CFB Zeitgeist Score
61
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 95th percentile.
Isaiah Horton
Isaiah Horton arrives at Alabama with a new fit to prove and an old chapter behind him.
Rival fans bring him up unprompted, and rarely to praise him.
Minority viewA vocal minority sees it the other way.
AI narrative · updated 2026-06-22 · compiled from CFB Zeitgeist data
Where He Ended Up · Transfer
Transferred to Texas A&M
WR · ALABAMA · SEC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
61
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 95th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#200
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP WR AWARD
Biletnikoff
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2022–2025Up 8417% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No recruiting profile is on file for this player. | ||
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Alabama -> Texas A&M | 4-star | 0.9600 | Immediate |
| 2025 | Miami -> Alabama | 4-star | 0.9100 | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
75
Grounded Optimism
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
Only 2 rival mention(s) — below the 4-mention floor for a defensible read.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
8
count
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#23 of 531 All FBS WRs in receiving TDs — 8 TDs on 42 receptions.
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=42 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 14 at Auburn — 3 receiving_tds
Result W 27-20
The week the volume broke through — stacked 3 td at Auburn.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
✓ Hit 8 receiving TDs · finished with 8.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Isaiah Horton's story is about how role and output meet each other. For Alabama, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Receiving weapon against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 14 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | L 17-31@ Florida State | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 | |
| Wk 2 | W 73-0vs UL Monroe | 3 | 51 | 17.0 | 1 | 29 | |
| Wk 3 | W 38-14vs Wisconsin | 5 | 48 | 9.6 | 1 | 13 | |
| Wk 5 | W 24-21@ Georgia | 5 | 65 | 13.0 | 1 | 24 | |
| Wk 6 | W 30-14vs Vanderbilt | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 0 | 35 | Season-high 66 yds |
| Wk 7 | W 27-24@ Missouri | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 1 | 16 | |
| Wk 8 | W 37-20vs Tennessee | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 1 | 2 | |
| Wk 11 | W 20-9vs LSU | 2 | 26 | 13.0 | 0 | 21 | |
| Wk 12 | L 21-23vs Oklahoma | 3 | 56 | 18.7 | 0 | 26 | |
| Wk 13 | W 56-0vs Eastern Illinois | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 0 | 17 | |
| Wk 14 | W 27-20@ Auburn | 5 | 35 | 7.0 | 3 | 16 | 3 TD catches |
| Wk 15 | L 7-28vs Georgia | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 | |
| Bowl | W 34-24@ Oklahoma | 5 | 65 | 13.0 | 0 | 37 | |
| Bowl | L 3-38@ Indiana | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | 10 | |
| Total | 42 | 511 | 11.5 | 8 | 37 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The player's share of a team's passing-game involvement. It is the fastest way to see whether the receiver is a true focal point or more of a complementary piece.
A blended workload view that accounts for catches, designed touches, and any return-game involvement that shapes the overall profile.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 42 | #175/1110 | 84th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 511 | #213/1107 | 81st pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 8 | #23/1111 | 98th pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 12.2 | #532/1106 | 52nd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Pass share | 11.1% | #436/1137 | 62nd pct | Air-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 37 | #499/1105 | 55th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 10.4% | #213/1137 | 81st pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 7.9% | #378/1137 | 67th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 6.6% | #338/1137 | 70th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Role share | 6.0% | #363/1137 | 68th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 4.4% | #493/1137 | 57th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 4.1% | #509/1137 | 55th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Rush share | 0.0% | #391/1137 | 66th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS WR |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 14 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home8g | 2.6 | 36.2 | 12.9 | 0.4 |
| Road6g | 3.5 | 36.8 | 9.7 | 0.8 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins10g | 3.5 | 42.1 | 11.7 | 0.8 |
| Losses4g | 1.8 | 22.5 | 11.2 | 0.0 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-78g | 3.5 | 43.9 | 11.8 | 0.5 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 2.3 | 26.7 | 11.2 | 0.7 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the WR cohort
Elite: rec tds (94th). Concern: long catch (24th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · WR · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Wins contested catches at the goal line. Size and catch radius are the weapons.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Art Green’s 2020 season.
Art Green
Denzel Boston
Denzel Boston
Jason Brownlee
Dane Key
Matches Art on
Differs from Art on
Through 3 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Anthony Schwartz’s path through Auburn.
Anthony Schwartz
Ma'jon Wright
Matt Sykes
Ramaud Chiaokhiao-Bowman
Tyler Vaughns
Matches Anthony on
As a senior, his production profile tracks closest to Denzel Boston's senior season at Washington (2025).
Denzel Boston
Elijah Arroyo
Will Sheppard
Christian Fitzpatrick
Nick Nash
Matches Denzel on
Differs from Denzel on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Kalen DeBoer
Pass share
53.4%
523 pass / 456 run
Plays / game
65.3
15 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
6.8%
384 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2022–2025
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Nick Saban → Kalen DeBoer. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.