Mississippi State

2-0

SEC · Jeff Lebby, year 3 (9-18) · Davis Wade Stadium · 61,337 · 48,771 avg in 2026

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#98 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #35 (+9.4) · FPI #27
The marketSouth Carolina by 3.5at South Carolina · our model 17% Mississippi State · a number, not a pick

LastW 38–13 at Minnesota · Sat Sep 12 · Kamario Taylor 227 pass yds, 3 TD, 86 rush yds

Nextat South Carolina · Sat Sep 19 · 4:15 pm ET · Williams-Brice Stadium · South Carolina by 3.5 · series 7-10, last win 2016 · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

Key stats — 2026 — FBS rank
Points/game
50.0
Pts allowed/game
13.0
Total yards/gm#5 / 138 · 97th pct
620.5
Rush yards/gmT-#10 / 138 · 93rd pct
298.5
Pass yards/gm#24 / 138 · 83rd pct
322.0
Yards allowed/gm#46 / 138 · 67th pct
285.0
Rush yds allowed/gm#22 / 138 · 84th pct
75.5
SacksT-#60 / 138 · 50th pct
4
3rd-down conv#24 / 138 · 83rd pct
52.4%
All 70 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
1241620.5/gm8.44/play#5 / 138 · 97th pct#3 / 69 · 96th pct#1 / 16 · 97th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
570285.0/gm4.35/play#46 / 138 · 67th pct#38 / 69 · 46th pct#9 / 16 · 47th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush yards
Team
597298.5/gm4.06/playT-#10 / 138 · 93rd pctT-#6 / 69 · 91st pct#3 / 16 · 84th pct#12 / 13 · 15th pct
Opp
15175.5/gm1.15/play#22 / 138 · 84th pct#19 / 69 · 73rd pct#5 / 16 · 72nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush carries
Team
8341.5/gmT-#35 / 138 · 73rd pctT-#19 / 69 · 72nd pct#6 / 16 · 66th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
5527.5/gmT-#19 / 138 · 86th pctT-#14 / 69 · 80th pct#5 / 16 · 72nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush TDs
Team
63.0/gmT-#27 / 138 · 78th pctT-#19 / 69 · 71st pct#7 / 16 · 59th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 92nd pctT-#1 / 69 · 88th pctT-#1 / 16 · 84th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Net pass yards
Team
644322.0/gm4.38/play#24 / 138 · 83rd pct#14 / 69 · 80th pct#4 / 16 · 78th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
419209.5/gm3.20/play#72 / 138 · 48th pct#45 / 69 · 36th pct#11 / 16 · 34th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass attempts
Team
6432.0/gmT-#51 / 138 · 62nd pctT-#25 / 69 · 61st pct#6 / 16 · 66th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
7638.0/gmT-#117 / 138 · 15th pctT-#60 / 69 · 13th pct#14 / 16 · 16th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Completions
Team
4321.5/gmT-#53 / 138 · 62nd pctT-#30 / 69 · 57th pct#8 / 16 · 53rd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
4723.5/gmT-#119 / 138 · 14th pct#61 / 69 · 12th pct#14 / 16 · 16th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass TDs
Team
73.5/gmT-#11 / 138 · 91st pctT-#9 / 69 · 85th pctT-#2 / 16 · 88th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#13 / 138 · 80th pctT-#11 / 69 · 72nd pctT-#2 / 16 · 72nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Interceptions thrown
Team
00.0/gmT-#92 / 138 · 17th pctT-#42 / 69 · 20th pctT-#12 / 16 · 16th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 92nd pctT-#1 / 69 · 93rd pctT-#1 / 16 · 94th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Sacks (def)
Team
42.0/gmT-#60 / 138 · 50th pctT-#36 / 69 · 40th pctT-#11 / 16 · 25th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#9 / 138 · 86th pctT-#6 / 69 · 83rd pctT-#2 / 16 · 81st pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
Tackles for loss
Team
105.0/gmT-#79 / 138 · 38th pctT-#45 / 69 · 31st pct#15 / 16 · 9th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
73.5/gmT-#30 / 138 · 76th pctT-#18 / 69 · 70th pct#4 / 16 · 78th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
First downs
Team
6331.5/gm#5 / 138 · 97th pct#4 / 69 · 95th pct#2 / 16 · 91st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3216.0/gmT-#46 / 138 · 65th pctT-#35 / 69 · 48th pct#10 / 16 · 41st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down conv
Team
115.5/gmT-#63 / 138 · 52nd pctT-#37 / 69 · 44th pctT-#9 / 16 · 44th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
73.5/gmT-#29 / 138 · 76th pctT-#20 / 69 · 67th pct#8 / 16 · 53rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down att
Team
2110.5/gmT-#114 / 138 · 15th pctT-#57 / 69 · 15th pct#13 / 16 · 22nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
2914.5/gmT-#79 / 138 · 40th pctT-#41 / 69 · 39th pct#11 / 16 · 34th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down conv
Team
21.0/gmT-#51 / 138 · 51st pctT-#28 / 69 · 49th pctT-#10 / 16 · 31st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
42.0/gmT-#121 / 138 · 9th pctT-#63 / 69 · 7th pctT-#13 / 16 · 16th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down att
Team
21.0/gmT-#98 / 138 · 22nd pctT-#45 / 69 · 29th pctT-#11 / 16 · 25th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
63.0/gmT-#112 / 138 · 14th pctT-#59 / 69 · 10th pctT-#13 / 16 · 19th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Time of possession
Team
58:2829:14/gmT-#94 / 138 · 32nd pct#47 / 69 · 33rd pct#12 / 16 · 28th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
61:3230:46/gmT-#85 / 138 · 38th pct#47 / 69 · 33rd pct#12 / 16 · 28th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats — 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
+0.51 EPA/play1238 / 5667.9581
#21 FBS
10.47
#9 FBS
0196.37088.812.61.8
Running Backs
Player#GCarYdsAvgTDLongStuff%10+%
+0.40 EPA/play24227165
#48 FBS
6.12
#43 FBS
30
Receivers
Player#GRecYdsAvgTDLong
Deep Threat · +0.78 EPA/play3214239
#11 FBS
17.12
#24 FBS
39
+0.41 EPA/play7269816.32
#24 FBS
25
+0.51 EPA/play1328779.62
#24 FBS
30

2026 stat leaders · Mississippi State

through 2 games

Anthony Evans III leads Mississippi State with 239 receiving yards through 2 games.

1. Anthony Evans III WR 239 receiving yards
2. Kamario Taylor QB 581 passing yards
3. Jalen Smith LB 12 tackles
4. Fluff Bothwell RB 165 rushing yards
5. Tyler Lockhart LB 11 tackles
How They Play · 2025

Mississippi State fields a capable offense behind a porous defense.

Offense
53rd pct EPA/play
Defense
27th pct EPA allowed

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

The Savant Card · Mississippi State · 2025

Mississippi State reads strongest in explosive plays (top 38%) and rushing epa (top 43%); the crux lives in epa allowed, where Mississippi State sits at the 26th percentile.

offense · strengths lead

EPA / play +0.17
53rd
Success Rate +0.43
53rd
Explosive Plays +1.29
63rd
Rushing EPA +0.13
58th

defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA Allowed +0.19
27th
Success Rate Allowed +0.43
33rd
Explosive Plays Allowed +1.25
55th
Passing EPA Allowed +0.25
47th

hidden math · special situations

Passing EPA +0.23
42nd
Rushing EPA Allowed +0.12
34th
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 13 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 136 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · Mississippi State · 2018–present · FBS opponents

Mississippi State is worth +3.7 points more at home than on the road.

Middle of FBS, 40th percentile of 133 programs

51% at home, 33% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (25–24 home, 13–26 away). Interval ±4.3.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, Mississippi State has beaten the number by +1.0 more at home than away over 72 games — inside the ±6.7 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

Davis Wade Stadium seats 61,337 and has averaged 86% full (52,457, 29 games reported). Visitors cover a median 355 miles to get here since 2018 — 54th-shortest of 135 FBS venues, inside the ordinary range. 14% of the 2026 roster (15 of 106 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 56 home games since 2018.

Home25–24Away13–26Edge+3.7 ±4.3Visitor trip355 mi

More in this tab

Pass defense by zoneThe part of the field opponents keep attacking.

Pass-depth identity

What this team throws, and gives up, by depth.

On short throws (≤19 air yards), Mississippi State’s defense allows a completion rate below the FBS mean (65.1% vs 65.2% league-wide, shrunk toward the mean for its 71-play sample) — mid-pack, 8 of 18 qualifying defenses.

We won’t show a deep-ball (20+ air yards) leaderboard here, on either side of the ball: even a full season of charted plays gives most teams well under 30 deep attempts — too thin to tell a real tendency from noise, so we won’t guess. Same refusal for yards-after-catch allowed and where a team’s attempts land by zone: both measured and both came back statistically indistinguishable from season-to-season noise.

Screened 59 claims, 59 survived · 2025+ only, charted plays (parse_status='complete'); n=71 short-zone plays, raw rate 64.8%
RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Model Consensus

Where the Models Rank Mississippi State

CFB Zeitgeist

#98

-2.7

SP+

#35

+9.4

FPI

#27

+12.2

Elo

#37

1642

The national models put Mississippi State between 27th and 37th nationally — CFB Zeitgeist is more skeptical, at 98th.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · Mississippi State

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

Historical echoPrograms whose arc bent the same way -- then what happened.

Historical echo

Mississippi State’s slide has precedent — and 1 of the 4 closest kept falling.

Programs whose stature fell in the same shape. The grey line is their decline; the color is what came next for them.

Georgia Tech 1965–1970
stayed down
Colorado 2009–2014
stayed down
BYU 2000–2005
clawed back
Utah 1964–1969
kept sliding

An analogy on the shape of a program’s Zeitgeist stature arc — not a prediction. Interim calibration, medium confidence; matched among current FBS programs at a comparable level.

ConditionsThe weather and altitude visitors have to deal with.
Venue texture

71°F average kickoff temp; 5% of games had measurable precipitation; 5 mph average wind.

Based on 83 home games with weather data.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site