ULM

0-2

Sun Belt · Bryant Vincent, year 3 (8-18) · Malone Stadium · 27,617

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#131 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #138 (-33.2) · FPI #137
The marketno line yetvs SE Louisiana · our model 60% ULM · a number, not a pick

LastL 20–26 at UAB · Sat Sep 12 · Carl Fauntroy Jr. 1 sacks, 1 TFL, 1 INT

Nextvs SE Louisiana · Sat Sep 19 · 4:30 pm ET · Malone Stadium · series 3-6, won the last 2 · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

ULM · 2026 schedule & results0-2
WkDateUsOppLineOpponentResultRecordConf
1Sep 5#153#132+28.5@Mississippi StateL 13–62 1470-10-0
2Sep 12#163#55+9.5@UABL 20–26 1310-20-0
3Sep 19#161#152SE Louisiana
4Sep 26#161#110Florida Atlantic
5Oct 3@South Alabama
7Oct 17Louisiana Tech
8Oct 24@Troy
9Oct 31Southern Miss
10Nov 7@Arkansas State
11Nov 13Louisiana
12Nov 21@App State
13Nov 28Marshall
Advanced box score (EPA, success rate, explosiveness)
DateOppResultYdsTOTOPEPA/playSuccess%Explosive%Note
Sep 12@UABL 20–26257128:07-0.09244.4%78.3%
Sep 5@Mississippi StateL 13–62278031:47-0.02529.6%105.3%
Season average (2 games)2680.5-0.05937.0%91.8%
Verdict Begins·Live

ULM is the north-Louisiana program that walked into Little Rock and stunned #8 Arkansas in overtime — one perfect Saturday it has spent a decade-plus trying to feel again.

Standard GapA 1987 FCS national title and the 'Shock in Little Rock' vs a modern rea…

ULM fans know the power-conference programs schedule them as a paycheck and a guaranteed win — and they'll remind you the Warhawks once cashed that check the other way, walking into an SEC stadium and…

low signal
Read the full program story ↓

The season in chapters

Weeks 1–20-2, all on the roadL 13–62 at Mississippi State · Sat Sep 5
Ahead
Thu Nov 12Battle on the Bayouvs Louisiana · at home

What it is like to watch them2025 · 3-9 · last season

Game feel48rock fightscombined pts / game13th highest-scoring of 14 in the Sun Belt
Heart rate1-1some dramain one-score games (2 of 12)10th most one-score games of 14 in the Sun Belt
Margin-15.3outgunnedavg scoring margin13th best margin of 14 in the Sun Belt
Tempo61methodicaloffensive plays / game14th fastest of 14 in the Sun Belt
Big plays1.40highlight reelexplosiveness (IsoPPP)1st most explosive of 14 in the Sun Belt
Home crowd17,486avg attendance11th biggest crowds of 14 in the Sun Belt

✓ measured from 12 games · ranks are among Sun Belt teams the same season

Recent form · last 10 games · incl. 2025

ULM has lost five straight.

Hibernating. 0-10 over the last 10, and lost the last ten.

Streak L10Last 5 · 0-5Last 10 · 0-10
The forecast

Next Sep 19

vs SE Louisiana · at home

PoorExplosive, big-playSoft

~ our read on style

Market outlook

Season expectations

CFP championship#130 in field+100000
Sun Belt title#13 in market+7000

Sportsbook consensus · best odds across multiple books · 2026-09-14

UL Monroe · the story right now 6 storylines developing

What UL Monroe's offseason is really about

the open questionwhere does it go from here?

deep threatthis cycle~attributednew

Jonathan Bibbs is a real deep-ball threat -- a high share of his targets come on throws past the sticks.

our readbackground

deep threat2025 cycle~attributednew

JP Coulter is a real deep-ball threat -- a high share of his targets come on throws past the sticks.

our readbackground

garbage time2025 cycle~attributednew

Zachary Palmer-Smith does NOT see a usage spike in garbage time -- his workload holds steady regardless of score.

our readbackground

program_outlook2025 cycle~readnew

UL Monroe enters 2025 at No. 131 in SP+ — the 9-spot drop under Bryant Vincent raises one question: how to overcome top-quintile production losses.

what happenedUL Monroe enters 2025 rated No. 131 in SP+ (-21.6), down 9 spots from 2024. ✓ fact
the contexttop-quintile returning production in FBS — 1% of production comes back

our readbackground

program_outlookthis cycle~readnew

UL Monroe enters 2026 — the 3-9 record and 1% returning production contrast sharply with the 2012 Alabama upset that defined its identity, raising questions about whether the program can.

what happenedUL Monroe enters 2026 rated No. 131 in 2025 SP+ (-21.6), down 9 spots from 2024. ✓ fact
the contexttop-quintile returning production in FBS — 1% of production comes back

our readbackground

coordinatorsthis cycle~readnew

Bryant Vincent enters his third season at UL Monroe with a 3-9 losing record to overcome, as the program's identity hinges on reclaiming its historic upset legacy and reshaping its struggling units.

what happenedUL Monroe: coordinator change reshaping a unit. ✓ fact

our readdeveloping

How past storylines here turned out

AnsweredUL Monroe's head-coaching hire held for another season.
Died downUL Monroe's defensive coordinator change has died down — no clear next chapter yet.

Outcome band · ULM · 2026

ULM's most likely season is 5-7 — no postseason. The floor is 3-9; the ceiling is 8-5.

Floor3-9No postseason, 2 fewer wins.
Base5-7No postseason.
Ceiling8-5A bowl game.

Floor, base and ceiling come from the season-path projection, which plays out conference title games and the CFP — so a ceiling can run past 12 games.

How the room reactedreal evidence · tap rooms to explore
Following now · UL Monroe · Season outlook Confidence

UL Monroe is near the bottom of the model. The math is the story.

UL Monroe enters 2025 rated No. 131 in SP+ (-21.6), down 9 spots from 2024. It is top-quintile returning production in FBS — 1% of production comes back. SP+ describes what the program HAS done, not what it will do. The season is the field test. The preview consensus leans in — but preseason ratings reward the recent past, not the season ahead.

CFB Zeitgeist Read · our take
UL Monroe enters 2025 at No. 131 in SP+ — the 9-spot drop under Bryant Vincent raises one question: how to overcome top-quintile production losses.
Source of record: UL Monroe enters 2025 rated No. 131 in SP+ (-21.6), down 9 spots from 2024 — top-quintile returning production in FBS — 1% of production comes back.
How each room is reacting — tap to expand
Believers bullishSkeptics no dissent
📣Believers1 bullish items -- the case it's working.

The 'the projection is underselling us' read -- fans betting the season beats the preview number.

“Burton, Reid connect on 43-yard TD to send UAB to comeback win against Louisiana Monroe”
foxsports.com · 2026-09-12 · read ↗
“UL Monroe UAB Football”
Bluefield Daily Telegraph · 2026-09-12 · read ↗
“UAB 26-20 UL Monroe (13 Sep, 2026) Game Recap”
ESPN · 2026-09-13 · read ↗
🧐SkepticsNo prominent dissent — the coverage runs one way.

The 'the model has seen the tape' counter -- efficiency ratings reward what a program has actually done, not hope.

Nothing in our corpus yet — this door stays open for when there is.

Following now · UL Monroe · Season outlook Confidence

UL Monroe is near the bottom of the model. The math is the story.

UL Monroe enters 2026 rated No. 131 in 2025 SP+ (-21.6), down 9 spots from 2024. It is top-quintile returning production in FBS — 1% of production comes back. SP+ describes what the program HAS done, not what it will do. The season is the field test. The preview consensus leans in — but preseason ratings reward the recent past, not the season ahead.

CFB Zeitgeist Read · our take
UL Monroe enters 2026 — the 3-9 record and 1% returning production contrast sharply with the 2012 Alabama upset that defined its identity, raising questions about whether the program can.
Source of record: UL Monroe enters 2026 rated No. 131 in 2025 SP+ (-21.6), down 9 spots from 2024 — top-quintile returning production in FBS — 1% of production comes back.
How each room is reacting — tap to expand
Believers bullishSkeptics no dissent
📣Believers1 bullish items -- the case it's working.

The 'the projection is underselling us' read -- fans betting the season beats the preview number.

“Burton, Reid connect on 43-yard TD to send UAB to comeback win against Louisiana Monroe”
foxsports.com · 2026-09-12 · read ↗
“UL Monroe UAB Football”
Bluefield Daily Telegraph · 2026-09-12 · read ↗
“UAB 26-20 UL Monroe (13 Sep, 2026) Game Recap”
ESPN · 2026-09-13 · read ↗
🧐SkepticsNo prominent dissent — the coverage runs one way.

The 'the model has seen the tape' counter -- efficiency ratings reward what a program has actually done, not hope.

Nothing in our corpus yet — this door stays open for when there is.

Rival pulse

Louisiana
Hopeful
+9
Battle on the Bayou
Arkansas State
Uneasy
-14
ASU-ULM

Fan mood index · most recent r/cfb data

More in this tab

Game dayWhat a Saturday in this stadium actually feels like.
The experience

ULM is the Sun Belt program whose 2007 program rename + 2012 Arkansas upset (plus a real 2007 upset of Alabama, 21-14) + Malone Stadium identity define what Monroe-North-Louisiana-football looks like.

Offense: PoorTempo: Explosive, big-playDefense: Soft
Open questionsThe unresolved questions this season keeps asking.
RosterWho's gone, who's back, who replaces them.

Roster Reload - ULM

2026 snapshot - 2026-09-15
Returning Production39%Low continuity / heavy reload
Talent Composite#132 nationally247 composite 505.5
Portal Additions20Primary repair: TE
Portal Losses17Primary pressure: DL
Draft Loss0No NFL Draft departures recorded
Recruiting Reload#127Depth class
RBin 4 - Don Chaney Jr.3.60out 4 - Tyrell Reed Jr.3.49Even
current room: 203 lbs avg (2025 roster)
Sin 3 - Taijh Overton3.60out 2 - Kamrin Canterbury3.30Upgrade
DLin 0out 4 - Jerome Simmons3.60Starter Risk
current room: 286 lbs avg (2025 roster)
TEin 3 - Bryce Anderson3.60out 1 - Hunter Herring3.50Need Filled
current room: 240 lbs avg (2025 roster)
Complete TE2025 profileshows up in the passing game from any alignment
Junior-college recruit
EDGEin 2 - Le'Kell McGowan3.50out 2 - Kevontay Wells3.50Even
WRin 2 - Damarcco Blanton3.40out 2 - Jonathan Bibbs3.50Even
current room: 187 lbs avg (2025 roster)
Full roster (107 players)
Who's movedWho's transferring in and out, right now.

Transfer portal snapshot

+10.0 net portal points
(raw ledger: +15.3 — unweighted, no position adjustment)
DL
-11.5
starter risk
TE
+6.6
need filled
CB
+5.4
need filled
S
+4.9
QB
+3.6
low confidence
LB
-3.5
low confidence
OT
+3.5
low confidence
K
+3.0
low confidence
EDGE
+2.3
RB
+1.5
WR
-0.4
IOL
-0.1
Top commits

Top 3 commits

2026 class
★★★☆☆
Gavin Howard
WR · Lexington, MS
#1174 national
Profiles like a typical incoming wide receiver — 17 of his 25 closest recruiting profiles since 2018 shared the Possession Receiver archetype.~our read · projection from recruiting profile — no college snaps yet
★★★☆☆
Jeremyah Green
IOL · Quitman, AR
#2022 national
★★★☆☆
Marcellus Jackson
WR · Knoxville, TN
#129 national
Profiles like a typical incoming wide receiver — 16 of his 25 closest recruiting profiles since 2018 shared the Possession Receiver archetype.~our read · projection from recruiting profile — no college snaps yet
Where they're fromWhere this class actually comes from, on the map.

Recruiting Footprint · 2026

25
MS · 10TX · 5AL · 2IA · 2AR · 1FL · 1GA · 1KS · 1+2 more

MS leads the 2026 class with 10 commits. National footprint reaching 10 states.

Where they recruit · 2023-2026

99 signees across 17 states, 2023-2026. MS leads the pull.

MEVTNHWAIDMTNDMN1WIMINYMAORNVWYSDIA4ILINOHPA1NJCTCAUT1CONEMO1KYWVVA1MDDERIAZNMKS6AR2TN1NCSC1DCOK1LA6MS34AL15GA5AKHITX15FL4
Source CFB Zeitgeist · player_recruiting_profiles
Miles from homeHow far this roster travelled to get here.

Miles from home · 2026 roster

The median UL Monroe player grew up 288 miles from campus.

Half this roster came from closer than that; half came from farther.

57th-closest to home in FBS of 135 ranked →
Closest to homeFarthest from home
Middle 50%119–638 miquartile spread
Within 100 mi17%17 of 99 players
Farthest1,716 miNolan Wilson · Newhall, CA
Closest3 miLandon Graves · Monroe, LA

Straight-line distance from each player's listed hometown to Malone Stadium. Hometowns are placed at city-centroid precision, not street address — fine at this scale, but a player's true door-to-door number can differ by a few miles. 99 of 107 listed players have a geocoded hometown. Source: CFBD roster hometowns.

In-state shareHow much of this roster is home-grown.

Who owns LA · 2026 roster

17% of the UL Monroe roster grew up in LA.

18 of 104 players, drawn from 26 states in all. That is the 111th-highest in-state share of 135 ranked FBS programs.

Signing day undersells it: only 6% of the last 4 classes were from LA, but walk-ons and transfers pull the roster 11 points back toward home.

MS · 19LA · 18TX · 15AL · 10IA · 6FL · 5GA · 3PA · 3+18 more

Where the 2026 roster is from

104 players across 26 states. Biggest pull outside LA: MS (19).

MEVTNHWAIDMTNDMN1WI1MI1NYMA2ORNVWYSDIA6IL1IN1OH1PA3NJ2CTCA1UTCONEMO1KYWVVA3MDDERIAZ1NM2KS1AR1TN3NC1SC1DCOKLA18MS19AL10GA3AKHITX15FL5
Source CFB Zeitgeist · roster_entries (CFBD hometowns)
Every FBS roster ranked by in-state share →

Home state as listed on the CFBD roster. 3 listed players fall outside the 50 states and DC (international hometowns, or no state listed) and are excluded from the denominator. Source: CFBD roster hometowns.

Recruiting buzzWhat fans say about the incoming class right now.

Community pulse

No high-engagement r/cfb discussions tracked for this program in the last year.

How it turned outHow an old class actually turned out, years on.
Class Autopsy
The 2021 class: 0 drafted so far, 67% never transferred. D
See the class →
Fans vs. marketWhere fans and the betting market read this team differently.
Fan vs. market
99th
Fan percentile
(FBS mood rank)
4.5
Vegas O/U wins
(13th among FBS)
Fans 86pp more bullish than market implies
Win total consensus · 1 book
TakeawaysWhat this defense does once it gets the ball.
Takeaway conversion

Getting hands on the ball but not cashing in: 10% of disruptions converted, vs. the ~18% league rate.

1 interceptions of 10 disrupted passes (9 deflected, 1 intercepted), 2026 only.

PenaltiesWhether flags are costing this team games.
Penalty battle

Winning the penalty battle: 6 penalties committed vs. 16 drawn on opponents, a 85-yard edge.

60 penalty yards committed vs. 145 drawn on opponents, 2026 season total.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site