Pac-12, at a glance.
Top 10 by power rating — 2026 season, through the latest games.
Home Conferences FBS 2026 season
The weekly grind · 2026
Boise State holds the Pac-12 lead heading into this week's games.
Pac-12 looks stronger on team quality than on season resume, which makes it a dangerous future-facing league.
Top 10 by power rating — 2026 season, through the latest games.
Oregon went 13-2 in 2025 and holds the Pac-12's highest SP+ rating (#6 nationally) entering 2026. Meanwhile, Colorado went 3-9 with a recruiting class ranked #37 — the conference's largest coaching gap (-76). UCLA finished 3-9 with a #46 class (-73 gap). The Pac-12 has a genuine national title contender at the top and a credibility crisis at the bottom, with almost nothing in between.




The depth argument for this conference rests on how many credible opponents are clustered behind the leader. The gap between the top and bottom is narrow — a sign of genuine parity.
Boise State holds the Pac-12 lead heading into this week's games.
The ContenderOregon went 13-2 in 2025 with a recruiting class ranked #5 nationally — the only Pac-12 program that can claim elite talent AND elite results. Their SP+ rating of #6 puts them in the conversation with Georgia, Ohio State, and the conference’s strongest programs nationally. If the Pac-12 is going to earn CFP credibility, Oregon is the argument. Whether the conference’s bottom tier holds them back in the committee room is the one thing they can’t control.
Why it matters →
The Coaching StoryUtah’s coaching premium is +31: a #40 recruiting class produced an 11-2 season and an SP+ ranking of #9 nationally. Kyle Whittingham’s program has operated this way for a decade — winning more games than their talent should allow, competing in January, and never landing a top-20 recruiting class. If Utah beats Oregon in 2026, they become the Pac-12’s most interesting program.
Why it matters →
The QuestionColorado’s coaching gap is -76: a #37 recruiting class produced a 3-9 season and an SP+ ranking of #113. That’s the Pac-12’s worst ratio of talent to results — and among the worst in FBS. UCLA runs a similar problem (-73 gap, 3-9). Stanford went 4-8 with a #56 class (-48). The Pac-12’s bottom tier is recruiting Power Four talent and losing like a Group of Five program, which is its own kind of crisis.
Why it matters →Can Boise State sustain its momentum following this strong start to the 2026 season?
How will Colorado State's roster moves impact their performance against Boise State?
How will the mumps outbreak affect San Diego State's performance in their Pac-12 opener?
Will Kirby Moore’s switch to play-calling improve Washington State’s struggling offense?
Can Fresno State sustain its defensive dominance in future Pac-12 matchups?
Where each Pac-12 program stands nationally in fan sentiment (100th = most positive in FBS, 0 = least). Conference median: 31st percentile. The label is the band (Bullish, Leaning, Mixed, Souring); the number after it is the change in percentile points since the prior week.
Most volatile: San Diego State
Fan confidence has swung 87 percentile points in the last 8 weeks — currently at the 1st percentile nationally.
Positive gap means the coaching staff won more than the recruiting class predicted. Data: Pac-12 teams, 8 programs.
2026 season, in progress — sorted by power rating. The tag beside a team is its long-run program standing.
| # | Team | Record | Power | Resume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Boise StatePower Program III#23
|
7-1 | +28.7 | +99.1 |
| 2 |
Texas StateRegional Program III#93
|
4-4 | +25.1 | +81.3 |
| 3 |
Oregon StateRegional Program I#73
|
5-3 | +23.9 | +91.0 |
| 4 |
Fresno StateNational Program III#61▲
|
5-3 | +22.3 | +87.1 |
| 5 |
Utah StateRegional Program III#99
|
3-5 | +20.9 | +60.0 |
| 6 |
San Diego StateRegional Program I#80
|
4-5 | +17.6 | +43.0 |
| 7 |
Washington StateRegional Program I#82
|
1-8 | +17.2 | +33.4 |
| 8 |
Colorado StateRegional Program IV#117
|
3-5 | +15.2 | +71.2 |
Projected standings · Pac-12 · 2026
Odds of winning at least N conference games from current power ratings — full slate played out, not locked to results. Avg = expected wins; W-L = most-likely record.
| # | Team | W-L | Pwr | Avg | ≥7 | ≥6 | ≥5 | ≥4 | ≥3 | ≥2 | ≥1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Favorites | |||||||||||
| 1 | Boise State | 5-2 | +7.3 | 4.8 | 7 | 31 | 63 | 87 | 97 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 2 | Texas State | 4-3 | +3.7 | 4.2 | 2 | 15 | 42 | 72 | 92 | 99 | ✓ |
| Challengers | |||||||||||
| 3 | Oregon State | 4-3 | +2.5 | 4.0 | 2 | 12 | 36 | 66 | 88 | 98 | ✓ |
| 4 | Fresno State | 4-3 | +1.0 | 3.6 | 1 | 7 | 25 | 54 | 81 | 95 | 99 |
| The field | |||||||||||
| 5 | Utah State | 3-4 | −0.4 | 3.4 | 4 | 19 | 46 | 75 | 93 | 99 | |
| 6 | San Diego State | 3-4 | −3.7 | 2.9 | 2 | 10 | 31 | 61 | 87 | 98 | |
| Rebuilding | |||||||||||
| 7 | Washington State | 3-4 | −4.2 | 2.7 | 1 | 8 | 25 | 55 | 83 | 97 | |
| 8 | Colorado State | 2-5 | −6.1 | 2.4 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 44 | 75 | 95 | |
Six advanced-stat dimensions per team, ranked against all 134 FBS programs, 2026 season. Every column reads higher-is-better. Click a column to sort.
| Team | Scoring | Converts | Defense | Identity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Boise State | +0.31 | 47.1% | −0.06 | Balanced |
Texas State | +0.27 | 48.7% | −0.12 | High-tempo |
Oregon State | +0.30 | 49.2% | −0.07 | Efficient offense |
Fresno State | +0.11 | 39.2% | −0.03 | Balanced |
Utah State | +0.02 | 36.5% | −0.04 | Can't sustain drives |
San Diego State | +0.00 | 36.8% | −0.14 | Can't sustain drives |
Washington State | −0.05 | 35.5% | −0.10 | Can't sustain drives |
Colorado State | +0.22 | 45.5% | −0.31 | Defense is the problem |
Identity is the single dimension where a team is most above or below the FBS average (pace, defense, big plays, or converting drives) — "Balanced" means nothing stands out either way. CFBD 2026 advanced stats, excludes garbage time.
Pac-12's highest CFB Zeitgeist Scores, 2026 season so far.
| # | Player | Team | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jesse LegreeWR | Oregon State | #3 of 465 |
| 2 | Carson TujagueIDL | Utah State | #2 of 300 |
| 3 | Dylan RileyRB | Boise State | #4 of 330 |
| 4 | Carl NesmithLB | Utah State | #10 of 567 |
| 5 | Takari HickleLB | Oregon State | #14 of 567 |
| 6 | Torrance Burgess Jr.RB | Texas State | #7 of 330 |
| 7 | Jirah LeaupepeteleIDL | Washington State | #15 of 300 |
| 8 | Tyree MorrisIDL | Utah State | #18 of 300 |
| 9 | Mike LindsayCB | San Diego State | #23 of 344 |
| 10 | Brevin HamblinS | Utah State | #22 of 537 |
Conference strength, as a round-robin adjusted power rating.
Realignment, in order, in History; The 2023 Pac-12 is in the Atlas