Pac-12, at a glance.
Top 10 by power rating — 2026 season, through the latest games.
Home Conferences FBS 2026 season
VERDICT BEGINS · 2026
The 2026 Pac-12 season is underway — Boise State holds the early power lead, but the picture is still open.
Pac-12 reads like a weekly gauntlet. The middle of the league is strong enough that contenders do not get many breathers.
Top 10 by power rating — 2026 season, through the latest games.
Oregon went 13-2 in 2025 and holds the Pac-12's highest SP+ rating (#6 nationally) entering 2026. Meanwhile, Colorado went 3-9 with a recruiting class ranked #37 — the conference's largest coaching gap (-76). UCLA finished 3-9 with a #46 class (-73 gap). The Pac-12 has a genuine national title contender at the top and a credibility crisis at the bottom, with almost nothing in between.




The depth argument for this conference rests on how many credible opponents are clustered behind the leader. The gap between the top and bottom is narrow — a sign of genuine parity.
The 2026 Pac-12 season is underway — Boise State holds the early power lead, but the picture is still open.
The ContenderOregon went 13-2 in 2025 with a recruiting class ranked #5 nationally — the only Pac-12 program that can claim elite talent AND elite results. Their SP+ rating of #6 puts them in the conversation with Georgia, Ohio State, and the conference's strongest programs nationally. If the Pac-12 is going to earn CFP credibility, Oregon is the argument. Whether the conference's bottom tier holds them back in the committee room is the one thing they can't control.
Why it matters →
The Coaching StoryUtah's coaching premium is +31: a #40 recruiting class produced an 11-2 season and an SP+ ranking of #9 nationally. Kyle Whittingham's program has operated this way for a decade — winning more games than their talent should allow, competing in January, and never landing a top-20 recruiting class. If Utah beats Oregon in 2026, they become the Pac-12's most interesting program.
Why it matters →
The QuestionColorado's coaching gap is -76: a #37 recruiting class produced a 3-9 season and an SP+ ranking of #113. That's the Pac-12's worst ratio of talent to results — and among the worst in FBS. UCLA runs a similar problem (-73 gap, 3-9). Stanford went 4-8 with a #56 class (-48). The Pac-12's bottom tier is recruiting Power Four talent and losing like a Group of Five program, which is its own kind of crisis.
Why it matters →Can Arkansas State recover from a strong opening loss?
Can Colorado State overcome its personnel changes to compete with Boise State?
Can Fresno State's young team compete with a ranked USC squad in their first game of the season?
Will Arch Manning's pregame mishap affect his performance against Texas State?
How will these teams perform in their renewed rivalry?
Where each Pac-12 program stands nationally in fan sentiment (100th = most positive in FBS, 0 = least). Conference median: 46th percentile.
Most volatile: Texas State
Fan confidence has swung 58 percentile points in the last 8 weeks — currently at the 3rd percentile nationally.
Positive gap means the coaching staff won more than the recruiting class predicted. Data: Pac-12 teams, 8 programs.
2026 season, in progress — sorted by power rating. Stature tag = interim Zeitgeist calibration (medium confidence).
| # | Team | Record | RR50 | Resume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Boise StatePower Program III#25
|
1-1 | +23.5 | +92.8 |
| 2 |
Texas StateRegional Program III#101
|
0-2 | +23.2 | +39.8 |
| 3 |
Washington StateRegional Program I#80
|
0-2 | +22.0 | +18.0 |
| 4 |
San Diego StateRegional Program I#77
|
1-1 | +21.6 | +23.8 |
| 5 |
Utah StateRegional Program III#102
|
0-2 | +20.2 | +31.1 |
| 6 |
Fresno StateNational Program III#62
|
1-1 | +20.1 | +51.6 |
| 7 |
Oregon StateRegional Program I#85
|
0-2 | +19.4 | +66.9 |
| 8 |
Colorado StateRegional Program IV#120
|
2-0 | +17.2 | +93.4 |
Projected Standings · Pac-12 · 2026
Odds of winning at least N conference games from current power ratings — full slate played out, not locked to results. AVG = expected wins; W–L = most-likely record.
| # | Team | W–L | PWR | AVG | ≥7 | ≥6 | ≥5 | ≥4 | ≥3 | ≥2 | ≥1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Favorites | |||||||||||
| 1 | Boise State | 4–3 | +2.6 | 4.0 | 2 | 13 | 37 | 66 | 88 | 98 | ✓ |
| 2 | Texas State | 4–3 | +2.3 | 4.0 | 2 | 12 | 35 | 65 | 87 | 97 | ✓ |
| Challengers | |||||||||||
| 3 | San Diego State | 4–3 | +0.7 | 3.7 | 1 | 8 | 27 | 56 | 82 | 95 | 99 |
| 4 | Washington State | 4–3 | +1.1 | 3.6 | 1 | 7 | 26 | 54 | 81 | 95 | 99 |
| The Field | |||||||||||
| 5 | Utah State | 3–4 | -0.7 | 3.3 | 4 | 18 | 44 | 73 | 92 | 99 | |
| 6 | Fresno State | 3–4 | -0.8 | 3.3 | 4 | 18 | 43 | 73 | 92 | 99 | |
| Rebuilding | |||||||||||
| 7 | Oregon State | 3–4 | -1.5 | 3.3 | 4 | 18 | 43 | 72 | 92 | 99 | |
| 8 | Colorado State | 3–4 | -3.7 | 2.8 | 2 | 9 | 28 | 57 | 84 | 97 | |
Six advanced-stat dimensions per team, ranked against all 134 FBS programs, 2026 season. Every column reads higher-is-better. Click a column to sort.
| Team | Scoring | Converts | Defense | Identity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Boise State | +0.28 | 42.9% | -0.17 | Balanced |
Texas State | +0.16 | 44.3% | -0.35 | Defense is the problem |
Washington State | -0.08 | 28.3% | -0.13 | Grind-it-out |
San Diego State | +0.07 | 38.4% | -0.08 | No explosive plays |
Utah State | +0.04 | 36.9% | -0.04 | Can't sustain drives |
Fresno State | +0.03 | 35.0% | -0.14 | Grind-it-out |
Oregon State | +0.23 | 35.1% | -0.25 | Big-play offense |
Colorado State | +0.40 | 48.9% | -0.06 | Big-play offense |
Identity is the single dimension where a team is most above or below the FBS average (pace, defense, big plays, or converting drives) — "Balanced" means nothing stands out either way. CFBD 2026 advanced stats, excludes garbage time.
Pac-12's highest CFB Index Scores, 2025 season.
| # | Player | Team | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caleb FranclLB | Washington State | #60 of 583 |
| 2 | Bryson LambIDL | Washington State | #62 of 330 |
| 3 | Trent WalkerWR | Oregon State | #75 of 485 |
| 4 | Parker McKennaLB | Washington State | #134 of 583 |
| 5 | Jaheim PattersonS | Oregon State | #115 of 544 |
| 6 | Isaac TerrellEDGE | Washington State | #109 of 420 |
| 7 | Josh MeredithWR | Washington State | #96 of 485 |
| 8 | Skyler ThomasS | Oregon State | #125 of 544 |
| 9 | Buddha PeletiEDGE | Washington State | #166 of 420 |
| 10 | Colby HumphreyCB | Washington State | #144 of 364 |
Conference strength by RR50 (round-robin adjusted power).