| Louisiana | 19th | 92nd |
| Louisville | 96th | 70th |
| Memphis | 69th | 65th |
| Michigan | 2nd | 62nd |
| Michigan State | 62nd | 29th |
| Middle Tennessee | 87th | 68th |
| Missouri | 36th | 85th |
| Navy | 98th | 59th |
| Nevada | 77th | 52nd |
| New Mexico State | 45th | 75th |
| Norfolk State | 16th | 9th |
| North Dakota State | 86th | 27th |
| North Texas | 49th | 68th |
| Ohio | 38th | 17th |
| Ohio State | 90th | 40th |
| Oklahoma State | 41st | 49th |
| Ole Miss | 94th | 50th |
| Oregon | 35th | 33rd |
| Oregon State | 10th | 38th |
| Pittsburgh | 30th | 76th |
| Purdue | 83rd | 88th |
| Rutgers | 30th | 71st |
| Sacramento State | 23rd | 14th |
| Sam Houston | 78th | 61st |
| San Diego State | 4th | 40th |
| San José State | 54th | 22nd |
| South Alabama | 50th | 73rd |
| South Florida | 91st | 52nd |
| Stanford | 76th | 15th |
| Syracuse | 48th | 64th |
| TCU | 93rd | 8th |
| Tennessee | 65th | 78th |
| Texas | 72nd | 94th |
| Texas A&M | 85th | 72nd |
| Texas Tech | 88th | 48th |
| Troy | 22nd | 59th |
| Tulane | 31st | 2nd |
| Tulsa | 56th | 1st |
| UAB | 65th | 81st |
| UNLV | 51st | 7th |
| USC | 97th | 99th |
| UTSA | 99th | 29th |
| Utah State | 4th | 93rd |
| Vanderbilt | 80th | 12th |
| Wake Forest | 56th | 97th |
| Washington | 81st | 4th |
| Washington State | 8th | 3rd |
| Western Kentucky | 25th | 34th |
| Western Michigan | 39th | 20th |
| Wisconsin | 13th | 18th |
| Wyoming | 65th | 36th |
Halftime identity
Rutgers by half
1st-half offense ranks 14th percentile in FBS; 2nd-half, 16th — competitive snaps only, garbage time excluded from both halves.
Tendency drift
Season by season
How Rutgers’s current staff calls plays, year over year
Ratings
Comparable teams
Most similar programs · Rutgers
Reads like
Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.
Conditions
63°F average kickoff temp; 8% of games had measurable precipitation; 7 mph average wind.
Based on 78 home games with weather data.